1520 Main – Chapters 35-36

by | May 26, 2023 | Fiction, Prohibition | 51 comments

Prologue | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20A | 20B | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25-26 | 27 | 28-29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34


PART I
SPEAKING IN TONGUES


35

“MARINA,” DOT WHISPERED in the dark, “are you still awake?”

Marina was trying to be quiet about her weeping, but she wasn’t succeeding. Dot knew. All this time, she knew and never told her. She’d been trying to protect her to keep that from happening, but she wouldn’t tell her.

“I can’t sleep.”

Dot sat on the edge of her bed, the one she only used a couple of hours a night, stroking Marina’s forehead. “Don’t cry. It’s not your fault.”

Yes, it was. She had not been in full control of herself. But she was stupid, so of course she couldn’t discern anything wrong. It was a mystery she could not have unraveled herself because she didn’t have enough clues. And the biggest was how babies were made.

Marina was horrified by the things Sister Albright told her and refused to believe that it was done in that disgusting, horrible way, and furthermore, that Marina was thought to have done this. With Trey. She had the flu! Why wouldn’t anybody believe her?

Sister Albright had gone to get one of Bishop Albright’s veterinary textbooks and showed her how puppies were made. Marina had scrambled off the bed and into the bathroom to heave into the toilet. She had nothing in her stomach.

“I would never do that!” she wailed. “Not even if I were married.”

“You would if you were drugged.”

“What?”

“There are drugs that make you want to do it very badly and there are drugs that make you forget. I don’t know of any that make you want to do it and forget. Do you remember anything off about the way your soda tasted those times, before you had those strange dreams?”

“No.”

She ran off and came back with a bottle of whisky, which was shocking enough, but she uncorked it and waved it under Marina’s nose.

She promptly ran to the bathroom again, unable to get that rotten-corn smell out of her nose.

When she returned, Sister Albright was waiting for her. “Wasn’t liquor.”

“I thought—” she squeaked. “I thought you didn’t drink?”

“We don’t. We use it to sterilize wounds and mix poultices. You may see chew in our house, too. That is also for wounds, to draw out infection. Bishop doesn’t like to lance if he doesn’t have to.”

Marina wouldn’t want to have a wound lanced, either. “I thought medicinal whisky was an excuse to drink. And it’s illegal.”

“Well!” she said briskly. “Shooting Mormons on sight is state law, but you wouldn’t do it, would you?”

Marina got the point: It was a bad law.

“You’d need a lot of straight whisky to make you forget. Spanish fly isn’t strong enough to make you that horn— Um, willing to have sex.”

Marina winced away from that phrase. It was so awful and ugly. “Spanish flu?”

“Fly. And it doesn’t make you forget. I do not believe what you dreamt were actual dreams, but if you were drugged, they would seem like dreams. And since you didn’t know how it’s done, your mind turned it all into something it could understand.”

“How— How do you know all these things?” Marina whispered, seeing Sister Albright in a whole new way. “About drugs and liquor, and, and, and … ”

“Dot never told you?” she asked, surprised. “Once upon a time, I was a flapper.”

Marina gasped and tried to scoot away, but she was in pain and had no space to move over anyway.

Sister Albright smiled mischievously and her eyes twinkled. “Repentance?” she teased gently. “Forgiveness? Grace? Mercy?”

Marina tried to breathe through her horror. Then she realized that her indecency with Trey was her own sin and she wished to be forgiven. “I— I’m sorry,” she whispered. “I don’t mean to judge.”

“Sometimes grieving feels like judgment, and grief isn’t just for death.”

Marina would figure that out later.

“Anyway. You aren’t the first girl we’ve fostered who had no idea how she got pregnant, and you won’t be the last, but we’ve never had any who forgot doing it. I’ll have to ask Bishop if he’s ever heard of such a thing.”

“You talk to him about such things?” she squeaked. “He’ll know?!” She moaned and almost started crying again.

“He’s a doctor,” Sister Albright said wryly. “And once upon a time, he was a bootlegger. It was how we met. We got married about a week before Dot was born.”

“Dot knows about all these things too?” Her register climbed.

“Of course. How can you avoid sin if you don’t know what it is? That’s how girls get in trouble, not knowing.”

“You … you’re not mad?”

“Not at you.”

“Trey did this to me?”

“He got you pregnant, yes. The rest doesn’t make sense.”

“How?”

She was suddenly uncomfortable. “Ah, well, that is to say, he was courting you for two months. He … had to have a reason.”

Marina bowed her head. “Because why else would he want to court me?” she whispered.

“I didn’t say that,” Sister Albright protested weakly.

“You didn’t have to.”

“Marina,” she huffed, “if he just wanted to have sex with you, he wouldn’t have bothered to wait two months. He’d have drugged you first thing. He could have also raped you, but he didn’t do that, either. You like mysteries. I do too. So think of it this way: There are two mysteries. Why and why wait? We need more information to sort all this out, and that’s up to Bishop to gather. Until then, we need to wait.”

 

36

THE SUMMONS TO the Jackson County Democratic Club came at possibly the most inconvenient time, which was as Trey was beating Solly Weissman half to death for assaulting one of his girls after she’d refused his business.

The first time Solly tried it, Trey had politely explained that just because his girls were whores didn’t mean they were there for the taking. He reminded Solly that his girls were expensive for a reason, and that Trey allowed them to refuse service to anyone for any reason because there were always more where he came from.

Now Solly, being one of Boss Tom’s enforcers, was a very big man, going on three hundred pounds at least, and taller than Trey. But Trey was strong and lean from slinging cases of whisky around every day, so when Solly attempted to throw his weight around, thinking Boss Tom would take his side over Trey’s, he politely reminded Solly that Boss Tom liked the money Trey made, and happy whores made more money.

When Solly decided to try to enforce his right to Trey’s girl, Trey had politely bashed “Cutcherheadoff”’s head into the table so hard it bounced, then dragged him out back to make his point.

Trey had bested Solly in front of Lazia, Carrollo, and a few cogs in the Machine, and here he was, out in the back alley, still pounding the motherfucker’s face in. If Solly didn’t have a raging hatred for Trey before, he would now.

“I’ll finish him,” Brody muttered, hauling Trey back by his scruff. “Boss Tom said now.”

And when Boss Tom said now …

“Did he say what for?”

“Naw.”

Trey bolted down the alley and sprinted three blocks until he was within half a block. He stopped, caught his breath, and proceeded to saunter up the stairs and right on into Boss Tom’s office.

“Yeah, Boss.” Trey barely managed to catch whatever Boss Tom had launched at him. He looked down at a set of keys. “Whats’iss? You called me down here for a lost’n’found?” He didn’t know what to expect when he looked up at Pendergast but his boss’s expression of rage was not it.

“Got word Marina Scarritt is living with the Albrights.”

Trey wasn’t smart enough to put that together immediately.

“Scarritt just couldn’t put the girl on a train, could he?” Boss Tom barked, standing to pace his considerable bulk across the floor. “No!”

“Boss, got no idea what you’re talkin’ about.”

He jerked his head toward the window. “You won. 1520’s yours.”

Trey’s mouth dropped open. “She’s … It’s … It ain’t even been a month since the last time I was with her.”

“Yeah, well, I know when the first time you were with her was.”

“Then you know I was only with her three times.” Nine if he counted multiples. Given that, there was only one reason she’d be living with the Albrights now. As Trey rubbed his chin, the only thing he could think about was how much he missed the sweet girl he’d spent so much time with. The other one, he could barely remember at all. Hope began to gather in his chest and he began to grin. “Well, hot damn! Now I can marry the girl.”

“You marry her and I’ll torch it.”

Trey’s mouth dropped open. “The condition was I wasn’t to marry her first. You didn’t say nothin’ about marryin’ her after an’ I had no reason to want to then. Now I do an’ it ain’t because she’s pregnant, but never no mind about the fact that the kid’s mine.”

“You got the gin mill. You don’t get the girl too.”

My. Kid.

“Find some other way to provide for it, then, but marry her and the whole thing is pointless.”

“Is Scarritt gonna get run out of his situation?”

Boss Tom hesitated. “It’s cooking.”

“Then it wasn’t pointless.”

“It didn’t happen the way I wanted it to!” Boss Tom barked.

“What did he do to you that it was worth 1520?” Trey demanded.

Boss Tom squinted at him. Trey backed off physically, his hands in the air. “No disrespect intended, Boss,” Trey said as penitently as he could muster. He hoped it was enough.

“Hrmph.” Penitent enough then. Good. “Gimme the keys back, you can have the girl and continue on as if the only thing that changed was you got married and you have a wife and kid to go home to after closing time.”

“That ain’t gonna work,” Trey said flatly.

“Why not?

“You’re pissed that I won and you’d be lookin’ for a reason to fire me or keep me busy elsewhere. Lazia wants the speak, so it wouldn’t be long until one of his flunkies gets my job, no matter what he says about keepin’ me on. Even if he did keep me on, it would make me fair game for either Carrollo or Solly or both. Or I could give it up for Marina and my baby. Either way, my people are toast.”

Boss Tom cocked his head and looked at him strangely. “You’d do that? Give it up for her? Even if I gave you my word nothing would change?”

“I don’t believe you.” When Boss Tom’s nostrils flared, Trey said, “That ain’t a knock on you. Just life, things changin’ too fast, ’specially in our business. I got no good options when I made a deal with my people an’ already went back on it ’cuz I couldn’t look myself in the mirror for what I was doin’. Who’d’a predicted that, me growin’ a conscience?”

“What do you mean, you grew a conscience?” Boss Tom growled. Shit. Trey hadn’t gotten around to informing him of his change of heart.

Trey stuck his tongue in his cheek. “Uh … ”

“Are you telling me you didn’t intend to get it done at all?”

Trey held up the keys and jangled them. “But I did. Now I have a better footing to protect my people and they have a better reason to be loyal.”

“This is about the Terranova kid, isn’t it?” Trey hated that he knew who Gio really was. “Atlantic City was buzzing with where he went and why. The gossip was not kind to the family, being unable to control their people. So it’d be very easy for me to get Giuseppe Morello out here to meet your maître d’.”

“I’m small time. Last thing I want’s to attract the attention of the Black Hand.”

“Marina or Matteo Terranova. Choose wisely.”

Trey closed his hand over the keys and drawled, “Nice doin’ business with ya, Boss.”

35-36


If you don’t want to wait 2 years to get to the end, you can buy it here.

Speakeasy staff.

About The Author

Mojeaux

Mojeaux

Aspiring odalisque.

51 Comments

  1. juris imprudent

    No answer as to why Scarritt pissed off the boss? He never intended to run a fair deal. Trey better have a quick exit.

    • DEG

      I don’t remember if Boss Tom has or had a wife. If so, that’s the obvious thing.

      • Mojeaux

        Yes and two daughters, and I think a step/son? For the purposes of the book, I only cared about the girls.

      • DEG

        Ahhh….

    • Chafed

      That’s way too close to the truth.

    • Mojeaux

      Link in links post.

    • Ted S.

      We’re not.

      • rhywun

        👍🏻

  2. DEG

    I should have seen the drugging. Trey called Marina a “natural” at sex. I doubt a girl like Marina would be like that. Too many hang-ups.

    • Mojeaux

      It’s okay. You’re not supposed to guess, although Sean and Spud did last week. The sex episodes are supposed to feel almost surreal.

      • DEG

        I was catching up on some old threads. I saw the news on yesterday’s afternoon links. Congratulations!

      • Mojeaux

        Thank you!

  3. Sean

    So many unanswered questions so far. Great story.

    • Ted S.

      He used a paywall to keep the secrets?

      • Chafed

        Why do you hate success?

  4. juris imprudent

    A most pleasant evening on the zoom with ya’ll. I now have to scrub down and triple-mouthwash before I’m allowed in bed. She is not a fan of second-hand cigar smoke.

    • R.J.

      Oh darn. Sorry I missed you.

  5. rhywun

    Ugh. Hotel TV so just watching what is there.

    I had no idea the 2nd reboot Trek was a rewrite of Khan! with everything switched around. It robs the thing of any dramitic impact.

    • one true athena

      Into Darkness was so maddening. There is a core of something interesting there. But as always, JJ went with bland carboncopy for nostalgia’s sake, without understanding why it worked in the first place, same as he did for Force Awakens. Have Cumberbatch play a Khan follower trying to find/free him and the entire plot unfolds more naturally, but instead, JJ forced the movie into duplicating Wrath of Khan. sigh.

      Though I do hold some fond memories of that movie for another reason which was pretty funny:

      I was driving my kid to his school and there was a big set up in an empty field. “oh, huh, wonder what that is.” The next day, there’s a huge — 100 ft by thirty ft high– green screen visible from the road. “oh it’s a film shoot! interesting” says me. I live in LA, it’s not that rare, so I didn’t think much of it. Two days later, I see a leaked set photo of Cumberbatch on some familiar “debris” in front of a huge green screen, and I realize- “oh they’re filming Into Darkness right there!”

      Well, JJ Abrams is notoriously PISSED at spoilers/set leaks, and overnight, after the picture comes out, there’s a giant fence around the set. Another picture comes out. The day after that, shipping containers are stacked in a fence around the set, two high, all around so you can’t see anything from the road.

      But the next day? They’re gone. The field is empty. lol

      • rhywun

        The whole filming style looks like it could have been shat out of a computer to me. The Miami Beach aesthetic was ridiculous. It was so off putting.

      • Chafed

        You are both right.

  6. Brochettaward

    Here he comes, and the crowd cannot wait…

    The Bro

    The Bro

    The Brochettaward

  7. Timeloose

    Hello all.

    No time for Zooming tonight. It’s been a long week.

    I’ll try to check in this weekend with you all.

    I’ll leave you all with my last song of my night.

    This song reminds me of my beautiful wife.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cvIjQSFLb3U

    • rhywun

      Nice. I don’t think ive heard that since Wonder Years or something.

      • Toxteth O'Grady

        Boogie Nights?

  8. Brochettaward

    I feel like one day they will make live action movies about my Firsts, but they will need a lot of CGI to make that a reality. It will be sort of like the Disney remakes.

  9. LCDR_Fish

    Proving that Jonah Goldberg can still pull out some decent writing every once in a while. (from his weekly newsletter)

    Book Banning Ain’t What It Used To Be

    Content curation isn’t the same as fascism.

    Dear Reader (even those of you who thought it a good idea to invite Bill Clinton to an HR conference),

    Earlier in the week there was one of those stories that helps feed the ravenous maw of perpetual outrage. Ron DeSantis banned a poem by Amanda Gorman. Banned it!

    ….[links]

    It turned out the poem wasn’t banned. It was removed from a shelf in a library “media center” for grade-schoolers and put on a shelf for middle-schoolers.

    That’s it. One school. One library. Moved a book to a different shelf.

    Now, it was dumb for the school to remove it based on a single complaint—or any complaint. But that’s one of the downsides of our ridiculous moment—normal people are so desperate to avoid getting in the crosshairs of controversy, they overreact to controversy that creates even more controversy. It’s the ballad of DeSantis versus Disney in miniature.

    Still, the poem wasn’t banned. It changed shelves.

    I have no doubt that if a precocious fourth grader asked the librarian to see the poem, it would have been made available. But hypothetically, let’s say that’s not the case. Let’s say the school actually pulled it. So what? I mean, I’m 100 percent with you if you think that would be a wrong decision by one librarian in one school in one neighborhood in one county in one state. But beyond “that would be the wrong decision,” what’s the big frickin’ deal? The kid could probably still find the poem. It just might take a little time or money. But that’s it.

    I have no statistics handy, but I am absolutely confident that on any given day, at least 50 kids ask librarians for books that the library doesn’t have, or has loaned-out, or declines to give to kids for a bunch of reasons. “Timmy, I need a note from your mother saying it’s okay for you to read Tropic of Cancer.”

    People lost their minds in part because this happened in Florida where American Orbánism is supposedly flourishing. But Americans have been wildly irrational about book-bans-that-aren’t-bans for decades. Whenever you look into it, it turns out that something like 98 percent of the cases are about libraries or schools being pressured by parents or school boards that object to some controversial book that’s not age appropriate.

    Since the 1960s, the stories are literally never about bans on the sale of books, never mind the possession of them. That matters. That’s what countries that actually ban books do. See what happens if customs finds The Satanic Verses in your luggage at the Tehran airport.

    Now, America used to ban books. Actually, states and cities used to ban books. The federal government, to my knowledge, has never actually banned books, though under the Comstock laws it did prohibit a bunch of “obscene” books from being mailed. (Another reason why UPS and FedEx are limitations on federal power! Down with government control of the means of communication!) The Confederacy did ban Uncle Tom’s Cabin, which is bad. But not anywhere near the top of any known “Things the Confederacy Did That Were Bad” list.

    Boston, before its Puritanism evaporated, banned—I mean really banned—books for a very long time.

    The real problem with all of this “banned” talk is that a bunch of institutions and the journalists who uncritically defer to them, are using the word “ban” wrong. Dictionary.com defines “ban” as “to prohibit, forbid, or bar; interdict.”

    Here’s how PEN America—one of the worst culprits—defines a book ban: “where students’ access to books in school libraries and classrooms in the United States was restricted or diminished, for either limited or indefinite periods of time.” So if your school has a library book sale to clear out old titles and make room for new ones, you’re all mass book-banners.

    Now, I’m not going to defend every decision made in every county or school library in Florida in response to the “Individual Freedom Act,” aka the “Stop Woke Act.” Pulling biographies of Hank Aaron strikes me as stupid.

    But here’s the thing. If the restriction or diminishment of access to books in school libraries or classrooms is defined as “banning” you know who the worst book banners in America are? Librarians and school teachers. Every single day, teachers and librarians decide what books should be available to kids.

    By this definition, the teacher who opts to include Uncle Tom’s Cabin but not To Kill a Mockingbird has banned To Kill a Mockingbird. The school librarian who refuses to keep The Protocols of the Elders of Zion on their shelves has banned that book. Heck, from what I can tell, all three of my books are banned in schools and libraries.

    And that’s fine!

    That’s what librarians and teachers are supposed to do! They are what we call in the digital age, “content moderators.” But because libraries are physical spaces, the content moderation is more tangible because there’s this thing called “limited shelf space.” You can’t carry all the books, so you pick and choose which you’ll keep and which you won’t. Librarians also get to decide which books they make more visible and which ones you need to ask for help to find. That’s not banning, that’s editing or curating or whatever. Museums do the same thing every damn day. The Met isn’t banning George W. Bush’s paintings, it’s just not interested in displaying them. Who gives a furry rat’s behind?

    What PEN and the American Library Association really mean by “banning” is overruling their decisions—or the decisions of their members and allies. If a bunch of parents or school board officials complain about the inappropriateness of a book, the parents might be right or wrong, but that’s not “banning,” it’s democracy in action. Heck the politicians, starting with DeSantis, behind this push have one thing on their side the librarians and teachers don’t: the voters. At least for now. If they go too far, voters will elect different politicians and different decisions will be made. That’s democracy for you.

    What the people screaming about book bans want you to believe is that any effort to second-guess or overrule the “expert” opinions of librarians, teachers, and educrats is fascism. Now, it could be fascism. There were a lot of book bans in fascist regimes, and fascism is fueled by a kind of populism that can look like democratic action you support for a while. But, come on. Moreover, the rush to remove “problematic” books is hardly just a right-wing thing. School boards have removed Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and To Kill a Mockingbird from reading lists and syllabi because they find the language offensive or because To Kill a Mockingbird is a “white savior story.”

    Now, I think getting rid of such books is a terrible idea. I also think it’s a big country and there’s nothing inherently wrong—and much that is inherently good—about parents and politicians taking an interest in what local schools and libraries do. I have zero problem saying the parents are sometimes wrong. The woman who complained about Amanda Gorman’s book apparently peddled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion on her Facebook page, so I’m extra comfortable questioning her judgment. But I also have zero problem saying the librarians are sometimes wrong too.

    But what I can’t stand is the idea that any second-guessing of unelected functionaries is an Orwellian assault on free thought. I loathe the saying “Government is just another word for the things we do together.” But you know what? At the local level, public schools—i.e. government schools—should operate according to something close to the spirit of that idea. Parents and citizens are stakeholders, particularly in the education of their own children. We always hear about the need for more civic engagement and parental involvement, but don’t you dare complain about what’s on your kid’s curriculum.

    Everyone should have to defend their decisions. And shrieking, “You’re a book banner!” if you lose an argument is nothing more than bullying, an attempt to shut down debate, not engage in it. That’s as illiberal as any attempt to influence what’s on library shelves.

    Scary ideas not allowed.

    Speaking of shutting down debate …

    I spend a lot of time lamenting the growing tide of illiberalism on the right. And I’ll continue. But I get a lot of attaboys from progressives who seem to think illiberalism is a uniquely right-wing thing. It’s not. If you think that schools and libraries should be allowed to teach whatever they want, to have exclusive arbitrary power to exclude the books they don’t like but then say, “Don’t you dare try to exclude the books they like,” you are on the illiberal side of the argument—because you don’t think there should be an argument. Liberalism, like democracy, is all about cultivating a high tolerance for disagreement and debate.

    Which brings me to this horrifying story by James Fishback published by our friends at The Free Press.

    Apparently, competitive high school debate is becoming, in meaningful respects, a debate-free zone. Judges promulgate “paradigms” which lay out what they’re looking for from the debaters. It’s supposed to be stuff like “provide evidence to support your position” or “emphasize clarity.” But here’s one such paradigm from Lila Lavender, the 2019 national debate champion:

    Before anything else, including being a debate judge, I am a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist. . . . I cannot check the revolutionary proletarian science at the door when I’m judging. . . . I will no longer evaluate and thus never vote for rightest capitalist-imperialist positions/arguments. . . . Examples of arguments of this nature are as follows: fascism good, capitalism good, imperialist war good, neoliberalism good, defenses of US or otherwise bourgeois nationalism, Zionism or normalizing Israel, colonialism good, US white fascist policing good, etc.

    Now, not all judges are self-declared Marxist-Leninist-Maoists (excuse me while I take a moment to keep my eyes from rolling out of their sockets), and not all of them are even this avowedly illiberal, according to Fishback. But a lot are. And you know what? One is too many. I’m not saying this just because Lavender’s paradigm is so incandescently absurd.

    Though I should dwell here to say that calling yourself a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist may not be as disqualifying as calling yourself German National Socialist, but it’s close enough. By body count alone, the ideologies are at best a wash, with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoists ahead on points.

    Remember that big debate I had with Sarah Isgur about Nazis marching in Skokie? Her position is basically that the law should be viewpoint neutral when it comes to speech. This debate story isn’t a question of constitutional rights, of course. The National Speech & Debate Association can have any rules it wants—because they’re content moderators!

    But when it comes to the spirit of liberalism in general and free speech in particular, declaring yourself a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist is substantively no different than declaring yourself a Nazi. It’s certainly an open declaration against liberalism properly understood. And illiberal debate societies aren’t really a thing.

    This is my problem with viewpoint neutrality. I think grown-ups, by which I mean citizens in a free society, can make judgments about what ideas are beyond the pale. It may get thorny as a matter of constitutional law, but a liberal institution—and a debating society is perhaps the ne plus ultra of liberal institutions—should be able to say, “Get that garbage out of here.”

    Anyway, other judges say that using the word “illegal” in connection with “immigrants” will immediately result in a loss. Another says, “If you are white, don’t run arguments with impacts that primarily affect POC [people of color]. These arguments should belong to the communities they affect.”

    I don’t care if you think the idea that marshaling arguments using logic and facts is inherently illegitimate if you’re the wrong skin color is racist. The fact is it’s illiberal.

    (Also, is it okay to apply this rule to, say, billionaires? I mean proposing laws to abolish billionaires—a trendy leftwing idea—don’t primarily affect the people arguing for the proposition.)

    I’m not an absolutist about such things. I’m the guy who’s just explained—again—that I’m comfortable with libraries and even debating societies discriminating against certain viewpoints.

    My problem is two-fold. First, the discrimination is one-way. Open and flagrantly illiberal ideas and arguments of a leftwing bent are indulged and celebrated. Facts that are inconvenient to privileged narratives are scorned and demonized while arguments like “capitalism can reduce poverty”—an incontestable fact, by the way—are preemptively delegitimized. Not only is this illiberal, it’s cowardly. But it’s cowardice in the name of maintaining power.

    Second, because there is this one-way bias, the actual liberals—yes left-leaning, but still fundamentally liberal—are stuck in an environment where all of the incentives are to demonize the illiberalism of the other side while refusing to confront the ever increasing illiberalism in their own ranks. This not only fuels the demonization of anyone who doesn’t toe the party line, it invites an inevitable backlash and not just from alt right poltroons.

    You want to know why DeSantis and his crew are going full Gramsci about retaking institutions and using governmental power to take back the culture? It’s because liberal institutions—universities, libraries, debating societies—are too illiberal in one direction. How many college admissions people share the same attitude as these judges?

    It’s a rhetorical question.

    • rhywun

      Dude. My thumbs are wore out now.

      • R.J.

        That has to be a record for a re-post

      • LCDR_Fish

        Well, I don’t have a link for it – I don’t actually subscribe to the dispatch, just my emails.

    • Chafed

      Holy wall of text!

    • Lackadaisical

      “Now, it was dumb for the school to remove it based on a single complaint—or any complaint.”

      No, it’s not necessarily wrong to move a book based on a complaint. I don’t know anything about the merits of the case, but it it wasn’t age appropriate, you are actually improving education and listening to consumer preferences. What’s wrong in that?

      You need to know details to say if it’s a good or bad decision on a case by case basis, but parents having a day over education is not bad. Can’t get anything right this guy, whoever he is.

      • Don escaped Texas

        hang on

        No, it’s not necessarily wrong to move a book based on a complaint.
        His whole point is that it is okay to do just that. I think “single complaint” was poor phrasing: he is clearly advocating curation, and some complaint has to be the first one.

        parents having a day over education is not bad.
        He clearly makes that very point. It’s unmissable: he wants the community to have a say or community doesn’t work. Community and institutions are his whole
        shtick; you could not have missed that.

    • Don escaped Texas

      I really like Jonah, but I don’t like all of Jonah’s ideas. That’s basically how I must view everyone or I’d never read anything or have any friends. He’s a good guy who is wrong about a few things, some of which are important.

      What he’s right about above is intellectual honesty: there ain’t much around. But, of course, the thing about liberals and conservatives is they’re all about their institutions, and the real problem with institutions is the generic American problem: the government owns too much of everything. I do not give a good god damn if the yeshiva bans (literally bans) book A, or Our Lady of Longshore Drive School for Constipated Redheads bans book B. The problem is that governments shouldn’t have schools because they shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near children, so, once again, we’re arguing about access to or the management of an institution that shouldn’t exist. Build your own school, pick your books, live happily ever after.

      Remember that big debate I had with Sarah Isgur about Nazis marching in Skokie? Yes, she destroyed you, dear Jonah, because absolute free speech is an easy position to take and defend and all I need to do after that is be okay with all the assholes in the world and their distasteful positions and behaviors and bumperstickers because they are as eternal as death and taxes so tune it out and get on with your life. Sidebar: Nazis can’t march on private streets; I know, I know, it’s not practical and that ship has sailed, but: private streets are a thing (I live on one thank you very much, spent $65k on it last year) and private ownership works which is the true north and panacea we so dearly need.

      I am not a conservative, but also listen to Isgur a lot because she’s intellectually honest. I listen to Moynihan because he’s funny and well-read; I totally get Gillespie because he’s awkward and academic in pretty much the same way I am. There are only a couple of true libertarians out there, and they are generally unbearable, so you compromise,

      and then people grow on you. I’ll drive a couple of thousand miles these two weeks, and Jonah’s Remnant is my main podcast, and his unworkable nirvana is less workable than my unworkable nirvana, but I like him, and I like that he would die a thousand deaths rather than travel with bad people or take intellectual shortcuts or make excuses for very bad people just because of identity politics, and he is absolutely right that Trump is shit and owning the libs has been a stupid posture and pasttime and on balance has cost our country. I’m a better grown-up for listening to Jonah even though I don’t want my son or anyone’s son to die in Ukraine. So, to close, institutions fail, liberty has unpleasant residues, and FoxNews is still a pox.

  10. Chafed

    I’m a little sick, a lot tired, and feeling overworked.

    How is everyone else doing?

    • hayeksplosives

      Sorry you’re under the weather.

      I have a low fever, fatigue, and sniffles. Will be taking it easy this long weekend

      Might go buy a whole chicken and make good ol’ chicken and dumplings this weekend.

      • Chafed

        I missed some of the details when you left your ex. Do you have your cat to cuddle you?

      • hayeksplosives

        Sigh.

        No. When I escaped, I could have taken the two kitties. My apartment allows two. But I couldn’t realistically figure out how could leave with 3 suitcases and two cats, and i didn’t have vet paperwork saying they were ok to fl(y ( I did have their vax records).

        After I settled in here, I offered to take the cats, but we agreed they were better off in a big house, and Felix really likes the yard. So they’re Nevada cats now.

        It does get lonely here. Maybe after my San Antonio trip I will get a kitty. I’m not going to force the issue. Sometimes a cat finds its way into your life unplanned.

  11. Lackadaisical

    Weekend weather going to be great.

    Planning some yard work today (okay, I’m about 1/3 done already, gotta get it over with before it gets hot out) then the beach tomorrow

    • Don escaped Texas

      greetings from Tybee

      which beach?

      • Lackadaisical

        We are planning on fort DeSoto, hoping the crowds won’t be as bad there.

      • Lackadaisical

        How is Tybee? I’ve never heard of it, but it looks fancy (for Georgia :p )

      • Don escaped Texas

        Tybee is a happy dump, a mix of 80 year old buildings in various states of decay and revival. Unlike Corpus or Galveston, poverty isn’t much mixed in; it’s just expensive enough to keep out the wrong people.

        It’s also very American, very libertarian: various states of undress, lots of open booze, pedestrians and cyclists and golf carts and chickens clog the slow, quiet, tiny streets….milling is the gear most ride in.

  12. Lackadaisical

    Economy sucks=stocks up

    What a world.

  13. Lackadaisical

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/yellen-moves-forecast-earliest-potential-203518027.html

    “Yellen had previously said a default could potentially happen as early as June 1, but is now characterizing June 5 as the precise deadline.”

    I had heard some analyses suggesting mid June or even later. The more salient point is there is no reason we would default, we’d just have to stop spending extra, so basically anarchy.

    • Sean

      The Rethuglicans are causing a recession!!!!!!