Victorians on the Internet

by | Apr 8, 2023 | Beer, Food & Drink, Gender, Media | 150 comments

Finally!  My self-imposed beer embargo is over.  Finally, I can evaluate the stupid things everyone around me wants to talk about with the mindset befitting of the situation.

This is my review of The Bruery Partridge in a Pear Tree Quadruppel Ale:

If you’re one of the six people following the Women’s NCAA Tournament this will be old news, so go ahead and skip below.

For everyone else, the story goes like this:  the white girl made a gesture.  The black girl on the other team made the same gesture, since she happened to be on the team that won, she did the gesture again as well as a few others determined to be “classless” by internet Victorians.  What was the gesture?

Naturally, internet Victorians are racist.  This is the least interesting part, of a fairly uninteresting string of events.

Prior to the game, Dr. First Lady apparently went to visit the LSU locker room prior to the game.  LSU declined, in part because the president picked them to lose early on his bracket.  Later when LSU won and John Cena hand gestures were exchanged between competitors of various races, colors, and creeds, Dr. First Lady had an unusual offer:  why can’t both teams visit the White House?

Without getting into the absurd notion of celebrating losers, the Iowa girl thankfully declined:

“I think LSU should enjoy that moment for them, and congratulations obviously. They deserve to go there. Maybe I could go to the White House on different terms. That’s for LSU. That’s a pretty cool moment and they should enjoy every second of being a champion,”

Trouble is, the LSU girl also declined:

LSU’s Angel Reese, who was named the tournament’s Most Outstanding Player, tweeted that Biden’s comments were “a joke” as it’s not customary for a losing team to receive such an invitation.[…]

“If we were to lose, we would not be getting invited to the White House,” Reese said. This was another example of the double standard that Reese faced during her tournament run.

I just find it humorous for whatever reason, nobody else wants to point out neither team wants to visit the White House.

 

A Christmas beer on Easter?  Deal with it.  This was inspired by a dessert known as Poire à la Beaujolaise.  This is densely packed Belgian style quad that is heavily spiced like one might expect a Christmas Ale to be.  Not as carbonated as expected, maybe a bit fruity, but it packs quite a punch. Pair it with holiday faire and/or the drudgery of the day. The Bruery Partridge in a Pear Tree Quadruppel Ale: 3.9/5

About The Author

mexican sharpshooter

mexican sharpshooter

WARNING: Glibertarians.com contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. https://youtu.be/qiAyX9q4GIQ?t=2m22s

150 Comments

  1. Count Potato

    It’s Easter, not Christmas, though.

    • Count Potato

      “Deal with it. ”

      OK?

      • Chafed

        That’s the sort of self-awareness that keeps bringing me back.

      • mexican sharpshooter

        I said deal with it,

    • PieInTheSky

      Just to be perfectly clear, Easter is in 8 days from now,

      • R C Dean

        I can see why creatures of the night would celebrate the undead savior.

  2. Count Potato

    “I just find it humorous for whatever reason, nobody else wants to point out neither team wants to visit the White House.”

    To be fair, many of them are too tall for Joe to sniff their hair.

    • Fourscore

      “I just find it humorous for whatever reason, nobody else wants to point out neither team wants to visit the White House.”

      Nor do most of the other 330M of Americans, not to visit and certainly not to live there.

      It takes a “Special Person” to be that motivated.

      • creech

        Even Brandon gets out of WH for the weekend. I guess it is no longer the most prestigious address in the world.

    • mexican sharpshooter

      They’re also too old.

      • DEG

        I guess I should have read the comments before commenting.

      • The Other Kevin

        Congrats Animal! With all these published authors here we’re turning into the next Algonquin Round Table.

    • R C Dean

      Yup. With a Dem governor, SecState, and AG, Arizona is fortified. Confident prediction: a Repub won’t win a statewide race until something very drastic indeed happens.

  3. CPRM

    You mean whatever that hand thing is it isn’t a secret racist nazi dog whistle like the OK sign?

    • Chafed

      That’s what I expected the surprise ending to be.

    • R C Dean

      What is that hand signal supposed to mean, anyway?

      • mexican sharpshooter

        “You can’t see me.”

      • R C Dean

        Oookay. If that’s supposed to be an insult or dominance move, I’m not getting it.

        *moves on*

  4. The Late P Brooks

    I don’t get it. Needs more labels.

  5. Animal

    Well. I’ve been published at RedState.

    • Raven Nation

      Kudos

    • PieInTheSky

      sounds extremist.

      • Animal

        Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.

      • PieInTheSky

        liberty is a dogwhistle

    • Fourscore

      Good show, Animal. Another history lesson for us enthusiasts.

    • Tundra

      Nice!

      That article seems familiar somehow. Also, you refer to Mrs. Animal a couple times – that should generate some comments!

      • Animal

        Yeah, they didn’t give me a chance to correct that.

    • R.J.

      Fantastic!

    • CPRM

      Heh, you refer to yourself and the wife as Mr and Mrs Animal. That might confuse the normies.

      • Spudalicious

        “So, you’re furries?”

        “No.”

        “But…”

    • CPRM

      This oldie might get thrown into one of my photoshop articles soon.

    • Mojeaux

      That is FANTASTIC!

    • Sean

      😃👍

    • Chafed

      Congratulations and great work Animal.

    • Tonio

      W00t! Local boy makes good.

    • mexican sharpshooter

      Nice.

    • R C Dean

      Very nice. I caught the shout out to your nom du blog also.

    • cavalier973

      The police said they found a Mauser. A MAUSER! Not a Mannlicher!

    • DEG

      Go to a gun show, like the big thousand-table Oaks, PA gun show that Mrs. Animal and I attended a few years back, and you’ll see ninety percent of the tables displaying AR-15s and other Tacticool weaponry.

      I was there last weekend. They had three halls open. I think it was a little less than 90% of tables with AR stuff this time. I didn’t buy any guns but I did score some hard-to-find ammunition.

      Now, one could argue that the semi-auto action gives them an advantage in these situations. I think that’s a canard. One can, with a minimum of practice, handle a lever gun or a pump gun with as much speed as a semi-auto.

      Bloke on the Range tried this out with Lindybeige. Lindybeige showed a much bigger improvement in his shooting speed with the Garand than Bloke. I’m watching the video again, and I think Lindybeige with the Garand beat out Bloke with the No. 4.

      Focusing on the tool in this debate is exactly the wrong thing to do.

      Yes.

      I like the article.

      • R C Dean

        I was very impressed with the speed and capability of some of the oldsters at one of my shotgun classes who were running pumps. But they had literally thousands of shells and who knows how many hours to get to that level. The point of most developments in firearms technology is to make it easier to be good, including semi-autos, red dot optics, who knows what else.

        All that said, yes, I would rather face a tacticool tranny with an AR and couple hours range time than some old coot with a bolt-action with a thousand rounds of experience under his belt. Where you want to be when SHTF, is with a thousand rounds of experience (minimum) running your semi-auto.

      • DEG

        All that said, yes, I would rather face a tacticool tranny with an AR and couple hours range time than some old coot with a bolt-action with a thousand rounds of experience under his belt. Where you want to be when SHTF, is with a thousand rounds of experience (minimum) running your semi-auto.

        Agreed.

      • DEG

        My mistake. Bloke with the No. 4 beat Lindy with the Garand. 27 v. 24.

    • Gadfly

      Congrats!

    • Chafed

      Been there.

    • Scruffyy Nerfherder

      *memories of a holiday trip to the ER to find out if the toddler swallowed the decorative glass out of the fireplace*

    • Tundra

      Scary. Why on earth wouldn’t the governor intervene?

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        He needs to pardon him, no doubt…but what’shisface is a squish/wuss.

      • Tonio

        It would look better if the conviction were overturned on appeal. Executive clemency is a last resort. And that sucks because punishment is process.

        And even if the conviction is overturned, or he’s pardoned, the Biden DOJ could swoop in with civil rights charges.

      • R C Dean

        There’s almost no chance it gets overturned on appeal, absent some procedural screwup by the judge. The jury’s fundamental finding, that self-defense was not justified, is basically immune from appeal.

      • DEG

        I think in Texas the governor’s pardon power is limited. I think the state Parole board has to approve it?

    • Gustave Lytton

      Typical bullshit. BLM and antifa are supported by the establishment.

    • DrOtto

      Austin ain’t Texas.

  6. The Late P Brooks

    Peak oil

    Tesla’s report is not the only one warning about the cost of committing to fossil fuels long-term. An Oxford University study last year found that switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy by 2050 could save the global economy around $12 trillion, while warning that the narrative of the energy transition being too expensive to pursue was misleading.

    “There is a pervasive misconception that switching to clean, green energy will be painful, costly and mean sacrifices for us all—but that’s just wrong,” Doyne Farmer, an economist and lead author on the Oxford study, said in a statement. “Completely replacing fossil fuels with clean energy by 2050 will save us trillions.”

    We just reach into the magic hat, and PRESTO!

    An entire new energy economy.

    • PieInTheSky

      look we just need to magic a few million tons of raw materials is all and we get a billion jobs

    • Homple

      “An Oxford University study last year found that switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy by 2050 could save the global economy around $12 trillion….”

      “There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.
      …George Orwell

    • rhywun

      The delusions would be amusing if they weren’t about to impoverish us.

    • Scruffyy Nerfherder

      Like climate change, peak oil never goes away, it just keeps getting delayed.

    • Chafed

      If it’s an Oxford study it must be right.

    • mexican sharpshooter

      That’s a lot of broken windows.

  7. Sean

    Picked up a prime standing rib roast today. Just under 9 lbs.

  8. The Late P Brooks

    Other recent reports have worked to price in fossil fuels’ hidden costs to nature. Biodiversity and ecological functions, ranging from freshwater filtration to stable food systems, are worth as much as $150 trillion according to a 2021 BCG report, or around twice the value of annual global GDP. But man-made pressures and ecological decay are already costing the global economy $5 trillion a year, the report found.

    While ecological functions are highly valuable to the global economy, markets have yet to fully account for them. Partha Dasgupta, the Cambridge University economist who recently received an elevated knighthood for his seminal 2021 economic review of biodiversity’s value, has argued that markets have so far failed to price in how ecological decay damages economic growth, and conservatively estimates that global nature-damaging subsidies amount to as much as $6 trillion a year.

    When you toss in all these other made up numbers, we can’t afford not to!

    • Stinky Wizzleteats

      Nothing like baked beans in the morning and gas all day. That being said, you’re right. English cuisine, at least regarding breakfasts, is underrated.

    • Gender Traitor

      Needs biscuits and sausage gravy. Don’t know if that’s Appalachian, but it’s definitely southern U.S. And it’s awesome.

      • Gender Traitor

        Also, flash poll: Hash browns or home fries?

      • CPRM

        Crispy grated hash browns. None of that cubed shit.

      • Chafed

        My breakfast potatoes disagree.

      • Shirley Knott

        Yup

      • Gustave Lytton

        Bah. Cubes are where it’s at. Potatoes O’Brien for more flavorful option.

      • mexican sharpshooter

        Hash browns, of course.

      • juris imprudent

        Yes.

      • creech

        With or without pineapple?

      • DEG

        Swinger hash browns vs. monogamous hash browns?

      • Scruffyy Nerfherder

        There’s not much to recommend Appalachian cuisine.

        But a lot more of us are going to get familiar with it, because its primary attribute is its cheapness. Twentieth century Appalachian cuisine was built around having very little to eat.

      • R C Dean

        Much like Chinese cuisine.

    • Gustave Lytton

      Tipper’s channel is awesome. I’ve used it a bunch for recipe suggestions, the bread last weekend. I just roll my eyes when she brings up “foodways” and the like. And Matt is a peach. Makes me think about carrying a fixed blade knife around for chores again.

    • rhywun

      To be fair, destroying is a lot easier than creating. It’s no wonder the left is so good at the former.

    • Scruffyy Nerfherder

      If you raise a firearm at someone, that’s the end of the discussion.

      How the hell did Garza get a jury to convict?

      • Chafed

        Possibly because Perry drove into the crowd. I’m not saying he attacked them. I just think this story may not be as lopsided as often presented. The second half of the New York Post article above tells us more about his actions.

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        He took a wrong turn and got an AK shoved in his grill by a masked nut job after being swarmed by a mob. Sounds like textbook self-defense to me.

      • EvilSheldon

        It’s not a textbook case, which is why he got convicted.

        The prosecution argued that Foster never pointed the rifle at Perry, and – this is important – Perry confirmed that was in the case in his own testimony. If Foster didn’t point the rifle at Perry, then they can argue that there was no intent, which is one of the four requirements to use deadly force in self-defense (the others are Ability, Jeopardy, and Preclusion.) I don’t personally agree with this, I think that Foster demonstrated his intent by showing up at a riot with a mask and a long gun, but that’s the argument they made, and it’s a legally compelling one.

        Stay away from riots, and if you find yourself in one, focus on getting the fuck out of dodge as fast as you can.

      • R C Dean

        Why do I strongly suspect that a non-lefty with a rifle in the ready position, but not quite pointed at somebody, would be deemed to be a legitimate target for a self-defense shooting.

        Even leaving aside that the cops shoot people all the time who merely have a weapon visible, but not actually pointed directly at someone.

        Bottom line: nothing is “legally compelling” unless the law is applied equally to all.

        Let’s face it: if you have to wait until somebody points a gun directly at you, you have little chance of winning both the gunfight and the criminal charge.

        “Stay away from riots, and if you find yourself in one, focus on getting the fuck out of dodge as fast as you can.”

        Good advice, but with radical nut jobs randomly blocking traffic, that can be hard to do if luck doesn’t smile on you.

      • juris imprudent

        cops shoot people all the time who merely have a weapon visible

        Or sometimes an invisible weapon.

      • Q Continuum

        “nothing is “legally compelling” unless the law is applied equally to all”

        Blind justice? Sounds racist.

      • Q Continuum

        Being less snarky, I don’t like the new rules any more than anyone else here but they are what they are. We now have an obvious two-tiered justice system, just get used to it and adapt.

        Lynching was an outrageous injustice, but all the same, if I were a black man in the late 1800’s, I would avoid talking to white women out of self-preservation.

      • EvilSheldon

        “Why do I strongly suspect that a non-lefty with a rifle in the ready position, but not quite pointed at somebody, would be deemed to be a legitimate target for a self-defense shooting.” I’ve seen little indication that this is the case. I’ve been present at events where there were a shitload of non-lefty types with rifles carried at the ready, and none of them were shot, even in the presence of lefty counter-protesters. Kyle Rittenhouse carried his rifle in a similar way, and the self-defense claims of his attackers (quite rightly) went nowhere.

        There may be cases of lefty prosecutors protecting lefty rioters when they get clipped, but I don’t think that this is a good example of one.

        “Even leaving aside that the cops shoot people all the time who merely have a weapon visible, but not actually pointed directly at someone.” Yes, I’m aware that the cops are basically gangsters with badges.

        “Let’s face it: if you have to wait until somebody points a gun directly at you, you have little chance of winning both the gunfight and the criminal charge.” Two points. First, intent can be demonstrated other ways – pounding on the car, verbal threats, et cetera. Second, I know of about a dozen self defense cases where the defender drew on a drawn gun and shot their assailant, all without taking a bullet in return. It’s much more possible than most people believe.

      • juris imprudent

        We now have an obvious two-tiered justice system, just get used to it and adapt.

        Nope. When pushed I will shove.

      • R C Dean

        “Second, I know of about a dozen self defense cases where the defender drew on a drawn gun and shot their assailant, all without taking a bullet in return.”

        I’ll assume the defender wasn’t charged, tried, and convicted. Regardless, that’s not the standard in Austin (and in who knows what other jurisdictions). In Tucson (Tucson!), I would not want to bet my future on a prosecutor declining to press charges in the same situation.

        And no, of course this isn’t an example of a lefty prosecutor protecting a lefty rioter, because this is an example of a lefty prosecutor going after a non-lefty. There are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of lefty prosecutors protecting lefty rioters. That’s the point.

      • DEG

        Why do I strongly suspect that a non-lefty with a rifle in the ready position, but not quite pointed at somebody, would be deemed to be a legitimate target for a self-defense shooting.

        I suspect the same thing.

      • Q Continuum

        “Stay away from riots, and if you find yourself in one, focus on getting the fuck out of dodge as fast as you can”

        ^^^This.

        I have sympathy for Perry given that:
        1. He was an Uber driver ostensibly following the GPS
        2. It’s easy to dissect these cases in a courtroom when the decisions in the moment are split-second
        3. I generally think that rioters of any political persuasion are scum

        But in SHTF scenarios (of which riots are a microcosm) the best course of action is always to avoid trouble.

      • EvilSheldon

        I’m sympathetic too. I’ll say it again, I do think that Foster presented a deadly threat, and I think that Perry was fully within his rights to shoot him dead. But his solution clearly wasn’t the ideal one.

        As to point 1, blindly following your GPS is a good way to end up in a bad situation. Drive with your head up, always. The signs of a developing riot aren’t too hard to read.

      • R C Dean

        “The signs of a developing riot aren’t too hard to read.”

        Having never been in the vicinity of one, I couldn’t say for sure. But they can blow up fast and tend to be very localized. Based on a couple of conversations with people in the vicinity of Tucson’s George Floyd riot, I think it’s mostly luck – a block, a handful of minutes, are the margin of safety.

        Personally, I never go close to an urban center unless I have a very good reason to be there. Generally involving either somebody paying me, or the possibility of getting paid.

        So, if Perry presented a deadly threat, and the car was mobbed, what would be the ideal solution? Run over people to get away?

      • DEG

        “The signs of a developing riot aren’t too hard to read.”

        Having never been in the vicinity of one, I couldn’t say for sure.

        When I was in Ecuador visiting some relatives, we were near the city center of where they lived. We heard noise of lots of people off in the distance. We walked over, and there was a mass protest in front of a government building. It turns out, it was a tax protest. I saw the huge number of cops around the government building and the helicopter flying around. I told my relatives, “Let’s get out of here.” Pretty soon after I said that, we left. No riot, but I really didn’t want to be stuck in one in Ecuador.

      • Q Continuum

        “the possibility of getting paid laid”

        FIFY.

      • R C Dean

        You do you, Q. But if she wants the Dean Meat, she can come to me.

      • R C Dean

        Just to be clear: I think you are accurately describing the legal pretext used by the prosecutor, judge, and jury to reach a verdict they desperately wanted to reach. I’m just saying it is no more than a pretext of the sort you will find in broken legal systems.

        The people who mobbed his car were guilty of a felony – unlawful imprisonment. And very likely other crimes having to do with impeding traffic. When somebody who is already committing a felony rolls up with a rifle in the ready position (that is, not quite aimed at me, but actually, in this case, its entirely possible that he muzzled the guy in the car, based on the photo I have seen), then I think its well over the line to “reasonable fear”.

        Remember – the guy in Charlotte was threatened by somebody with a gun. He ran over people to get away. How’d that work out for him? It’s foolish to get too wrapped up in legal nuance when the court you are in doesn’t give a shit, and just wants you to go down for hard time.

        Sadly, this isn’t something that an appellate court will rule on.

      • DrOtto

        He was Ubering/Lyfting as a side hustle on his way to pick up a fare. That keeps getting conveniently left out. At the time, protesters were illegally blocking streets/highways in that area and intimidating motorists who they came upon. Also, Perry lived on Fort Hood and was just commuting to Austin for the Uber/Lyft gig on weekends and may not have been familiar with the region.

      • DrOtto

        See also the Ukranian truck driver who accidentally drove into a crowd on I35W in Mpls in the early days of these protests who got dragged out of his cab and beaten and originally criminally charged, but I believe the charges were dropped.

      • Gustave Lytton

        Same way as the DA in Portland prosecuted righties for threatening antifa after armed antifa thugs followed the righties to their revised protest location. Or the homeowner who got tired of the armed thugs taking over his neighborhood.

  9. The Late P Brooks

    “Army Sgt. Daniel Perry convicted of killing BLM protester Garrett Foster at Texas rally”

    He should have just floored it through/over them.

    • Sean

      Don’t play in the street.

    • Stinky Wizzleteats

      And then the guy with the AK puts a magazine’s worth into your back.

    • EvilSheldon

      Excellent way to disable your own vehicle. Probably better to reverse and get moving backwards while there’s still some clear space. Cracking the sunroof long enough to toss a smoke+OC grenade combo might also help.

  10. Gustave Lytton

    Walmart is shooting themselves in the foot. Like Amazon, their listing are getting overran with scam artists.

    They’re also no longer shipping a lot of items and pushing for local delivery/pickup. Which sucks for getting regional items out of region. I want my goddam self rising flour and nekot wafers.

  11. mexican sharpshooter

    So while coaching my son’s baseball team today, I had to skip over a kid in the lineup. Took a piss. No problem I penciled him in when he got back. The next time he came up in the lineup he went up in his slot. Batting 5th. Nope, the other coach complained, and said he’s batting 8th. Then he showed me his scorecard… That dork was keeping score for both teams. He insisted the kid bat 8th since that’s what he had on the card.

    “But I have him here batting 8th.”

    “So?”

    It doesn’t help its the coach I think is a moron, on the team I can’t stand.

    • dbleagle

      Ahhh your league has a team named the Yankees as well.

      I was playing 1960s Little League in Arizona and one of the teams was named for the Yankees. That team felt just as entitled as the MLB Yankees. (I was on the Cubs as we were as bad as our name sake.)

    • Stinky Wizzleteats

      The link, she is broken.

      • juris imprudent
  12. R C Dean

    Oh, and I would definitely give this beer a go. I like Belgian beer, and I have no objection to spicing beer holiday-style.

  13. dbleagle

    Our usual Sunday racing was moved to today. Not sure why since tomorrow is just the 1st Sunday following the 1st full moon after the equinox. But we have some good Trades today and they might get to really pumping by this afternoon. I hope everyone has a great day and I am out out of here until this evening.

    • Sensei

      Fair winds and following seas.

  14. Sean

    Any other couples here swap Easter baskets? Or am I and my gf the only ones?

    • R C Dean

      Is that a euphemism? Because if so . . . Maybe.

      • Sean

        No euphemism. Shes getting sugar free candy and HK mags.

      • R C Dean

        Awww.

        Reminds me of Mrs. Dean’s wedding present: an Sig Sauer P228.

      • Sean

        😃

    • Q Continuum

      What about Jooz?

      • juris imprudent

        She said irreligious, doesn’t that count?

    • R C Dean

      Confident prediction: Nobody will be charged for any of the multiple felonies caught on video.

      This part of the story really gives the game away:

      “I raced against Thomas in March 2022 in the 200 freestyle. We tied. We finished at the exact same moment down to 100ths of a second.

      But after we stepped down from the awards podium, an NCAA official looked at both Thomas and me and said, ‘Great job, you tied. But we don’t account for ties. So, the trophy goes to Lia.’”

      • rhywun

        It’s going to get interesting when BIPOCs start losing status to trannies.

        Your company’s executive board is going to look like the cast of RuPaul’s Drag Race.

      • Chafed

        Lol. You’re right.

      • R C Dean

        I would be seriously debating the impact on my career (if I still had one) of asking my CEO (a bog-standard follower of MSNBC leftism) what we were doing to recruit trannies to our executive team and board of trustees. I mean, c’mon, we don’t have a single tranny in either the c-suite or the boardroom! How can we say we DEI is our highest priority?

      • whiz

        “I raced against Thomas in March 2022 in the 200 freestyle. We tied. We finished at the exact same moment down to 100ths of a second.

        But after we stepped down from the awards podium, an NCAA official looked at both Thomas and me and said, ‘Great job, you tied. But we don’t account for ties. So, the trophy goes to Lia.’”

        This sounded fishy, so I looked on the NCAA website and for that race, Thomas and Gaines were listed as tied for 5th, with each getting team points split between 5th and 6th. So I don’t see any indication of a preference there, and they do account for ties.

    • EvilSheldon

      Oooooh.

      Is the 2023 Land Cruiser still a V8? I’m still a little pissed at Toyota for no longer offering the 5.7L V8 in the Tundra…

      • Scruffyy Nerfherder

        The 2023 Land Cruiser doesn’t exist. They discontinued it.

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        Still available in Lexus form I think but, you know, $$$.

  15. DEG

    The basketball players are smart to decline the invitation. Though on the other hand, they’re too old to have their hair sniffed.

    A Christmas beer on Easter? Deal with it. This was inspired by a dessert known as Poire à la Beaujolaise. This is densely packed Belgian style quad that is heavily spiced like one might expect a Christmas Ale to be. Not as carbonated as expected, maybe a bit fruity, but it packs quite a punch. Pair it with holiday faire and/or the drudgery of the day. The Bruery Partridge in a Pear Tree Quadruppel Ale: 3.9/5

    Sounds delicious.

    • Tres Cool

      I was going to add, not knowing Biden’s statute, that they’re likely too tall to be sniffed.
      Seems he likes to lean-in on the young girls.

  16. Gustave Lytton

    Stupid state liquor system. They seem to have a grudge against 200ml bottle size. And I can guess why.

    • R.J.

      It’s measured in the accursed metric system instead of God’s own ounces?

  17. Tres Cool

    Animal on April 8, 2023 at 11:34 am
    Well. I’ve been published at RedState.

    Good for you and nice read.

    However, Ive been published at more highly-esteemed sites. I dont mean to drop names but Craigslist is one.
    That gets you laid more than RedState.

    • Chafed

      I’m still waiting for your article with at least some of your ads.

      • Mojeaux

        Me too. I am in possession of some of them, but alas, I cannot publish without permission.

      • Tres Cool

        Meh. It reads like a pamphlet.

        …unless I provide the story that accompanied each

        Actual Fact- Jugsy was snagged from the CL pond and was only supposed to be a “one-and-done”.
        And here we are almost 11 years later, still together.

      • Chafed

        So be Thomas Paine. We want the pamphlet! We want the pamphlet! We want the pamphlet!

  18. Gustave Lytton

    Wifey: “when you make the [tuna] casserole, could you put a couple of tater tots on top? Just to try it to see what it’s like.”

    “So hotdish…”

    “What’s hotdish?”

    • Gender Traitor

      “Why, YOU, of course, honey!”

    • Ted S.

      Ben and Jerry are going to jave the n*ggers voting Democratic for 200 years?