“Coats! Comey! Sessions! They are all against me!” Donald screamed in the Oval Office.
He picked up a bust of Eisenhower and threw it at one of the windows. It bounced off the tough glass and fell to the floor impotently, like a hollow metaphor.
herp
“All against me,” he yelled at the Presidential pillow humping couch. Jr. and Eric huddled together on it, clawing at each other in panic.
“Bright lights!” Jr. yelped.
“Loud noises!” Eric agreed.
Donald snatched the hair from his head and wrung it in his hands with anxiety.
“What are we going to do?” he asked his idiot sons, “I can’t trust anyone. They all turn on me in the end, they all betray me.”
“Ivanka,” Eric whispered. He had wet her bed until he was 15.
“Jared,” Jr. whispered, afraid that the fearsome bust of Dime Man would be thrown at him.
“They are already doing what they can,” Donald replied. He had twisted the hair into a rope and was slapping against his leg as he stalked back and forth.
“You two are just going to have to step up,” Donald said.
He tossed the mess of hair onto his desk and picked up his beloved MAGA hat. He crossed to the couch and jammed it down on Jr.’s head roughly.
“You are going to be Attorney General after I get rid of Jeffy,” Donald said.
“I don’t wanna, Papa,” he said miserably. He thought about getting a blowjob on a speedboat and began to cry.
durr
Donald pointed at Eric. “And you will be Director of National Intelligence,” he said. “You’re smart, right? Like, national intelligence smart at least.”
Eric nodded dumbly. He thought about calling Ivanka, but Papa got mad when he talked on his phone. He would tell her later. She would be proud of him, he thought. She might even leave Jared before Eric had to try and have him killed again.
“Where’d he go?” Donald asked Jr., pointing at a staring Eric, but Jr. only shook his head.
“I should have put you both in a sack when you were little and thrown you in the river,” Donald muttered.
“Yes, Papa,” they both said in nauseating harmony.
The hat fell off Jr.’s carefully shellacked dome of hair and landed on the couch, upside-down like a helpless turtle.
He thought about getting a blowjob on a speedboat and began to cry.
Beautiful…I would cry too.
Is the boat anchored or speeding through choppy waters?
It’s like poetry
Poignant, even.
Oh, and the poor Hair…like he hasn’t had enough going on already. And the Hat…jammed on yet another ‘tard head.
I guess i dont see why comey testifyig will destroy trump.
“I hope you will see to let this go” is not the same as shutting it down. Calling that obstruction is weak at best even if true. As mccabe has testified repeatedly it has been unimpeded.
Thos anonymous sources last week were hoping trump would call their bluff by saying comey is going to testify obstruction. They were hoping he would call executive privelege to make him look guilty..trump didnt bite and now narrative has changed
Literally.
Hitler.
Comey also testified on may 3 saying shutting down for political reasons hasn’t happened in his experience. Now he could weasal and say that just applied to question that mentioned doj …but that doesnt hold water as potus would be even more. Also calls into question when he decided if it was obstruction or not…and did he tell anyone. If he was just saving it for later, that makes his claim fall
If Comey says that Trump was obstructing justice and he remained silent all of this time, he would also find himself indicted. I don’t think Comey is that guy. Comey is the guy who’s looking to get out of this and loooking for his next big paycheck in the private sector. If there’s been any real obstruction of justice in the last few years, it’s overwhelmingly likely that it involved Bill Clinton and one ex AG on a plane.
Or smashing phones with hammers
Bleachbit servers
Wiping servers with a towel?
They’ve already given up on that. Now the big prize is that Comey will say he never told Trump he wasn’t under investigation. Somehow, that’s impeachment stuff right there because Trump tweeted something. These people are in such deep denial of reality that I can’t even…
Everyone who thought that Chocolate Jesus was the best president this country has ever had thought they were going to get part two with Clinton. Instead, they got a rich old white man with a reputation for being a sexist asshole with absolutely no shame whatsoever. It’s not even like you reach for a soda expecting a Coke and it’s a Pepsi. It’s like they reached for a Coke and it was a grilled cheese sandwich. Clinton was supposed to be elected in a blowout and continue the expansion of progressive bureaucracy. Instead, and despite the predictions of almost the entire MSM, Trump wins the electoral and loses the popular, which to their minds means he stole the election. That the government they worship actually allowed this to happen by design is an added twist of horrific irony. And within days of taking office, he enacts an immigration ban (not really, but that’s what they see), appoints cabinet members who are diametrically opposed to the progressive ideals of their departments, and basically continues to put his feet all over the nice couch of government.
As far as they’re concerned, none of this makes any sense. So, if Trump can just magically become president for no reason, why can’t he magically be removed and replaced with Hillary? That makes total sense to these people. For them, this is basically one long fever dream. Sense and predictability got left behind with the election. For them, they’re now in a bizarro world where chaos in the only thing they can rely on.
They want their tantrum throwing to work like it did with their spineless parents…
I liked grilled cheese sandwiches.
Reuben sandwiches or GTFO
“Can’t we all get along?”
It’s weird to me that people laughed at Rodney King when he asked that. I thought it was a good question.
They laughed because it’s a pipe dream. People can’t get along, they don’t want to get along. Most people can’t even leave each other alone, never mind “get along”. Being disagreeable toward your fellow man is a fundamental characteristic of humanity.
Cubano.
*strikes classical boxing pose*
French (freedom) dip!
*readies for fisticuffs*
I haven’t seen this level of insanity in my life. They are completely delusional.
Hey pinkos. Listen carefully. Hillary is not going to be president. Not now, not ever.
Trump is president of the united states. He is doing a pretty good job so far. He is going to be re-elected. Every day I see more people being won over to him.
My daughter says, “Yes, Papa.” Damn.
*looks askance at straffinrun*
Not like that, Perv. Asian filial piety is alien to you weirdos.
Like abandoning Granny on a mountain once she gets to be too much of a pain in the ass?
No kidding.
Asian filial piety is alien to you weirdos.
Rule 34?
“Asian filial piety is alien to you weirdos.”
Hey, some of us have seen Ozu movies, ストレイピングラン
So were the hat and hair screaming in pain the whole time or do they have to pretend they’re inanimate when other people are around like toy story?
Damn that’s a good question. Plot hole?
Been answered – look how the Hat stayed stoic and silent during his kidnapping ordeal, while the Hair screamed threats at the kidnapper.
This is a hard plot to follow
Not at all – it is just like the classic serials that ran in magazines for decades!
Similar situation
I think I can see where this is going:
Eric and Ivanka finally consummate their hidden incestuous desires and begat the Antichrist. Revelations happens. The Earth is destroyed. Thus proving once and for all Trump is literally worse than Hitler.
I, for one, look forward to SF’s lurid description of when Eric and Ivanka yield to their raging concupiscence.
So the Trumps are the modern day Borgias now?
I think it may be a reference to the Clodii, considering Trump is basically modern day Clodius Pulcher and there was always rumours floating around about incestuous relationships in the family.
Paul McCartney is the Antichrist, everyone knows this. It’s just not time for his reign of terror yet, there’e still rumors about a Beatles reunion.
So long as zombie John Lenin doesn’t play Imagine, that’s fine
That’s going to be McCartney’s theme song for world domination.
Better than Silly Love Songs.
So’s bamboo skewers in your ear-holes.
Compromise should be “Band on the Run” by Wings
Ringo will defeat him yet.
*makes sign of crossed drumsticks*
The trump progeny really do look like genetically-damaged trailer trash given a high-end makeover; albeit one by someone with a dated, nuveau-riche aesthetic.
e.g. the penchant for italian pinstripes and slicked-back hair. Its like they never realized that no one else in the money-business has dressed like that since the early 1990s. there have been like 4 or 5 generations of ‘wall st’-guy-fashion since then. They look far more like a parody than the real mcCoy. Like they’re going to a Wall Steet-Themed Frat Party.
The apples don’t fall far from the tree.
I liked whoever said Eric and Jr. looked like they were always attending an American Psycho cosplay con.
Fuck. I will never be able to unsee that.
So which one is Luis Carruthers and which one is Paul Allen?
Hey, I resemble that remark – at least the hair slick part. It’s the only way I know of keeping this mop under control, beyond buzzing it all.
This is why I started buzzing my hair a few years ago. So much easier to deal with.
Easiest way to control your hair: male pattern baldness. It’s God’s way of saying ‘it’s over, buddy’.
I used to buzz my hair, but during the winters my head would get cold. Anyways I like to make the bald men of America angry with my zero male pattern baldness. Or maybe I looked too much like a skinhead.
I wasn’t suggesting any particular hairstyle was démodé
i was just saying that the entire family seems to have cribbed their look from a outdated Wall St stereotype. its just weird. you’d think the younger ones would be trying to be hip to their own peer group. instead, even bannon – the fucking kiddy – looks like he just got done snorting coke in the bathroom of the Rainbow Room circa 1988
*barron. i confused with the Secret Nazi Advisor
That look actually kind of works for the Trumps IMO – their whole image is conveying what poor, working class folk think billionaires should look like.
Yeah, same here. I have poker straight and baby fine hair. I’d look silly (either a the Professor from the Blinded me With Science video or Cousin it from the Addams Family) if I didn’t use something. The funny thing is that I went from using the same stuff my Dad used (Groom-n-Clean) to the same stuff my Grandfather used (Vitalis) as I got older.
I’m a Brylcreem man. Groom-n-Clean was way to oily.
The only way is a good water-based pomade.
Barbarians.
“I’m a Dapper Dan man, dammit!”
Actually, no. It’s good, but this stuff is better, if you can find it
Yeah, Groom-n-Clean really was greasy kids stuff. I can’t say I’ve ever tried Brylcreem. I’d always assumed it was similar.
I’ve noticed between the Vitalis and my aftershave (Pinaud Clubman – $9/bottle), I get a lot of compliments from women about smelling nice.
I think I’m probably tapping into subconscious tender feelings they have for their grandfathers.
I actually met that Prof a number of times. A very friendly guy, a nutritionist, Dr. Magnus Pike.
That’s the guy.
Let’s just say that he was a cut above Bill Nye when it came to popularizing science.
I had a boss who preferred the Gordon Gecko look. He was a grade A asshole.
Everything about the Trumps is caricature. Look at the way he decorated his Trump Tower penthouse apartment – even Louis XIV would roll his eyes at that. His style in everything is a garish stereotype of what he thinks real wealth is supposed to look like – the Gordon Gekko look, gold-plating everything, the neoclassical artwork, etc.
Why aren’t the hat snd the hair animated snd talking outrageous bullshit? I must’ve missed an installment or three?
Would you talk to Herp and Durr? They will probably give Donny Two Scoops a talkin’ to when they get him alone.
the fearsome bust of Dime Man
Ooh, does it have a cigarette holder…at a jaunty angle? That could be an impalin’!
Nice alt-text, SF.
What I want to know: when are we going to see a Secret Nazi President/Hat and Hair franchise crossover? Or is that all part of the plan?
ANIMATED HAT & HAIR ADVENTURES FOR PRESIDENT!!!
The Nipponese are way ahead of you.
Nice Hillary witch character.
NEEDS MOAR TENTACLEZ.
In the first episode, the hair and hat get in a fight and the hair accidentally slaps the hat on the head of random drunken asshole and then he suddenly develops Secret Nazi powers. Like that movie The Mask. All the power is really in the hat. That’s how Trump became Secret Nazi President.
I keep having to remind myself that the mocking ‘secret nazi’ thing is something that people were and probably still are seriously asserting. It beyond parody. I cant remember which writer over at TSTSNBN said it but that was the first time I saw it. I thought they were joking. I think ENB was the one who told me you could find secret nazis by their secret nazi haircuts.
Reason had that particularly smug article about how they were superior to other outlets because they hadn’t called Trump a fascist ‘yet’.
Cue every third article where writers called him an authoritarian or inferred that he has ‘authoritarian tendencies’.
Suderman seriously claimed that Trump was going to have vigilante gangs murdering people in the streets.
The thing that’s funny is that Trump *is* a fascist – but one on the continuum between Berlusconi and Mussolini. And since he doesn’t really have a mass movement supporting him, his fascist impulses are checked by the system of checks – dysfunctional though they may be in this age of the unitary executive – built into the federal government.
Trump is far less dangerous than FDR and Wilson. Hell, he’s less dangerous than Teddy Roosevelt. And calm, reasoned arguments against his bad ideas would go much farther than engaging pantshitting mode with the volume dial turned to 11.
The brown pants are in control of the media.
He is far less dangerous than Hillary Clinton and Obama wasn’t anything to sneeze at. When I round up all of the awful things she said and look at them all together that is one scary bitch.
It’s not just her ideas that make Hillary dangerous; it’s that she has the entire political establishment, mainstream media, big business, and the pundit class supporting her and defending her. Trump, on the other hand, has both his good and bad policy ideas cornered and hamstring by those same sects of elites.
I agree 100%. Look at what Obama did. First, Obama was a fascist as well (remember that fascism really has no political theory, so much as abeing reactionary, lawless and disrespecting of any limitation on state power – it can be right wing or left wing and is often both). Worse, he set up a private political mass movement called Organizing for America, and engaged in both state and private repression of his enemies.
Fortunately, Obama was fundamentally a coward. When he faced overt opposition that required him to take a risky stand, he buckled like a belt. Otherwise, we might have seen our first American dictator since FDR.
Hillary, on the other hand, was not a coward. She was reckless, ruthless and willing to take big risks to get even small rewards. With the state security apparatus at her command, she would have been Stalin to Obama’s Lenin act.
I wouldn’t really call Trump a fascist: he doesn’t really have much of a mindset or strategy in regards to governance to attribute him to any particular philosophy. What he is, however, is an opportunist: he accurately pinpointed and marketed towards the anger and anti-establishment sentiment of 2016 when others didn’t, and IMO sort of winged it after he got the nomination.
I think the conflation between populism and fascism is unproductive and really only serves to normalize and legitimize fascism. Fascism is a coherent ideology, and Trump fundamentally lacks that. Half of his campaign was him throwing stuff out and seeing what stuck to the wall.
My point, exactly. Trump is an opportunist and a populist. His campaign, from what I could tell, consisted of listening to what the crowd wanted and crafting improvised, on-the-fly sales pitches to quench their thirst.
True fascists, like Hitler or Mussolini, were both reactionaries, of course, but they were also painstakingly organized and had an entire bureaucracy and military to support, promote, and execute their statist philosophies and ideas.
God damn it! My beautifulr reply was lost when my fucking login timed out!
And now I lack the time to retype it!
Very briefly, then!
If you look at how Mussolini and Hitler ruled in the run up to World War II, you will see that they – on most issues – switched sides and supported contradictory positions. And that’s because it was necessary to prevent a powerful opposition from forming.
True, Trump isn’t a genuine fascist; he doesn’t’ want to centralize control in the state. He is, however, a soft fascist, in that he conflates the state with society, and has a corporatist view of how the state ought to operate.
Fucking squirrels!
He is, however, a soft fascist, in that he conflates the state with society, and has a corporatist view of how the state ought to operate.
Again though, this is the overwhelming majority viewpoint on the nature of the state and economy in Western, and certainly non-Western polities (unless you read your Hegel but fuck Hegel). Is everyone a soft fascist? If yes, then isn’t it just normalizing fascism to broadly declare that? By this definition everyone on the political spectrum from Trump to the nation of Sweden is technically a fascist. Why’s it even remotely productive to point out that Trump is a ‘soft fascist’ if nearly everyone is one?
Fascism being remembered as this is a hell of a lot more productive that just broadly declaring that 80%+ of the population is really fascist.
I took a look at what Mussolini defined as fascism, and it doesn’t really match up very well to what Trump represents IMO. Trump has never, from my knowledge, promoted expansionism or fought against the democratic-republic system of government. The only things that I see similarities is the idea that the State is the embodiment of the nation and its people and the corporatist worldview. Other non-fascist nationalist movements have also subscribed to the latter ideas, as well.
The thing that’s funny is that Trump *is* a fascist
Perhaps. But, by what standard? I’d make the suggestion that, if you go by the “leave me alone and don’t take my stuff” standard, Trump is probably in the top 25-30% in D.C.
If that’s the case (and I’m open to being convinced it’s not), then what does that make the other 70%?
We have to get the episode numbers to coincide first.
Episode #69? #666? #1488? Help us out here.
Correct numbering….That would make it “Just a Hat, not a Sermon”?
Forget about episode numbers and just go straight to star dates.
I almost spit out my applesauce. (NOT a euphemism)
Maybe I’m the only one who imagines things like this. But anyway, in the Democrat’s fever dreams of this Comey guy, here’s a guy who took down the rightfully would have been President of the United States and then shortly after re-appears and takes down the sitting President of the United States. To me, that almost sounds like a one guy coup and takeover of the USA. If you really think about it, that is some fucked up shit. I can actually see why the left are so obsessed with this guy. Comey with the help of the ‘Deep State’ takes down both presidential candidates and then after the coup, Barack Obama is ushered in and made Supreme leader forever, just as it should be.
Trump violates First Amendment rights by failing to give soapbox to crazy leftists.
Milo unavailable for comment (because they banned him on Twitter).
Apparently harassment of wrongthink is now first amendment territory, and twitter is now the fourth branch of government.
Still better than the Fourth Estate
2 questions.
1. Is Twitter a privately owned and operated company?
2. Is it, or is it not, Twitter policy to allow it’s users to block other users?
No further questions.
It isnt even that. He isnt preventing them from tweeting or punishing them in a legal manner. He is choosing not to listen which is his right
my favorite part of that story are the replies of all the Democrat politicians who have blocked them. Once again, morons have no sense of consequence.
Steve Shives hardest hit.
It’d make him the Literally Hitler of Twitter.
Literally Twittler?
Damn, you’re really making me want to fire up Photoshop…
If any mods are around, and you can put that pic up, I’d appreciate it.
You are welcome…*Good Edit Fairy*
The Steve Shives “feminazi” pic, that is.
Thx…
Did you order your “The Great Meme War” Tee from Sargon yet?
No. Poverty sucks.
Is Shives even still a thing?
I thought Bearing had harassed him off the ‘net.
That would actually be a sad thing. Shives is fucking comedic gold for Bearing and Sargon.
The “chicks with dicks” troll was hilarious. A bit of a dick move on Bearing’s part, but I’ll let it go because I laughed so much.
If Bearing didn’t do stuff like that (and some of those animations of the Shives family ‘dynamic’) , what would we do for lolz?
I agree. I’ll cut Bearing a lot of slack because he’s funny as hell.
This is beginning to get a bit too SugarFreeish for me.
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/os-jcomey-060817.pdf
Seems like progs are in for a let down
They always are. And it’s always self inflicted.
“President then returned to the topic of Mike Flynn, saying, “He is a good guy and has been through a lot.” He repeated that Flynn hadn’t done anything wrong on his calls with the Russians, but had misled the Vice President. He then said, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” I replied only that “he is a good guy.” (In fact, I had a positive experience dealing with Mike Flynn when he was a colleague as Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency at the beginning of my term at FBI.) I did not say I would “let this go.”
The President returned briefly to the problem of leaks. I then got up and left out the door by the grandfather clock, making my way through the large group of people waiting there, including Mr. Priebus and the Vice President.
I immediately prepared an unclassified memo of the conversation about Flynn and discussed the matter with FBI senior leadership. I had understood the President to be requesting that we drop any investigation of Flynn in connection with false statements about his conversations with the Russian ambassador in December. I did not understand the President to be talking about the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign. I could be wrong, but I took him to be focusing on what had just happened with Flynn’s departure and the controversy around his account of his phone calls. Regardless, it was very concerning, given the FBI’s role as an independent investigative agency.”
independent investigative agency
Except when Obama and Co. says jump!
OT: Iranian parliament under siege earlier today.
Interesting times, indeed.
What, they aren’t Islaming hard enough? Maybe they need to step up the stonings or something.
What do we want?
Beheadings!
When do we want them?
NOW!
Don’t you people work? And somebody mentioned grilled cheese sandwiches? Is that where all the Libertarian women are, making the sandwiches?
I want a libertarian women sandwich!
Sorry sir, we’re fresh out of libertarian women.. how about a marxist burger? You’ll have to share it with everyone else, though.
And we’re all out of meat. And bread. Comrade Styenko has a few mustard packets, though.
I’ll just stick with my anarchy burger then. Hold the government, please.
I can imagine an anarchy burger as a piece of undercooked liver with weed and lsd and two rubber sandals as buns.
We can provide you with women; it just depends on how comfortable you are pretending to be an SJW to get some fuzz.
I have no shame for the poontang.
It’s not possible to be out of something that never existed.
You mentioned grilled cheese sandwiches?
Well, if they’re good libertarian wiminz, of course they’re making us a nice sammich right now. What, we’re supposed to pull our orphans from the mines to make sammiches? Ridiculous!
May 22, WaPo writes story alleging Intel Chiefs claimed that trump had made inappropriate demands of them =
Trump asked intelligence chiefs to push back against FBI collusion probe after Comey revealed its existence
Today, Intel Chiefs testify to congress, and WaPo reports =
Does the new, post testimony report suggest anything was incorrect in earlier reporting?
Does earlier reporting feature any caveats or updates? LOL silly rabbit. That’s not how Journalism works.
The WP has become a complete and total rag. Bezos should be ashamed.
Why should he? I am 100% sure this is going exactly as intended. He wanted a leftist propaganda mill and he is fucking getting his moneys worth.
Is it?
I haven’t seen any interviews with the man to know, but he’s never struck me as the kind of raving idiot that would prefer that.
Jeff Bezos says Donald Trump ‘erodes democracy’
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/20/jeff-bezos-donald-trump-criticism-amazon-blue-origin
The thing is you are missing the story from last night which changed the may 22 story from pushing back on russia bs to wanting to interfere with comey
The dni spokesman also put out a statement for coats can be seen at circa.com saying he was never pressured to interfere
http://circa.com/politics/a-dni-spokesperson-said-that-director-coats-never-felt-pressured-by-the-president
please clarify what you’re saying with quotes and links
My point is very simple and isn’t missing anything AFAIK. Congressional testimony just directly contradicted WaPo’s “bombshell” claims from only 2 weeks ago. Yet they’re completely ignoring it and pretending that the ‘scandal’ is their refusal to provide more detail other than these denials.
Last night they changed that may story you talked about into a bigger bombshell
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html
Only to get contradicted on the record by dni spokesperson for coates that night and today
If all this shit is unclear, its mostly because WaPo itself is all over the freaking map. They literally have multiple stories on exactly the same subject saying different things.
this same thing happened when they ran that bullshit story about Russians hacking the ‘energy grid’. The bogus story actually remained up and unchanged even as they were publishing a ‘debunking’/clarification on a different part of their website.
Link to newest story, which emphasizes that the Intel chiefs instead refused (suspiciously!) to talk about further details.
The direct contradiction of their earlier reporting is dropped in the middle of the piece , and skipped past it like it has no bearing on the larger point
So now WaPo are making up stuff about made up stuff? Ok.
Both rogers and coats statements on the record is clear cut trump didnt do what wapo said. They just wont discuss what the private convo was about
And why won’t they discuss that conversation? That is the strange part.
Hot Air has a good article wondering about that
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/06/07/im-not-sure-legal-basis-intel-chiefs-refuse-answer-asked-influence-investigation/
They gave a statement on it being influenced. They said no.
Why would they then reveal what their private convo was?
That’s a fair point. Allahpundit seems to think that they denied that anyone ‘pressured’ them, but refused to answer whether or not the president asked them to end the investigation. Trying to parse out the difference between the two questions.
I think the contradiction that cuts to the heart of the matter is that WaPo claimed both men felt something inappropriate had occurred.
Both men then said explicitly that nothing inappropriate had occurred.
Whether or not there were conversations about any particular issue is irrelevant if they are insisting that whatever was discussed was de-facto ‘appropriate’; in effect, the people suggesting that they’re hiding something untoward by not discussing details are ignoring their qualification of the conversations.
Allahpundit can be an entertaining writer at times, but he’s pretty clearly been going the clickbait route with Trump for quite a while now.
Because the President and his advisers need to have one on one conversations that don’t end up in the newspapers every time some aide who had to wait outside fabricates what is discussed?
True, which means that the administration should have claimed executive privilege with regards to these conversations. It doesn’t appear that the Trump Justice Department briefed the two on what they would declare as privileged conversations
It isnt strange. What the man said was that he would not discuss confidential conversations he had with the President and he shouldn’t. It is what i would have said.
Gilmore what i meant to say and sorry is wapo looks even worse because your first post didnt even mention their 6/6 story where they essentially changed the may 22 story
That is now contradicted
“Trump to Comey: ‘I expect loyalty,’ according to former FBI chief’s prepared testimony In written remarks submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee ahead of his Thursday hearing, James Comey recalled nine separate private conversations with President Trump, one of which he detailed the president asking him to drop any investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn. By Devlin Barrett 16 minutes ago The Fix: Comey’s prepared remarks, annotated”
Wapo lies again…see above for actual comey statement
Wapo neglects to mention the 3 times not under investigation
Dude- it’s the Washington Post. Does anyone take them seriously anymore? They’re a propaganda outlet
You know who else expected loyalty…..
Theory – while the hair is The Hair, the hat is just a hat. MAGA Prime has absconded off to Canada, to be the third part of Obama-Zoolander devil’s threesome.
The 6669?
My reaction whenever I see those two together.
Devil’s Threesome?
I guess Zoolander is the girl, since he’s the pretty one?