Saturday Morning Choose My Adventure Links

by | Sep 21, 2024 | Daily Links | 155 comments

I have a bad student and I’m not sure what to do. When I say “bad,” I mean “absolutely unprepared and incapable.” In the course I’m teaching, quantum mechanics, it is expected that you are coming in with proficiency in basic calculus, and things like trigonometry and algebra are absolutely second nature. It’s a highly mathematical subject, there’s no way around that.

Unfortunately, this kid, who is a senior, hasn’t got a clue. 8th grade algebra is a challenge, trigonometry is an enigma, and calculus is a distant dream. Nonetheless, he persisted. And of course is getting none of the material. I’ve had talk after talk with him, and he persists in his delusions of adequacy. To try to put a point to it, I had him up to the board to do a simple calculation (for geeks, it was “normalize the wavefunctions for the particle in a 1-D box model”) which should take an average student about 5 minutes. He was there for the whole class period, flailing away, drawing random brackets around the equations I put up, mumbling about the math courses he’s passed, and whining about the advanced math I’m making them do. At the end, he was no farther than when he started.

This did not give him the message.

I gave an exam. He scored 5/100, and even that was an act of mercy. More talking to him. More hitting a blank wall. My wonder at this point was, maybe I’m just a shitty teacher? So I talked to the other profs. “Yeah, he’s… not very well equipped, mentally.”
“You mean he’s stupid?”
“Mmm, possibly, but more like intellectually lazy, never bothered learning the basics, just skated through. Nobody can get him to understand the material.”
“So how did he get past all the courses up to now? And how did he end up in quantum mechanics?”
“Well, he needs that class and thermodynamics (OMWC: which I teach next semester) to graduate. We told him that he wasn’t ready for those classes but he just sort of bulldozed his way into registering for them since they were graduation requirements.”
“But he’s now in his 4th year. And everyone seems to know that he hasn’t got even an elementary proficiency in math, physics, chemistry, and engineering.”
Uncomfortable looks passed between the profs, Progs to the man. “Well… he’s a (checkbox) so we can’t really fail him.” Followed by stories of plum internships and awards he’s won, passing over some actual smart and hard-working kids.

And this is all OK.

So since I can’t convince him to drop the course (“I need this to graduate this year”), I need to choose: fail the kid and start a massive uproar about discrimination and delay his departure by a year, quietly pass him and make him someone else’s problem, or a creative option I haven’t thought of yet.

Other things that are all OK are birthdays, which today include a guy who spawned generations of talented substance abusers; the poor man’s Jules Verne; the poor man’s Richard Wagner; a guy who taught generations of kids that violence is hilarious; a guy who kept his emotions bottled up; a terrible voice which somehow was perfect; a terrible voice which somehow was even more terrible; the poor man’s Carl Kasell; the best part of Candid Camera; the guy who left more than one baggie of coke in the White House; a guy who has written perhaps two good books and one good movie but unfortunately has written dozens of books and movies; one of the very few near-guarantees that a movie will be good; a guy who wasn’t as good as Trump in picking his enemies; another near-guarantee that a movie will be great; a radio guy whom you can always count on to yell idiotic things as his signature; an actress who in real life will never be First Lady; and one of the numerous Obama retreads still pulling the strings- badly.

We can choose Links, if we like.

This is reminding me of the STEVE SMITH origin story (for those of you who were around HnR in those days).

“There is a diplomatic path.” Which is French for, “Surrender, you Jews are inconvenient.”

Every hotel I stay at seems to be owned by a Patel. This closes the circle.

Interestingly, he spoke last night at the Israeli American Committee conference to wild applause. Don’t those dumb Jews know he’s antisemitic?

When someone in power is this blatantly contemptuous of the constitution, I really have no problem with the gibbet.

One more where I hate everybody involved.

He is shocked, SHOCKED. No-one else is.

This is why I am anti-capital punishment. Maybe he’s guilty, and he’s certainly not a good person. But zero forensic evidence? And they killed him?

When your band covers shit like this, you are far better than the Old Man ever dreamed of being.

About The Author

Old Man With Candy

Old Man With Candy

Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me. Wait, wrong book, I'll find something else.

155 Comments

  1. Pat

    So since I can’t convince him to drop the course (“I need this to graduate this year”), I need to choose: fail the kid and start a massive uproar about discrimination and delay his departure by a year, quietly pass him and make him someone else’s problem, or a creative option I haven’t thought of yet.

    What profession is he going to enter? If he’s going to be in a role where his incompetence has a chance of causing actual harm, fail him. Otherwise, also fail him… but you know, that’s up to you.

    • Sean

      Forward his resume to Boeing.

      • Suthenboy

        This.

    • Grumbletarian

      Fail the kid.

      • UnCivilServant

        Seconded.

        Force the issue.

    • Pat

      You know, on further contemplation, I come out even more strongly in favor of failing the kid. And Solzhenitsyn explains why in Live Not By Lies:

      When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance, it displays on its banner and proclaims: “I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!” But violence ages swiftly, a few years pass—and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally—Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. And it is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit—and this suffices as our fealty.

      And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a personal nonparticipation in lies! Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold not through me!

      And this is the way to break out of the imaginary encirclement of our inertness, the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies. For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.

      We are not called upon to step out onto the square and shout out the truth, to say out loud what we think—this is scary, we are not ready. But let us at least refuse to say what we do not think!

      We needn’t necessarily martyr ourselves in a one-man revolt. But don’t accede to untruth.

      • Fourscore

        At the end of the day you have to live with yourself.

      • The Last American Hero

        An honest man’s pillow is his piece of mind.

    • creech

      Ask one of your NPR ladies what they would do. Except disguise the kid’s victimhood …say the kid wears a MAGA hat to class or has a “Don’t tread on me” sticker on his backpack. I think you’ll get the right answer to your dilemma.

    • R C Dean

      Discrimination? Is he a POC? A QWERTY?

    • UnCivilServant

      Not failing somebody who didn’t learn the material is a disservice to everybody from the ignorant student to their classmates, to the potential future employers, to the general public, to the university itself. While I have no sympathy for the university, No good comes of passing a lie.

      Document all of the basics he could not do and present them when the inevitable whining comes along. If he’s getting 5% on exams there is no way to interpret that as deserving to be there, let alone passing.

    • Animal

      Yes. Fail him so hard that he bounces.

  2. Pat

    a guy who spawned generations of talented substance abusers

    Happy birthday Timothy Leary?

    • Pat

      a guy who has written perhaps two good books and one good movie but unfortunately has written dozens of books and movies

      Happy birthday Michael Crichton?

      • Yusef drives a Kia

        Steven King?

      • Pat

        That was the correct guess.

      • DrOtto

        Crichton was my guess.

    • Fourscore

      That was my guess as well

  3. Ted S.

    or a creative option I haven’t thought of yet.

    Make the final exam an experiment that will kill whoever performs it. Everybody else recognizes this and refuses to do the experiment, thereby passing the test.

    Also, this claims New York is a one-party consent state for recording, so do secret tapings of the other profs saying they only passed him because demographic check-box.

    • Tonio

      Well, that would end OMWC’s career. Even if legal under NY law, it might violate university policy. No other faculty would want to interact with him. The university would find pretext to fire or rubber-room him. And nothing would change except for that one person.

      It’s the societal implications of this are scary: Imagine being treated by an incompetent (checkbox) MDs who couldn’t cold pass a freshman biology exam, driving over a bridge designed by an incompetent (checkbox) engineer, etc. We know that the societal response will be “institutional racism.” Nobody wants to bell the cat, as it were.

      We are so fucked.

      • Sean

        “Nobody wants to bell the cat”

        that will make it easier for the Haitians to find it.

      • Chipping Pioneer

        No other faculty would want to interact with him.

        You say this as if it’s a bad thing.

      • Ted S.

        It was, of course, not entirely serious.

      • Homple

        The First Commandment of Academia is “Thou Shalt Not Flunk The ___s”.

        So they are never flunked. I’m surprised you are surprised.

      • The Last American Hero

        It will also lead to more racism. Trying to find a doctor? Well the guy who looks like X had to study and bust his ass through med school. The others, well, you’re rolling the dice.

    • Suthenboy

      Mrs. Suthenboy used to push me quite a bit to teach.
      No thanks.

    • Chipping Pioneer

      1. Push these two half-spheres of enriched uranium together.

      • Suthenboy

        Not a fluorine sniff test?

        *I watched a kid in inorganic lab sniff the chlorine gas out of a test tube…deliberately…after being told countless times about lab safety and specifically handling chlorine. I never saw him again. I wonder what ever happened to him.

    • rhywun

      a creative option I haven’t thought of yet

      Quit?

      Seriously… I don’t know how you stand that environment.

      proficiency in basic calculus, and things like trigonometry and algebra are absolutely second nature

      Oof. Had that in high school. Lost most of it. I even have one or two “math for programmers” books. I should crack one of them open. Because I really liked math for a while there.

  4. Pat

    French President Emmanuel Macron accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of pushing the region into war during a conversation this week, , N12 reported on Friday.

    With increasing tensions in the North, Macron called Netanyahu in an attempt to de-escalate the situation.

    “You have a responsibility to prevent escalation. There is a diplomatic path. This is the moment to show leadership and responsibility. Your activity in the north is pushing the region to war,” Macron told Netanyahu.

    As we approach the one year anniversary of the region being at war on account of some wayward youths doing some silly things at some kibbutzim near some disputed boundary or something.

    • Suthenboy

      All of the blah blah blah. Whatever. They should all shut the fuck up. The time for gibberish ended Oct. 7 last year.

    • Grumbletarian

      Escalation will end when Hamas surrenders unconditionally.

      • Suthenboy

        Dead people tend to do that. Hamas, their masters, funders, planners and supporters as well. What is going on there is absolute undiluted evil and should be stamped out, burned to ash and their lands salted.

      • LCDR_Fish

        https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/09/israels-competence-penalty/

        The laws of war do not outlaw victory, actually.
        Evidently there were no fraudulent letters fabricating evidence of Russian influence operations to sign this week, so former Obama-Biden CIA director John Brennan — that notorious jurisprudent of jihad — had time to scold Israel over its ingenious “grim beeper” operation against Hezbollah.

        Is there any bottom point at which our cabal of “nonpartisan” former national-security officials will refrain from further squandering the intelligence community’s reputation in the service of progressive Democrats and their alliance with Islamists?

        Curtis Houck has posted the following exchange between Brennan and NBC’s Craig Melvin:

        Melvin: “[I]s detonating a wireless device — is that an acceptable form of warfare?”

        Brennan: “Well, I don’t, I don’t believe so because there’s no way the Israelis would have known who was going to have these pages at the time, which is why we see that there were some children and others who were killed. It’s basically almost a fire and forget mechanism that the Israelis engaged in here… [Y]ou have to question whether or not this is a strategically wise in terms of what it might do in terms of just further emboldening Hezbollah’s interest in trying to lash back against Israel, including on the international terrorist front[.]”

        This is claptrap. And Brennan knows it — lest we forget his role as President Obama’s drone-whisperer, racking up an impressive number of civilian casualties in wartime strikes against terrorist targets. (The oh-so-humane Obama administration resorted to kill shots when its opposition to law-of-war detention complicated the option of capturing and interrogating terrorists.)

        As Rich Lowry and I discussed on the podcast this week, this is not peacetime. Israel didn’t wake up on Tuesday and say, “Let’s do a number on Hezbollah” — or, as the Hezbollah spin that Brennan echoes would have it, “let’s do some indiscriminate attacks against Lebanese civilians.” (Hezbollah’s narrative is that Israel seeks to destroy Lebanon, which therefore needs Hezbollah as its guardian, a distortion of the reality that Iran, with Hezbollah as its enforcer, holds Lebanon hostage in order to maintain a strategic perch on Israel’s northern border.)

        While Brennan proceeds with his long-standing search for the “moderate elements” of Hezbollah, the rest of us might remember that “the Party of Allah” (Hizb Allah) has been designated as a terrorist organization under U.S. law for three decades (i.e., since the designation process was enacted into law) because of its dedication to Iran’s global jihad and its habit of killing Americans.

        Hezbollah was established in 1982, based in Lebanon to confront American forces massed there as “peacekeepers” after Israel expelled Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organization. According to its manifesto, Hezbollah is

        the vanguard . . . made victorious by Allah in Iran [in 1979]. There the vanguard succeeded to lay down the bases of a Muslim state which plays a central role in the world. We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih [sharia jurist] who fulfills all the necessary conditions: [Ayatollah] Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini.

        I’ve previously recounted Hezbollah’s early years of waging Khomeini’s jihad:

        Hezbollah’s founding quickly resulted in a spate of kidnappings, torture, and bombing. (See this useful timeline from CAMERA.) In April 1983, for example, a Hezbollah car bomb killed 63 people, including eight CIA officials, at the U.S. embassy in Beirut. More infamously, the organization six months later truck-bombed a military barracks in Beirut, murdering 241 United States Marines (and killing 58 French soldiers in a separate attack). These operations, like many other Hezbollah atrocities, were orchestrated by Imad Mugniyah, long the organization’s most ruthless operative. [Mugniyah was killed in a joint U.S.-Israeli intelligence operation in 2008.]

        On December 12, 1983, the U.S. embassy in Kuwait was bombed, killing six and wounding scores of others. The bombers were tied to al-Dawa, a terror organization backed by Iran and leading the Shiite resistance against Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi regime (with which Iran was at war). . . . Among the “Dawa 17” convicted and sentenced to death for the bombing was Imad Mugniyah’s cousin and brother in law, Youssef Badreddin. (Badreddin escaped in the chaos of Saddam’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait.) [He was eventually killed in Syria in 2016, where, for five years, he’d been running Hezbollah’s military operations to prop up Iran’s ally, the monstrous Assad regime.]

        Meanwhile, in 1984, Hezbollah bombed both the U.S. embassy annex in Beirut, killing two, and a restaurant near the U.S. Air Force base in Torrejon, Spain, killing 18 American servicemen. On March 16 of that year, Hezbollah operatives kidnapped William Francis Buckley, the CIA’s station chief in Beirut. He was whisked to Damascus and onto Tehran where he became one of the hostages whose detention led to the Iran/Contra affair. Under Mugniyah’s direction, Buckley was tortured for 15 months, dying of a heart attack under that duress.

        Hezbollah hijackers seized a Kuwait Airlines plane in December 1984, murdering four of the passengers, including two Americans. Six months later, Hezbollah operatives hijacked TWA Flight 847 after it left Greece. The jihadists discovered that one of their hostages was a U.S. Navy diver named Robert Stethem. They beat him severely and then shot him to death before dumping his body onto the tarmac of Beirut airport. In early 1988, Hezbollah kidnapped and ultimately murdered Colonel William Higgins, a U.S. Marine serving in Lebanon.

        When al-Qaeda formed in the 1990s, it struck an alliance with Iran and Hezbollah — the mutual determination to wage jihad against the “big Satan” and the “little Satan” (America and Israel) always leads jihadists to set aside Islam’s internecine Sunni/Shiite belligerence. I’ve recapped this, too:

        Iran had an alliance with al-Qaeda beginning in the early 1990s. It principally included training by Hezbollah . . . and such joint ventures as the 1996 Khobar Towers attack, in which 19 U.S. airmen were killed (and the FBI’s investigation of which was obstructed by the Saudi government). Toward the conclusion of its probe (and thus without time to investigate the matter fully), the 9/11 Commission learned that Iran had provided critical assistance to the suicide hijackers by allowing them to transit through Iran and Lebanon as they moved from obtaining travel documents in Saudi Arabia (Saudi passports and U.S. visas) to training for the attacks in al-Qaeda’s Afghan safe havens.

        Indeed, we now know that Iran’s assistance was overseen by none less than Imad Mugniyah. . . . In October 2000, Mugniyah went to Saudi Arabia to “coordinate activities” (as the 9/11 Commission put it) with the suicide hijackers. (See 9/11 Commission Report at page 240, as well as affidavits of former CIA officers and a 9/11 Commission staffer, here and here). Thereafter, Mugniyah and other senior Hezbollah members accompanied the “muscle hijackers” on flights through Iran and Lebanon.

        By enabling the hijackers to cross through these countries without having their passports stamped — an Iranian or Lebanese stamp being a telltale sign of potential terrorist training — Iran made it much more likely that the jihadists’ applications for Saudi passports and U.S. visas would be approved, as they were.

        Pretty moderate, no?

        The 9/11 Commission urged that the federal government further investigate Iran’s and Hezbollah’s role in the suicide-hijacking attacks in which nearly 3,000 Americans were slaughtered. Alas, U.S. officials have been loath to draw attention to this subject, thanks to their delusional quest for rapprochement with Iran, despite the jihadist regime’s death grip. Not content with willful blindness, the administration in which Brennan was the top intelligence official affirmatively abetted Iran, putting it on a glide path to nuclear weapons and filling its coffers with oil revenue — the billions it has in turn poured into missiles and other material support for Hezbollah and other anti-American, anti-Israeli, anti-Western jihadist groups. The Biden-Harris administration has revived this suicidal policy.

        From its strategic stronghold on Israel’s northern border, Iran’s Hezbollah forces form the spear tip of the jihad unabashedly aimed at Israel’s annihilation. A day after Iran’s comparatively backward Hamas proxies unleashed their October 7 barbarities, Hezbollah commenced sporadic missile attacks on Israel that have continued at varying intensity levels ever since. (Hezbollah’s arsenal is believed to include over 150,000 Iranian-manufactured ballistic missiles.) The result has been the forced evacuation of northern Israeli communities. The government evacuated 60,000 people, and thousands more have had to follow as the skirmishes intensify.

        This has forced Israel to fight an ever-expanding, multifront war. To repeat (see, e.g., here, here, and here), Hezbollah’s operations in the north, complementing Hamas’s attacks (abetted by Egyptian jihadists) in the southwest, have been supplemented by (a) Iran-backed jihadists on Israel’s eastern border (over a dozen jihadist “battalions,” including Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades) in the West Bank; and (b) the Houthis (Ansar Allah), Iran’s proxies in Yemen, who conduct bombing raids from over the horizon. One of the Houthis’ Iranian-made missiles was struck by an Israeli interceptor missile before hitting Tel Aviv just a few days ago. (Israel has denied early reports that this was a hypersonic missile. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has reportedly developed such missiles, which travel at extraordinarily high speed and with maneuverability in flight, making them difficult to track and defend against.)

        The war is constricting Israel’s territory. In the West, we are largely uninformed about the effect this is having. That’s not just because we are not experiencing it ourselves. Israel’s forces and defense measures are so effective that the jihadists arrayed against them have been unable to carry out an attention-grabbing, mass-casualty strike since last October 7.

        In Israel, however, the intensifying war in the north means a second school year has now begun with a significant slice of the population forced out of their communities, schools, and homes. This is increasing the pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government — a fragile coalition that was already under political duress due to the pre-October 7 controversy over a proposed overhaul of Israeli courts and the stunning intelligence failures in the lead-up to Hamas’s attack, in which nearly 1,200 were killed, 251 were taken hostage, and hundreds more maimed, raped, and wounded.

        In the transnational-progressive echo chamber, Israel suffers from a competence penalty: As a tiny island in a sea of hostiles, it has become adept at homeland defense. Consequently, it is hamstrung by the Left’s distortion of proportionality. This principle of warfare is actually not a bean-counting exercise in which Israel’s combat operations must be constrained by how many Israelis its enemies succeed in killing.

        In war, the objective is to break the enemy force’s will so that the fighting ends. That — victory — is the surest way to minimize casualties. It is far preferable, in this grim calculation, to the “international community’s” appetite for cease-fires that enable terrorists and their state sponsors to regroup for future murder, mayhem, and repression of civilian populations, rather than being defeated conclusively.

        The laws of war do not outlaw victory. It is not expected that an honorable military force will cause no civilian casualties. Notice that in the Obama years, Brennan defended himself by stressing — quite correctly — that U.S. precision drone strikes assassinated terrorists while minimizing collateral damage. He didn’t claim to have eliminated civilian deaths and damage to civilian infrastructure. The only way to do that, when confronted by an enemy that flouts the laws of war by embedding in civilian areas, is to surrender. Instead, honorable combatants are expected to make reasonable efforts — not the herculean efforts Israel customarily makes, but reasonable efforts — to limit civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure while nevertheless killing and capturing enemy fighters and demolishing enemy assets.

        Proportionality is a matter of trying to ensure, within reasonable military judgment, that the degree of force used is commensurate with the military significance of the target, recognizing that there will inevitably be collateral damage — even a great deal of damage if the target is sufficiently valuable.

        Needless to say, Hezbollah has no interest in the Western conception of civilized warfare . . . except insofar as it can be used against Israel and the West.

        In just the last two months of its war of aggression, Hezbollah killed twelve Israeli Druze children in a missile strike that hit a soccer field. Israel responded with a targeted air strike that killed Hezbollah’s senior commander in Lebanon, Fuad Shukr — only to be lectured about “escalation” by the Biden-Harris administration, notwithstanding Shukr’s leading role in the afore-described 1983 attack in which 241 U.S. Marines were killed. As ever, Hezbollah proceeded to launch regular barrages of rockets at northern Israel, leading up to August 25’s attempt to fire in excess of 2,000 missiles simultaneously, a major attack thwarted at the last minute by Israel’s preemptive strike (in which about 100 IDF warplanes took out nearly 300 of Hezbollah’s missile launchers, among other targets in Lebanon). With that gambit having failed, Hezbollah tried again less than two weeks ago, with a more modest barrage of over 200 rockets and drones; but on alert, Israel managed another preemptive aerial blitz that rendered the attack a failure.

        Following the smashing success of the grim-beeper operation, Hezbollah launched another 120 rockets on Friday. As usual, the barrage had little effect, except in underscoring that the constant missile fire has left northern Israel scarcely inhabited. Netanyahu, however, had better steel himself for another “escalation” lecture by the Biden-Harris administration because the IDF followed this enemy attack by killing Ibrahim Aqil, yet another Hezbollah commander, who was complicit in both the Marine barracks and U.S. Embassy bombings in 1983, along with about 20 other jihadists in what they mistakenly thought were their Beirut safe houses.

        This is the daily reality for Israel. From every side it faces jihadists who are trying to kill its citizens. But under the competence penalty, we’re supposed to consciously avoid the annihilationist intentions of these enemies — who are also committed enemies of the United States — and hand-wring about collateral damage from pagers exploding on terrorist hips.

        Of course there was no way Israel would know exactly where those hundreds of pagers were going to be positioned when they were detonated. But because it knew Hezbollah assigned pagers to its operatives, Israel, in its defense, devised a scheme that maximized discrimination — unlike the jihadist aggressors, who murder indiscriminately. The operation had a very high chance of taking out Hezbollah fighters without causing too many civilian casualties. It was proportionate. As a matter of practice, moreover, the IDF has gone to historically unprecedented lengths to avoid civilian casualties, at the expense of the safety of its own troops, and with the knowledge that these measures allow some number of jihadists to evade capture — jihadists who will use this new lease on life to plot and execute future attacks against Israeli civilians and troops.

        Even given the low expectations that attach from John Brennan’s years in the Obama-Biden national-security orbit, it’s astounding to hear him fret that Israel’s brilliant surgical attack on Hezbollah jihadists may not have been “strategically wise” because it ran the risk of “further emboldening Hezbollah’s interest in trying to lash back against Israel.” What part of “Death to America and Death to Israel” does our nation’s former top intelligence official not get?

        See also https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/hezbollah-history-lesson/ and https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/hezbollah-has-fired-8000-rockets-at-israel-since-october-7/

      • LCDR_Fish

        Guess I had 1 too many links in my last post – awaiting moderation. BTW…for quotes…what is the method for keeping line breaks/paragraph breaks in place?

    • Homple

      “As we approach the one year anniversary of the region being at war on account of some wayward youths doing some silly things at some kibbutzim near some disputed boundary or something.”

      One year? It’s been about 80 years.

  5. Fourscore

    OMWC, if your student can read this, he’s lucky. My tenure as a Student Teacher reminded me too much of my own public (government) school experiences. I never had any class…

    I guess he may have been a high school football player, NTTAWWT but so was Gerald Ford

    • Old Man With Candy

      So was John Urschel and I’d give a few vital organs to have someone like him in my class.

  6. Suthenboy

    Against the death penalty…bingo. I am not against it. I just cant think of anyone qualified to dispense it, the state being first on that list.

    The more that the power to speak is disseminated to the population of humans the more some of them attack it. While seeing it in the rest of the world is not surprising to me this horseshit has to come to an end in the US.

    • Cunctator

      —“I just cant think of anyone qualified to dispense it, the state being first on that list.”—

      Philosophically, I have no objection to the death penalty. Practically, I am opposed to it until there is some way to be SURE. I arrived at this position as a result of the Timothy McVeigh case. I do not doubt that he was guilty and deserved the death penalty. But at the last minute, boxes of evidence that should have been turned over to the defense were found (within days of scheduled execution) to have been withheld. None of the evidence was in any way exculpatory, but that is not the point.

      It got me thinking. With the hundreds of agents and lawyers involved, they couldn’t get it right. What chance does some Schmo have in that situation? The average defendant can get steamrollered and without access to the many lawyers McVeigh had, they would be screwed.

      • Pat

        McVeigh’s express lane from conviction to execution did a lot to feed the conspiracy theories surrounding the bombing. It was almost as if the whole thing was a foregone conclusion from the moment he got pulled over in the Mercury Marquis.

      • Ted S.

        As I like to joke, even Marisa Tomei knows they have to hand over that evidence to defense counsel.

      • Grumbletarian

        Philosophically, I have no objection to the death penalty. Practically, I am opposed to it until there is some way to be SURE.

        My idea: If a prosecutor wants to have the death penalty considered at sentencing, he says so during discovery. This raises the burden of proof the jury must consider when reaching a verdict. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is no longer sufficient. You need something like irrefutable proof. A video of the crime happening clearly showing the defendant. Undeniable DNA evidence. Something like that.

        The tradeoff for seeking the death penalty is that, should the jury fail to convict, then the defendant is acquitted. No bargaining for lesser charges during the trial or lowering the burden of proof once the trial begins.

        I would think prosecutors will only seek the death penalty rarely, which would at least increase the chances of only the guilty being ended.

      • Suthenboy

        The trouble with being sure is that those cases allow the not so sure cases to continue. Politics plays into it too much. It should be done away with entirely.
        If I surprise some blood soaked fiend in the midst of dead babies while it is taking a bite out of a half eaten one I am probably going to shoot him. I suppose that makes me a hypocrite. Oh well.

      • Grumbletarian

        It should be done away with entirely.

        Then what do you do with all the Lifers Without Parole? Stick them in genpop with people you hope to rehabilitate? GLWT. You get a bunch of people who know they’re never going to leave prison fucking up the chances of people who actually might want to return to society.

        My father was a corrections officer for a bit over 20 years. The inmates who weren’t ever leaving prison had all the time in the world to file frivolous lawsuits, attack guards with anything not nailed down, provoke fights with (or just flat out murder) other inmates — the outcomes of which only negatively affected the people with finite sentences — after all, you can’t stay in prison longer than forever. What incentive is there for lifers to not be fuckheads?

      • juris imprudent

        Then what do you do with all the Lifers Without Parole?

        They get their own special prison. The STUPIDEST thing we have ever done in this country in terms of correctional institutions is the one-size-fits-all genpop you mention. First-timers should all be in first-timer-only prison. Same with second-timers. But that’s your last shot at rehabilitation – your next stop is one that says you refuse to learn.

      • Cunctator

        —“It should be done away with entirely.”—

        If I may make a proposal: Moratorium (say 10 years) on enforcing the death penalty, no to be confused with not sentencing anybody to death. If, during that moratorium, one person is falsely convicted for any crime, the clock starts over. With such power in their hands, the courts have to prove they can handle the power responsibly.

      • robodruid

        I feel like i can comment on this.
        FTR wife has been arrested and charged with two felonies by the indian nation court system.
        It took 3 months to schedule a hearing on dismissing these charges.

        The lead prosecutor wrote a brief of three pages. In it he got lots of stuff wrong, almost deliberately so. IF he had looked at the police video he would have to have known this. He could not recall how many misdemeanors were charged against her. He simelatously said that discovery was complete, but expected more circumstantial evidence.

        They want to have a trial for her in November of this year. They have 2 weeks of court time, 4 weeks of work even before my wife’s case. My wife cannot understand how the prosecutor can lie to the judge so easily.

        I think i am against the death penalty because the prosecutors have to much power but no responsibility.

      • juris imprudent

        prosecutors have to much power but no responsibility

        Prosecutors should always be liable for the same punishment they are seeking on the accused. That would end the death penalty right there.

    • R C Dean

      I am not opposed to the death penalty in principle. If you don’t trust the legal system to get it right, so you’re opposed to it on those grounds, then do you trust the state to administer any criminal penalty? The decades somebody spends locked in prison are just as unrecoverable as the death penalty. Locking someone up for life-no-parole is just the death penalty in slow motion.

      There’s no good options when it comes to dealing with criminals. The death penalty is on my list of good-enough options. The legal system administering it seems to be the real problem. That will never be perfect, either, of course, so the question becomes – is it good enough?

      • Cunctator

        —” The legal system administering it seems to be the real problem. That will never be perfect, either, of course, so the question becomes – is it good enough?”—

        A conundrum. To me, there is a difference between putting somebody in prison or executing them. There are many instances that somebody needs to be removed from society (temporarily or permanently). I understand that some may be falsely imprisoned and will never get the time back, but as usual in our society, they can be compensated. Not a perfect solution I admit. If an innocent person is executed, that is final and there is no way to compensate for that.

        But with all of that said, I believe that there are individuals who have torn up their membership card in humanity and need to be dealt with. People who are obviously guilty of heinous crimes and even confess to them. I just don’t trust the current system to accurately sort these people out.

  7. Pat

    His remark has been hit by backlash, with Dov Waxman, Gilbert Foundation Professor of Israel Studies at UCLA, arguing he is inciting political violence toward Jews.

    Because nobody ever noticed that American Jews break 70+% for Democrats before.

    • Suthenboy

      There is an article somewhere linked recently entitled ‘Why smart people believe stupid things’.

      • Fourscore

        C’mon, man…Gimme a break…

      • Suthenboy

        In a nutshell: Being smart their reasoning and articulation skills allow them to convince themselves that what they want to believe is true is indeed true. It is nearly impossible to talk that person back to reason.

      • Fourscore

        Dunning-Krueger

      • Pat

        In a nutshell: Being smart their reasoning and articulation skills allow them to convince themselves that what they want to believe is true is indeed true.

        Research supports the idea:

        The so-called bias blind spot arises when people report that thinking biases are more prevalent in others than in themselves. Bias turns out to be relatively easy to recognize in the behaviors of others, but often difficult to detect in one’s own judgments. Most previous research on the bias blind spot has focused on bias in the social domain. In 2 studies, we found replicable bias blind spots with respect to many of the classic cognitive biases studied in the heuristics and biases literature (e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). Further, we found that none of these bias blind spots were attenuated by measures of cognitive sophistication such as cognitive ability or thinking dispositions related to bias. If anything, a larger bias blind spot was associated with higher cognitive ability.

      • slumbrew

        I’m about halfway through

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Righteous_Mind

        “Being smart their reasoning and articulation skills allow them to convince themselves that what they want to believe is true is indeed true”

        That’s basically everyone.

      • Suthenboy

        slumbrew: Yes, but with the cognitively impaired the reasoning is very clearly flawed..i.e. obvious idiocy.
        With the cognitively sophisticated they can often nearly convince you.
        I particularly like this sentence: “The so-called bias blind spot arises when people report that thinking biases are more prevalent in others than in themselves.

        Fourscore: Yes, Dunning-Krueger

  8. Suthenboy

    King Crimson video…I have seen that location before. Under the Rocks I think?

  9. Pat

    This is why I am anti-capital punishment. Maybe he’s guilty, and he’s certainly not a good person. But zero forensic evidence? And they killed him?

    I think the death penalty should be used very judiciously, preferably only in cases with overwhelming evidence of guilt. But by the same token, goddamn near every death penalty case in my lifetime has been heralded with splashy headlines proclaiming the innocence of the accused. So either our justice system is even worse than I ever thought, and we nearly exclusively put to death innocent people, or the lawyers for a lot of death row inmates coming up on doomsday do a media gish gallop in a last ditch effort to save their clients’ lives.

    • Old Man With Candy

      What amazes me is that this one ISN’T apparently a contrived lawyer argument. No forensic evidence. None. Conviction based on testimony of an alleged accomplice who was incentivized (and that was hidden from the jury). And the testimony was recanted.

      So of course the State killed him.

      • juris imprudent

        Still not as bad as the case documented in The Thin Blue Line.

      • Pat

        This one does seem particularly egregious.

    • juris imprudent

      Saint George Floyd of the spotless reputation.

    • DrOtto

      We have an ongoing one in TX right now (Rodney Reed) that underscores how craptastic the legal system can be. Without going into specifics, prosecutors who hide evidence should face the same penalties as the accused.

    • rhywun

      Amazingly, they’re making a racial case out of it. 🙄

  10. Fourscore

    “This is why I am anti-capital punishment”

    Capitol punishment could be administered by the ballot box but never seems to be.

    • juris imprudent

      I would put the decision, and execution, in the hands of surviving family. But please god not a popularity contest.

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        Oddly enough, Chuck Pahalinuk had to do that with his fathers murderer.

  11. Chipping Pioneer

    Fail the kid.

    I have observed over the past year, both as faculty and as a student, that academic standards are much lower than they were 30 years ago. This has to change.

    I failed 2 kids who were similarly incapable. Administration was supportive, and there weren’t any consequences to me. YRMV. Also failed a couple for brazenly cheating on the final exam, which got them removed from the program. All told, a quarter of the class.

    • Ted S.

      Did the kids you failed tick the right (wrong) demographic checkboxes?

      • Chipping Pioneer

        They were diverse.

    • Old Man With Candy

      I see the same thing and it’s not just nostalgia. Last semester when I taught statistical mechanics, I was warned that the students’ math was weak. But there was one student that the other profs praised to the skies. “He’s great at it, he’ll be two steps ahead of you, his math skills are superb.”

      And indeed, he was better than the rest, but… in the stat mech course I took as an undergrad, he would have been in about the middle of the pack. And this was at a public college branch campus, not an expensive private liberal arts university.

      In all seriousness, I think the two years we stole from them in a panic about a disease that barely affected that demographic absolutely destroyed their brains.

      • juris imprudent

        The dumbing down was on a long, long trend – the COVID panic just accentuated that.

      • The Last American Hero

        This doesn’t surprise me. I am shocked and appalled at how few books my kids are required to read in school, and that it’s taken for granted that most kids will be listening to the audio book. I have a senior who’s got very high grades and has never had to write a paper longer than 4 pages. The school allows retakes on all tests and your scores are averaged with the original test. Most classes don’t administer a final exam and if they do it doesn’t count for much.

        I had none of this. We were reading 2 books at all times for school, had long papers due on a regular basis, 10 pagers with footnotes etc due 1-2 times a year, missed homework got a zero, no test retakes, and the final was 25% of your grade – equal to a full cardmarking.

        Now, I get the emphasis on learning the material over focusing on busy work or allowing one bad test to slag your grade, but don’t tell me a kid with a 3.8 today is the same as it was when I was in school.

    • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

      Pioneer is right. The damage that passing this kid will do the institution is much higher than the damage that will occur when the protests come. They will pass, as most people have the brains (HA!) to see there is a reason for the failure.

      That said, you need all of your cucks in a row before starting on this path.

      Music is good. I had a girlfriend back in the day who was a dancer, and she did a couple routines to that song.

      • Fourscore

        In addition, all the other students would know. They busted their ass(es) and see the academic class clown getting a similar reward.

    • slumbrew

      Are the exams blind-graded? It’d be hard to argue with you if he fails the exams.

      • Old Man With Candy

        They’re not, but OTOH, the nice thing about courses like this is that there’s no subjectivity- you either calculate the energy correctly or you don’t, your wavefunction is normalized or it isn’t, the electronic distribution matches what happens in the atom or it doesn’t.

      • juris imprudent

        Reality is an oppressive concept isn’t it?

    • Suthenboy

      I look over my father’s transcripts. He got a bachelors of metallurgy from Rolla school of mines in 1965. Looking at those transcripts today he would be called ‘Doctor’ in chemistry, physics or any of the various earth sciences. The difference in standards was very striking to me.

      • slumbrew

        I imagine standards were higher before everyone “had” to go to college.

      • Old Man With Candy

        The difference is, though, not that the courses are harder, but for that doctorate, you have to do original research and defend it. So Masters at best.

        That said, even the original research part has been degraded, not because of the schools but because of the ongoing pernicious influence of the government pretty much taking over academic science via dependence on government grants, professional organizations, and Federal DEI requirements.

      • Suthenboy

        He asked his father for life advice and his father said “YOU ARE GOING TO COLLEGE”.
        It wasn’t the prevailing opinion at that time like now but my grandfather was a different breed. He was born in ’87 on a family farm. When he was 18 he hitchhiked from Catahoula parish to Baton Rouge by himself to attend LSU and became a successful civil engineer.
        Let me put it this way: What today takes 15 minutes by car, Manifest, La to Jonesville, La in 1905 was an exhausting all day trip – before sunup to after sundown.
        Ride a mule for hours from Manifest to Rhinehart. Hitch a ride on the train which went walking speed to Jonesville. The train stopped every time some hayseed stepped out of the bushes and waved it down for a ride. Also keep a few pennies in your pocket for the robbers that inevitably stopped the train near French Fork. “They got you coming’ and going’ as he put it.
        For an 18 yo to make the trip from Manifest to Baton Rouge in those days was quite a feat. He was determined to escape the life of a serf bound to the land and he wasn’t going to see his son return to it.

        My father went to college.

      • Suthenboy

        He did…he perfected some combination of the cyanide/gold concentration with the arsenic/gold extraction process. I guess until about 1980 if yo u wanted to build one of those concentrators you called him.
        Amazing is how quickly ‘world experts’ in obscure things like that become yesterday’s news.

      • juris imprudent

        even the original research part has been degraded

        I’ll disagree in part. Publish or perish has nothing to do with govt funding. The development of trivial academic fields is also a product of multiple factors, govt funding being a very small one.

        Selection for competence was abandoned in education long before DEI was ever dreamed up.

      • Old Man With Candy

        JI, I beg to disagree. A huge part of funding decisions is tied up in publication record and metrics like h-index and other similar constructs. The other end of it is the pet interests of grant officers leavened by the interests of the funding agency to expand government power. If my proposal is to show the massive threat of PFAS and the need for government action, that can get funded; if my proposal is to show that it’s not a significant risk and we need to move on, funding opportunities are zero.

        And as any of us in the grant game know, all outcomes are pre-determined. One of the big lies is that “this agency wants to fund high risk high payoff research.” Only the latter is true.

      • juris imprudent

        OM, no disagreement about the dysfunction that govt funding produces. And fair enough, the warning about this (with science in particular) goes back to Eisenhower.

        Naturally the bureaucracy funds research that serves the bureaucracy. The problem has less to do with the dollars than with the bureaucracy in the first place.

        None of that goes to the two things that outside of science research (and its funding) – first the specious fields and second the [more recent] administrative bloat.

  12. Drake

    I thought it was obvious and accepted that Netanyahu is trying to start a major regional war and pull in the U.S. Iran and Hezbollah aren’t cooperating because the neo-cons are impatient and are trying to start wars with Russia and China. So they’re waiting until we’re committed elsewhere.

    • Drake

      Netanyahu’s other problem is that his ruling coalition breaks up the moment peace breaks out. At that point he’s facing jail time for corruption.

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        Meh, Bibi’s always under a cloud of indictment. The Israeli left hates him as much as the American left hates Trump.

      • Ted S.

        Yeah, it’s hard to find neutral information about the nature of the corruption charges.

        It’s possible he’s extra-corrupt by political standards; after all, one of the previous PMs (Olmert, IIRC) was found guilty on corruption charges. But all the coverage comes across as about as informative as coverage of Trump.

    • Ted S.

      You really need to read some less unhinged opinions.

      Why would Hezbollah be the one and only of the Iranian proxies not stepping up actions against Israel? It’s really irritated me the last several months how many people have taken the opinion of “fuck international shipping lanes so I can get a Pyrrhic victory over the Western foreign policy establishment”.

    • rhywun

      I was under the impression that Hezbollah was already at war with Israel. You know, lobbing rockets across the border?

    • R C Dean

      Hasn’t the regional war of Israel v Iran/proxies been going on for quite awhile now? I don’t see how Netanyahu is starting anything.

      • Old Man With Candy

        He’s just a fashionable boogieman.

  13. rhywun

    Just saw a Kamala ad informing me that Donald wants to put women back in chains.

    She really is a piece of work.

    • Chipping Pioneer

      I would settle for back in the kitchen.

    • Pat

      Not for nothing, but when were women placed in chains, and when were the chains removed? Biden may be senile, but at least when he delivered the same line it was vaguely related to the institution of chattel slavery.

      • rhywun

        Oh she used different words but it boils down to the same thing.

    • Drake

      Can we get more details on that plan? I’m intrigued.

    • Grumbletarian

      As long as the women all get gold bikinis with the chains.

      • DrOtto

        On the surface, I like this, but as I look outside, there are a lot of women I don’t want to see in gold bikinis.

      • The Last American Hero

        Adam Corolla had a bit he used to do saying that if this country really wants to solve its weight problem, we need swimsuit Fridays instead of casual Fridays. Every other week, you had to come to work in a swimsuit. No exceptions.

        You’d have the obesity epidemic licked in about a year.

    • Urthona

      Wow.

      I don’t remember reading about those times.

    • The Last American Hero

      Fuck that. I’m still waiting for my handmaid from the first Trump administration.

  14. rhywun

    a terrible voice which somehow was perfect

    I had “Tom Waits” but yours works too.

  15. rhywun

    Every hotel I stay at seems to be owned by a Patel

    Heh. I stayed at a Best Western in NYC a few weeks ago that was literally the worst hotel experience I have ever had.

    The Indians running the place were super nice but one of them really needed to stop showering in Axe every day.

    • The Artist Formerly Known as Lackadaisical

      “‘to stop showering in Axe every day.”

      You don’t want to know what he smelled like without it.

      • Fourscore

        Many years ago I stopped at a motel in Van Horn TX. As soon as I opened the door to the lobby/registration, I knew. The smell of curry can not be disguised, the room, however, was fine.

  16. rhywun

    When someone in power is this blatantly contemptuous of the constitution, I really have no problem with the gibbet.

    Words fail. I *think* he has no shot at the prize he wants, if only because he probably can’t be controlled by the Obama blob.

    But my goodness, he is evil.

    • juris imprudent

      Babylon Bee already called Newsom out and he has no intention of challenging them in court, where he would be crushed. Instead he’ll thrill the pack of zombies that hate on Musk.

  17. Suthenboy

    Ok, it’s been fun but back to the salt mines for me now.

    • The Other Kevin

      Have a great day! We’re dropping my kid off at the airport this morning. It was a really nice visit.

    • R.J.

      Me too. It’s been fun reading the comments today.

  18. The Artist Formerly Known as Lackadaisical

    ” I need to choose: fail the kid and start a massive uproar about discrimination and delay his departure by a year, quietly pass him and make him someone else’s problem, or a creative option I haven’t thought of yet.”

    You have an actual moral duty to fail him is you think he may ever be put in a position to affect someone else. Which he probably will (chemical engineering major?).

  19. LCDR_Fish

    UCS – watching the Bricky/Poorhammer Space Marine 2 stream – it sounds like they recommend controller over keyboard without exception.

  20. The Late P Brooks

    Pioneer is right. The damage that passing this kid will do the institution is much higher than the damage that will occur when the protests come. They will pass, as most people have the brains (HA!) to see there is a reason for the failure.

    This. You should forward that opening exposition, as written, to each member of the Board of Trustees.

    Then… learn to code cook.

    • slumbrew

      At best he’ll be swiftly promoted out of harms way and be a hated, incompetent manager.

      A triumph of diversity!

  21. Raven Nation

    FWIW: in some ways I have less of a problem failing seniors than freshmen. Without going into all the ins and outs, as people have noted above, most freshmen are in so many ways, not just academically, unprepared for college. For a senior, you’ve had four years to figure this out.

    Institutions are also causing their own problems. Where I teach, there’s a lot of scrutiny on the percentage of students who either withdraw or fail their intro Gen Ed classes. But, the scrutiny is on the instructors. If those fail/withdraw rates are too high (nebulous term), then the question is “how do you plan to change your approach to teaching the class” never, “hmm, maybe our incoming students aren’t adequately prepared.”

    I don’t know OWMC’s actual position there but it seems to me he’s the equivalent of an adjunct. At most schools, you don’t even have to fire adjuncts, you just “don’t have any courses for you next semester.”

    • Old Man With Candy

      I’m an assistant professor, “visiting,” which is not tenured but also not adjunct. Contract basis, so if they have no courses, they still have to pay me. My contract is up at the end of this academic year and at that point, I’ll try to go back to my old research position and never deal with classroom teaching again.

      • Raven Nation

        Ahh, ok, my mistake.

  22. LCDR_Fish

    From a few more links yesterday – sounds like no season 2 of My Lady Jane for MLW to critique 🙁 Hilarious to see GRRM complaining about it.

    Been wanting a custom gaming cabinet for decades but never got around to it. A legacy NeoGeo cabinet might still be an interesting option since they had the easily swappable cartridges and even the original cabinets sometimes had 4 or more game slots in the motherboards. I definitely need to get off my ass and get the little mini-sega genesis and mini-neogeo tv consoles to go with my mini-snes classic.

    OMWC – definitely need to flunk the guy. It may be the only time he brushes against reality his entire time at college – could be a real eye-opener in a good way.

    I did AP Calc in HS (got a 3), did Calc 1 my first semester in college. Didn’t need another math class really…but was still planning on an econ degree so I tried Calc 2…that wound up being my only flunked class ever. Disappointingly the first exam was right after the drop/add date (and I was already a little short on total credits for the semester) – I thought I had been doing alright based on the homework, but the exam proved me wrong. Recovered after my freshman year, but definitely hurt my overall GPA – not that it stopped me from a military career – other than the Air Force officer’s application…who GAF about college GPA for an officer application if you’re prior service with a valid security clearance, etc….?

    • rhywun

      I flunked a few classes of my own in college. In retrospect, it was obvious that I was choosing the wrong classes (hell, the wrong major(s)).

      OTOH it was the late 80s and I am not diverse, so… no sweat off their backs.

  23. The Late P Brooks

    No shame

    A fired-up Vice President Kamala Harris adopted a rapid-response mentality to seize on the key issue of abortion rights this week.

    Referring to people behind abortion bans as “these hypocrites,” she argued at a hastily arranged campaign event in Atlanta that some US communities now dealing with abortion bans have for years been neglected on the subject of maternal care. “Where ya been?” she asked.

    The pivot to an intense focus on abortion rights evolved over the course of the week after the nonprofit newsroom ProPublica published a report on two Georgia women who died as a result of delayed medical care linked to the state’s abortion ban.

    By Thursday, the mother of one of the women was in the audience of an event livestreamed from Michigan, telling the story of her daughter’s tragedy to Harris and Oprah Winfrey.

    Climb up on those bodies.

    If we don’t make abortion freely available, people will die!

    • The Artist Formerly Known as Lackadaisical

      “The pivot to an intense focus on abortion rights evolved over the course of the week after the nonprofit newsroom ProPublica published a report on two Georgia women who died as a result of delayed medical care linked to the state’s abortion ban.”

      This is calculated. Later they’ll find the substandard care/deaths had nothing to do with abortion bans. Maybe sometime after the election.

      • juris imprudent

        linked to the state’s abortion ban

        Only so linked by the mentally challenged. It was malpractice, and anymore you have to wonder if some proggie doctor isn’t willing to let a patient or two die just to make a point.

      • The Last American Hero

        The malpractice was making the abortion drugs readily available without mentioning that the side effects may include a fetus rotting inside your body and going septic.

        Safe and effective, amirte?

    • rhywun

      The pivot to an intense focus on abortion rights…

      …was entirely predictable because the Dems have nothing else to talk about.

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        No, but abortion is a BIG thing to talk about.

        That alone could buy them the election.

      • rhywun

        If the Dems win every election going forward because of fucking abortion, we might as well pack it in – the country is over.

      • juris imprudent

        That alone could buy them the election.

        Which tells us something significant about American voters.

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        What, that they want freedom? And that they perceive the R’s as taking it away?

      • juris imprudent

        ZWAK, the Dems are better at painting the Reps as out of step with the electorate in general.

    • Fourscore

      So the failure of birth control education then requires an abortion? Parents/schools and other influencers need to step up their game. It’s like giving out driver’s licenses/cars with no instruction manual.

      Isn’t sex ed starting in first grade? DEI/Trans Ed/LG etc and comes with a Do It Yourself kit? Have I been misled?

      • The Last American Hero

        You could double the size of the pro-life crowd if you included fetal development and abortion videos in sex education classes.

  24. KK, Plump & Unfiltered

    My takeaway is that OMWC is literally the only person on the entire campus that wants the kid to learn and be competent in his field. The rest are all KKK-level racists who think minorities are inferior and need to just be patted on the head like the adorable little animals they think they are.

    • Mojeaux

      Mine too. Pass the kid. Barely. It’s really not your problem to solve and it’s too late for him to learn anything from it and if he is (checkbox), wherever he goes, he’s going to be a DEI hire anyway.

      • creech

        And maybe you can safely traverse campus (or the golf course) without fear there’s a rifle poking out of the bushes in your direction.

    • whiz

      Late to the thread again, but I think a lot of the people passing him before were scared of the DEI repercussions on them, not racist, plus not getting invited to all the good cocktail parties. The former is OMWC’s worry, too — not the parties, he has his own group of people for that.

      Maybe by failing they will decide he shouldn’t be teaching, which is what he wants anyway.

      For the record, I vote for fail, OTOH, I have never had a graduating senior so inadequately prepared. At least where I taught, I would have confidence the admin would back me up.

  25. The Late P Brooks

    Grand finale

    Biden has been receding from the spotlight as the campaign marches on. But he still holds the highest office in the land for another four months and Biden is trying to make the most of it.

    Biden’s chief of staff, Jeffrey Zients, recalled the Sunday morning in July when Biden called to say he was dropping out of the race.

    “He immediately turned to planning for the remainder of the term and he said to me, and I remember it distinctly, ‘I want this next period of months to be as productive or even more productive than any other period of the administration.’” Zients said.

    ——-

    Biden has been working to shore up support for legislation that will be a big part of his legacy: the infrastructure bill, the CHIPs and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act.

    “I’m back again today to begin a series of trips and events showing the progress we’ve made together by our ‘Investing in America’ agenda,” he said.

    He needs to cement his legacy of throwing money at every problem he can invent.

  26. The Late P Brooks

    Unprecedented

    A California firefighter was arrested on suspicion of arson in a series of small fires that burned in wine country in recent weeks, officials said Friday.

    Robert Hernandez, 38, was accused of setting five fires between Aug. 15 and Sept. 14 while off-duty, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire, said in a news release.

    Hernadez, a Cal Fire apparatus engineer, allegedly ignited the blazes around Geyserville, Healdsburg and Windsor, the department said.

    Well blow me down.

    • Ted S.

      I would have guessed a greenie.

    • LCDR_Fish

      Hey…it’s a living.

  27. Grummun

    the poor man’s Jules Verne

    30,000 Leagues Under The Sea was boring.

    one of the very few near-guarantees that a movie will be good

    I really don’t get the adoration for this guy. He’s a good comic actor, not the second coming.

    • Old Man With Candy

      And yet… it’s tough to find a movie he’s in that isn’t on the good to great spectrum. Including his non-comic roles (like Lost In Translation). Caddyshack, Groundhog Day, Stripes, What About Bob, Ed Wood, Mr. Mike’s Mondo Video…

      I’ll grant that Tootsie was awful.

      • juris imprudent

        Scrooged? Razor’s Edge?

      • Gender Traitor

        I’ll grant that Tootsie was awful.

        I maintain that Dustin Hoffman was far more convincing as a woman than Dylan Mulvaney is.

      • whiz

        True, but I think it’s easier to pass as an older, somewhat homely, woman.

  28. Mojeaux

    So, speaking of not prepared for college—that was me, 1986. I was unprepared in a myriad of ways which could have been overcome if I’d asked for help, from whom, and the right questions to ask, but I didn’t even know that much.

    ANYWAY, what I’m bitter about NOW is that I was never taught the order of operations to begin with, and I went to a private school. So. Yeah.

    Maybe I was sick that day.

    • The Last American Hero

      Order of operations was almost an entire semester in Algebra.

  29. Gender Traitor

    the poor man’s Jules Verne; the poor man’s Richard Wagner;

    I can’t help but wonder if the poor man isn’t getting the better end of the deal in both cases.