149 Comments

  1. Tres Cool

    whaddup doh’

    • Nephilium

      Welcome back to the land of the living.

      Now grab a shovel and get to digging.

  2. Tonio

    Happy Friday, everyone!

    • Fourscore

      And a good Friday at that. My middle GD comes tomorrow, promising to bring a cake. Haven’t seen her for close to a year. This past winter was one to shelter in place.

      I’ll try to get her to take some stuff but I’m afraid she won’t. She does like Grandma stuff though.

      • Nephilium

        The standard wisdom (at least in my area), was that the best strudel was the one that grandma made.

    • Riven

      Indeed. Been a long time coming, this Friday.

      • Nephilium

        Can confirm.

      • The Other Kevin

        Agreed. These two-week long weeks need to stop.

      • SDF-7

        Thank you for putting this in my head. My brain excels at random ear worms based on similar phrasing.

      • rhywun

        Dammit! I knew that would have hit me before long.

    • Grosspatzer

      Happy Friday right back atcha! Summer cold came a few weeks early, 3 days of pure misery, but looks like I’ll be better in time for the weekend (and the smoke is back in Canada where it belongs).

      Good tune, although downtown ain’t what it used to be.

      • rhywun

        Good explainer on the phenomenon that caused the smoke-bomb-a-palooza, with City Journal’s usual restrained style being employed to tell the climate cultists “not so fast”.

      • Grosspatzer

        Nice – the stationary low pressure over Nova Scotia which blew the smoke down here for a week is quite unusual, especially in summer months, but it happens every now and then. Surprised the author did not mention controlled burns, or the lack thereof, as a contributing factor. Maybe that doesn’t apply in this specific situation.

      • DEG

        Sorry about the cold. I hope you are right and it goes away before the weekend.

      • Pat

        Summer cold came a few weeks early

        Clearly it’s the deadly corona-chan. This wouldn’t have happened if you got your weekly booster!

  3. Nephilium

    Well, the girlfriend and I are planning on heading out tonight, so I will not be around to kick off and host the standard Zoom.

    Therefore, here be the unmoderated one.

    • KK the Porcine Pearl-Eater

      Possible fireside chat for me tonight. No humidity, no wind, 54 overnight low, and it’s FRIDAY

  4. Dr. Wondertainment’s Mr. Glib®

    OT, but I wanted to give an update. Dad got out the hospital on Wednesday. He had a pacemaker installed and is doing well. His heart ended up being in better shape than the doctors had first thought. Thanks for all the prayers and good thoughts.

    • Nephilium

      No worries. Glad things worked out.

      Feel free to kick up your feet, grab a pint, and hang around a bit.

    • rhywun

      👍

    • Fourscore

      Good to hear

    • Grosspatzer

      Happy things are working out.

    • Sensei

      👌

    • Gender Traitor

      That’s great news, um…

      …whoever you are!! ::glances around self-consciously, skulks away::

      • Dr. Wondertainment’s Mr. Glib®

        Sorry, I never get around to comment on time. I wrote I last week.

      • Tundra

        Welcome. Under the circumstances I’ll wait on the formal greeting.

        Glad to hear Dad is groovy.

    • Tonio

      Glad to hear that.

      Welcome aboard. Somehow I missed your arrival.

      FOT, and all that.

    • DEG

      This is good news.

    • Mojeaux

      Hello, and welcome! (If I haven’t already said it. I don’t remember. I’ve slept.)

    • R C Dean

      Nice ta meet ya.

      You know, you can just drop in to the current post. The worst that will happen is you will catch an inside joke for reposting something that has already been posted.

      • MikeS

        Thanks for mentioning that. I’ve seen others say similar in the past and never understood it. There is always a “live” post (level of activity obviously varies by day/time). Drop into it and chat.

      • rhywun

        Yeah, I don’t even read dead threads let alone post on them.

  5. Shpip

    This illustrates what economist Mancur Olson called the logic of collective action. Because the benefits are concentrated on one small group and the costs are dispersed on one large group, it’s easier for the small group to organize in favor of the policy.

    See: pretty much every single government program in history.

    • Fourscore

      Then a lobbying group starts up to siphon some of the money off in donations.

      AARP has grown and grown. Some old people vote, some old people vote that don’t even know they are voting.

      • Sensei

        That’s ok, we fill the ballots out for them.

      • Dr. Fronkensteen

        “some old people vote that don’t even know they are voting.” But enough about our President.

        The insidious part about this is that everyone has their hand in everyone else’s pocket. Nobody wants to be the first to lose their benefit.
        And good luck getting the government to cut benefits drastically for everyone at the same time.

  6. Winston

    https://fee.org/articles/is-building-free-market-cities-an-effective-tool-for-economic-liberty/

    Finally, cities do not create a cultural environment where people support liberty.

    Hayek, in The Constitution of Liberty, wrote:

    “It is not to be denied that modern developments, especially the development of the large city, have destroyed much of the feeling of responsibility for local concerns which in the past led to much beneficial and spontaneous common action.”

    There is significant empirical evidence that people in cities are more pro-government than people in rural areas. This appears to be true in almost every country.

    ….

    There are many reasons why people living in rural areas might be more skeptical of big government. First, rural areas are physically further away from the centers of power. Second, living closer to nature breeds self reliance. Finally, rural areas tend to be more religious.

    Finally, someone speaks to me! 😉

    Another reason I think cities are hotbeds of statism is due to the fact that modern urban life has been heavily dependent on local government for quite some time. Governments run water, sewers, garbage, electricity, public transit, schools, muhroads etc. Since modern urbanites are dependent on the state right now why would they support laissez-faire economics?

    Also this has been a problem since the 1880s at least and have libertarians found a solution yet? The Mao or Pol Pot solutions have not worked, to be but it mildly.

    • slumbrew

      Hey, everybody, it’s Winston!

      • WTF

        He’s here because his mom is “entertaining guests “.

    • Pat

      Governments run water, sewers, garbage, electricity, public transit, schools, muhroads etc. Since modern urbanites are dependent on the state right now why would they support laissez-faire economics?

      A case in point: I can’t remember off hand who it was, but at the old site there was a self-described “individualist anarchist” city slicker who got dogpiled for supporting the city government on an article about how NYC was fining (with sufficient fines resulting in jail time) homeowners for not shoveling the snow off of the ostensibly public, city-owned sidewalks in front of their ostensibly-private homes.

      • DEG

        Niki.

      • DEG

        Or was it Nicole?

        Can’t remember.

      • slumbrew

        Nikki, I think?

        All I remember is that she was the worst.

      • Pat

        Lol, I remember the “Nikki is the worst” meme, but had forgotten that was who took up that argument.

      • rhywun

        It is an odd situation. The government does not repair or shovel or provide liability for accidents on sidewalks, so how can they claim to own them.

      • Ownbestenemy

        It’s your duty shovel it!
        It’s my land, no!
        Awe, so cute you think you actually own this?

  7. The Late P Brooks

    Happy Friday, everyone!

    Just back from two hour trip to DMV. It should get happy-ER, anyway.

  8. cyto

    Do you think they are actually trying to destroy the country?

    I mean, it is so painfully obvious that the putative democratic structure is a fiction. Biden clearly isn’t a president in any meaningful way. We have known him for 4 decades as a national figure. None of his current administration is consistent with what we know of him. His background of bribery and the protection of the FBI gives a hint as to the mechanisms at work.

    But the repeated “in your face” nature of political prosecutions and the two decades of not even bothering to have a real budget process scream the lack of legitimacy from the rooftops.

    They have been screaming “Hitler” and “dictator” and “fascist” at everything that opposes them, including free speech, keeping and bearing arms and self defense.

    They are doing their level best to impersonate a 3rd world revolutionary dictatorship.

    • Winston

      Soon it won’t be an impersonation.

    • Winston

      Yes. The Great Reset. Our elites think we need less people using less resources and that AI and robots will render most of the world population obsolete.

      • juris imprudent

        I love how they think that this time the revolution won’t eat its own.

    • Pat

      But the repeated “in your face” nature of political prosecutions and the two decades of not even bothering to have a real budget process scream the lack of legitimacy from the rooftops.

      The Soviets had this down to an art and science. It’s not accidental, it’s intended to demoralize, and the longer people go along with it, the more demoralized they become, because they’re participants in the lies. You lose any moral high ground from which to oppose that in which you willfully participated. Every time they make you repeat a falsehood that you know is a falsehood, that they know is a falsehood, that they know you know is a falsehood, and that you know they know is a falsehood, you lose a little slice of your soul. Solzhenitsyn captured both the methods and the psychological trauma of it very well. I’ve linked it a million times because it’s such a great essay for these times, but Live Not By Lies should be mandatory reading.

      • slumbrew

        In the same vein, by Dalrymple:

        Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

      • Drake

        ☝️

      • juris imprudent

        The most curious thing is that those who want to humiliate — racist! sexist! transphobe! — are expecting to invoke shame in their target, when they themselves have absolutely no sense of shame. They are terrified of being found non-conformist, but that is exclusion from the body.

      • R C Dean

        “OK, pronoun person, let’s say, hypothetically, I am incapable of shame. What’s your next move?”

    • rhywun

      And it leaves the door wide open for the epic levels of insanity pouring forth from the left side of the populace.

  9. DEG

    In other words, the Treasury took out a loan (issued a bond), the Federal Reserve buys the bond from the group that gave the government a loan, and the Federal Reserve gives the treasury back all the interest it has to pay on the loan. This amounts to something like an interest-free loan the government was able to give itself, and it is only possible because of the money creation by the Federal Reserve.

    Seems a bit complicated. Or, perfect for a government solution.

    • creech

      How does Fed pay it’s bills of it gives up all the interest income?

      • R C Dean

        They hold a lot of other assets. A lot. Mortgage backed securities and students loans come to mind. They also provide various financing vehicles to banks, which I’m sure pays.

      • DEG

        We cut the Fed out. Get rid of the middleman.

        I’m certain we can come up with some other grift for them.

  10. DEG

    Report from the NH House. This is about the session where the House passed the budget. The budget, and the session, are a mixed bag.

    We learned that Republican attendance still put them in the minority today as compared to the Democrat caucus. With 8 Republican members out, and 4 on the Dem side, it put the numbers around 191D-187R in the morning and hovering around 188D-182R later in the day. It is the reason some nanny state bills passed today.

    • Pat

      So let me understand. These clowns went out and campaigned, raised a whole bunch of Other People’s Money, got themselves elected, and then couldn’t be fucked to show up on tight votes? Well done, guys.

      • DEG

        Sortof. NH House candidates generally spend their own money on their campaigns. That is slowly changing.

        The NH House averages 25 absences on session days. This is above average attendance.

        There are vacancies too right now. I thought there were three vacancies (400 total state representatives if there are no vacancies), so I think Judy Aron’s attendance numbers might be off. Even so, still above average attendance.

        But yeah, other than the money bit, you’re right.

  11. DEG

    More on the NH budget

    State House watchers were stunned Thursday when the narrowly-divided House of Representatives swiftly and overwhelmingly voted to accept the $15.2 billion state budget sent over by the Senate, an unusual move that prevents a protracted battle and gives both sides political wins to take home to voters.

    Just a week ago, the halls of the House were swirling with rumors of a plan by some in the Democratic caucus to blow up the budget, perhaps even force Republican House Speaker Sherm Packard (R-Londonderry) out of his job. House sources told NHJournal it was motivated by Democrats’ desire to disrupt popular Gov. Chris Sununu’s plans to run for president.

    But on Monday, Sununu announced he was sitting out the 2024 GOP presidential primary, and on Wednesday, the state Senate voted 24-0 to pass a budget and send it to the House, where all but 19 Democrats present voted to pass it.

    Coincidence, or something more?

    House Bill 1 passed on a 351-25 vote. House Bill 2 passed on a 326-53 vote. “I believe we kind of just made history,” Packard said after the vote. “This chamber deserves a lot of congratulations.”

  12. DEG

    NH Education Freedom accounts expanded

    In a blow to school choice opponents, the New Hampshire Senate passed HB 367 in a 14-10 party-line vote Wednesday, expanding eligibility for the popular Education Freedom Account (EFA) program.

    With Gov. Chris Sununu expected to sign it into law, HB 367 will expand eligibility for the EFA program from families making no more than 300 percent of the federal poverty level to households with income at or below 350 percent of the federal poverty level.

    That is a 16.7 percent increase in the EFA income eligibility cap.

    “This win is a great step in the right direction toward empowering New Hampshire families with education freedom,” Corey DeAngelis, a national advocate of school choice and executive director of the Educational Freedom Institute, told NHJournal.

  13. Winston

    https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Earth-Hunger_and_Other_Essays/What_Our_Boys_are_Reading

    Few gentlemen who have occasion to visit news offices can have failed to notice the periodical literature for boys, which has been growing up during the last few years. The increase in the number of these papers and magazines, and the appearance from time to time of new ones which, to judge by the pictures, are always worse than the old, seem to indicate that they find a wide market. Moreover, they appear not only among the idle and vicious boys in great cities, but also among schoolboys whose parents are careful about the influences brought to bear on their children. No student of social phenomena can pass with neglect facts of this kind—so practical and so important in their possible effects on society.

    Interesting reading how puritanical many of the classical liberals were. Why did libertarians go in the opposite direction?

    And interesting reading and seeing Sumner (along with Herbert Spencer) realizing that industrial, commercial and urban societies that they supported completely failed to “civilize” the population as they expected them to do.

    • Pat

      Interesting reading how puritanical many of the classical liberals were. Why did libertarians go in the opposite direction?

      Rothbard and Rockwell carried on in that tradition, eventually leading to the coining of the term “paleolibertarian,” but the broader libertarian movement, if there is such a thing, embraced the ’60s counter-culture and made libertinism and egalitarianism of primary importance.

      • R C Dean

        “the broader libertarian movement, if there is such a thing, embraced the ’60s counter-culture”

        I hadn’t realized the roots of cosmotarianism ran that deep.

        Libertarians: trying (and failing) to be the cool kids since 1967.

      • creech

        Rothbard was always chasing the (few) Libertarian ladies when Joey wasn’t around.

      • Winston

        Cite? I wouldn’t be surprised if true though.

        Also Rothbard was aligned with the Counterculture until he realized they were Commies who weren’t listening to him. And Mises.org still complains about the cops and the drug war.

      • Winston

        His writing about the 1960s campus radicals aged like fine wine:

        https://mises.org/library/never-dull-moment/html/c/507

        But the students do know, and clearly, what it is they are against; they are against the present system, and specifically against the state-ridden educational bureaucracy endemic in the world today. They are, as it were, instinctive libertarians, lashing out in fury at institutions which they perceive are oppressing and manipulating them. One thing is certain: These kids are not “Communists.”

        It’s true that the idols of the West German and the French youth, and the American rebels too, are such Communist leaders as Mao, Che Guevara, and Ho Chi Minh. But they are not revered as Communists; no one, after all, likes very much, let alone worships, such current Communist leaders at Brezhnev, Gomulka, or Gus Hall; the reason is that the above leaders are admired not as Communists, but as successful revolutionaries. In this modern, complex, and militarized world, Ho, Che, and Mao were able to make revolution; it is this achievement, not Communism, that leads the young to idolize them.

        At any rate, I, for one, shall not weep for whatever might be swept away of the old, state-dominated, bureaucratic university structures.

      • Winston

        One thing I noticed is that the classical liberals didn’t realize how much of their support was a fad and they and assumed their victory was complete and permanent. However once it be became a fad to be a socialist around 1890 or so classical liberalism collapsed pretty quickly. The same mistake was made in 1990s. Remember the Libertarian Moment?

      • Zwak , who will swing for the crime, in double time!

        Anyone who thinks their “victory” is complete and permanent is a fool. Hubris clobbered by Nemesis.

      • creech

        Told to me by two he propositioned.

      • Winston

        If libertarians were relevant this might be an excuse to cancel him. );

    • Pat

      Reefer madness?

    • slumbrew

      The Canadian government isn’t libertarian even if they perform a single act that is in line with increasing personal liberty? That seems to cover it.

    • R C Dean

      The government doesn’t care if you’re stoned, but doesn’t think the little people deserve to live a comfortable life?

    • rhywun

      Legalizing pot was never about “libertarianism”.

      It was about too many of a certain kind of person getting in trouble for smoking it in public.

      • Ownbestenemy

        What would that certain kind be good sir?

      • slumbrew

        Liberal Party voters.

      • rhywun

        Jazz aficionados.

      • slumbrew

        She was living in a single room with three other individuals.
        One of them was male and the other two, well, the other two were females.

        God only knows what they were up to in there .

        And furthermore, Susan, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to learn that all four of them habitually smoked marijuana cigarettes – reefers!

    • juris imprudent

      How do libertarians explain this?

      Ah, took a few posts, but there’s the old Winston.

      • MikeS

        Yup. It’s like he has some weird compulsion.

      • slumbrew

        Theory: Winston and The Bro are the same person.

        The compulsion just gets expressed differently between the two accounts.

      • Pat

        I’ll be honest, even if he’s trolling, I like that he shakes things up a little. Libertarians don’t always have good answers for everything, and even if you have a sacred cow, you should periodically gore it just to make sure it holds up.

      • slumbrew

        It doesn’t bother me and I agree it’s good to have your ideas challenged. But it does come across as monomaniacal.

  14. hayeksplosives

    Happy Friday indeed !

    Have a social engagement so no zoom.
    See you tamale.

    • Ownbestenemy

      “Social engagement” is a polite way to lay down a subtle brag

      • rhywun

        Hayek is not that coy. If she was gettin’ some we’d probably be hearing about it.

      • slumbrew

        Indeed, see the overnight links. Rolling home at 03:30 like a boss.

      • Ownbestenemy

        Ya she does.

      • Mojeaux

        Yeah, she’s getting laid.

      • hayeksplosives

        True, true. 👍😘

    • UnCivilServant

      “I told you so” isn’t very satisfying in these circumstances.

    • Winston

      Big Tech, Mexicans and Urbanization have sure worked out well haven’t they?

    • rhywun

      Wow. What madness.

    • MikeS

      What surprises me the most about shit like this is how fast it’s coming. This would have been absolutely unthinkable only what…five years ago? Three?

      • Winston

        I mean the whole point of the slippery slope analogy is that things will pick up quickly. I mean remember covid?

      • MikeS

        Go fuck yourself, Winston.

      • Winston

        ?

        I Wasn’t trying to insult you. I mean it is very hard to predict what will happen and we don’t want to admit that our country is rapidly turning to shit. I’ve been pessimistic myself but I sure as hell didn’t predict Covid.

      • MikeS

        Apologies. Misread snark in your comment.

      • MikeS

        And no, the point is that one action will start a chain of unwanted events. Speed is secondarily (if at all) part of the argument.

      • Winston

        I suppose you are right. I guess I was more thinking along the lines that once a decaying system starts to collapse it will collapse quickly and utterly.

      • Zwak , who will swing for the crime, in double time!

        It’s a purity spiral. As one persons says “I am pure” the next person has to say, “no, I am MORE pure” followed by the third person, ad infinitum.

        And it is just going to get worse until the system breaks.

  15. R C Dean

    I dipped my toe in a Twitter thread(?) about the Trump indictments.

    J. F. C. We aren’t just doomed as a society, we deserve to be doomed.

    • Sean

      “We” is a pretty wide brush…

      • R C Dean

        Well, when a society fails, it fails everyone, and takes everyone down with it. Perhaps better phrased as “our society is doomed” etc.

      • rhywun

        It takes a village to swirl down the drain together.

      • R.J.

        Bravo.

      • juris imprudent

        We hereabouts are rare company.

      • Ownbestenemy

        Extremely rare. Maybe even rarer than women with shenisis and men with truly a gash

    • Pat

      I try to convince myself that Twitter can’t possibly be representative of the general public. I truly don’t think it is, I’m just not sure the general public is actually any better; just different.

      • Scruffyy Nerfherder

        Twitter is primarily composed of people who think their opinions are important.

      • Tundra

        They’re not.

        We are freaks. The actual 1%

      • slumbrew

        Are there really 3.5 million of us?

        We’re less than the 1%, I fear.

    • Scruffyy Nerfherder

      Well that was inadvisable.

  16. DenverJ

    Whatz up party people!?!?!

    • rhywun

      Greetings, fellow chat room participant.

      • Ownbestenemy

        Is there meeting I wasn’t aware of? Dammit where is my tiki torch!

    • MikeS

      My BAC

  17. R C Dean

    “Do I need it?”

    No, no you don’t. I expect the 4K will make the early-gen computer graphics even more apparent.

    • Pat

      Unless you’ve got an IMAX sized screen in your house and 20/20 or better vision, the difference from 1080p would be fairly negligible. The analog film it was printed on that played in theaters in 1993 has a higher theoretical resolution by unit conversion. 4k is e-masturbation.

      • Ownbestenemy

        Shhhh you’re giving away the cow for the milk

  18. Mojeaux

    TFW you are really really really glad you didn’t spout off when you felt like it.

    Keeping my mouth shut and my tone measured has saved my ass more times in my life than I can remember. Bravado and “shoulda said” are all well and good until they bite you in the ass.

    • UnCivilServant

      I get that benefit almost as a passive ability because it takes me so long to formulate my words.

      It also means I’m terrible at live debate.

    • rhywun

      Keeping my mouth shut

      That’s something I live by. Also, keeping it brief.

    • Mojeaux

      Fought tooth and nail to keep XY off Insta and TikTok, and he could get around us faster than a ghost of gnats.

    • Sensei

      oof

    • Pat

      Tragic.

      But since we’re all libertarian assholes here… get ready for the but…

      Nothing on the modern web is all that much different from when I was a tween and teen. Yes, the technology is more ubiquitous, but it’s also more centralized, sanitized and curated. We got broadband in my household (128k DSL, upgraded to 256k a year later when it became available) when I was 11 years old. I was pretty much terminally online by 12 or 13. We had no parental controls on our network. My dad gave me exactly one warning in my entire life about computer viruses – he got substantially more of them than the handful that I did over the years. I certainly saw things on the internet that my parents wouldn’t have been happy about, but I never got groomed or raped. Never sent anybody nude or compromising photos of myself. Never got cyberstalked or kidnapped. Goatse, lemonparty, 2 girls 1 cup, /b/ and mislabeled gore and porn videos on Limewire was about the worst of it. So what was my secret? There were groomers, perverts, cyberstalkers, pedophiles, and malicious actors all over the internet during my formative years. If anything they were more out in the open back then because there was less law enforcement engagement on the internet generally, and people still had the pre-9/11 illusion of anonymity and privacy online. Maybe I was just lucky. Or maybe I was taught some moral, ethical and practical lessons offline that translated to my online activities. Instead of focusing on keeping your kids offline or becoming a digital helicopter parent, teach them some fucking values and give them some practical life advice. Networking protocols and the shitty web platforms that use them are inanimate pieces of hardware and software no different from the IBM mainframes in dusty bank buildings in the 1960s. They’re not responsible for your kids doing incredibly stupid shit and getting themselves into massive trouble. That’s on your kids, which ultimately comes back to you. Give them the benefit of this life changing advice. Take them to church, or sports, or clubs or something in the real fucking world from time to time. When I was 3 years old I knew enough not to talk to strangers at the park. That concept can be pretty easily adapted to the digital realm, too.

      • Ownbestenemy

        Maybe I was just lucky. Or maybe I was taught some moral, ethical and practical lessons offline that translated to my online activities. Instead of focusing on keeping your kids offline or becoming a digital helicopter parent, teach them some fucking values and give them some practical life advice.

        just this

    • MikeS

      Much like the women Hunter hires at night, our hands are tied.

      *sensible chuckle*

  19. Winston

    https://praxeology.net/HS-FC-25.htm

    And then football, in my boyhood occupying no public attention, has now provision made for it in every locality, and its leading contests between paid players, draw their tens of thousands of spectators – nay even, as at Sydenham lately, a hundred thousand spectators – whose natures are such that police are often required for the protection of umpires. It may, indeed, be remarked that this game, which has now become the most popular, is also the most brutalizing; for the merciless struggles among the players, and the intensity of their antagonisms, prove, even without the frequent inflictions of injuries and occasional deaths, that the game approaches as nearly to a fight as lack of weapons allows.

    ….

    Meanwhile, to satisfy the demand journalism has been developing, so that besides sundry daily and weekly papers devoted wholly to sports, the ordinary daily and weekly papers give reports of “events” in all localities, and not unfrequently a daily paper has a whole page occupied with them. A grave concomitant is to be noted. While bodily superiority is coming to the front, mental superiority is retreating into the background.

    Herbert Spencer thought that soccer was barbaric, along with cricket and rowing. Also he thought the sports section in your local paper was barbaric.

    • MikeS

      I’m pretty certain he never read the sports section in my local paper.

      • Ted S.

        I bet he didn’t squat or read Glibfit either.

      • MikeS

        Literally a monster.

    • Pat

      Geek who got picked on by the jocks hates the jocks, film at 11.