¿420 para martes por la tarde? Nah. ¡Enlaces mexicanos!

by | Apr 20, 2021 | Daily Links | 332 comments

Yes it is April 20.  I have nothing in particular to say about it…

…other than the house finally passing the marijuana banking bill yesterday.  Something that probably should’ve been done a couple years ago.  Meanwhile, Mexico is still trying to set up their graft structure.

 

AMLO proposes a…tree for migrant program?  It sounds stupid enough for President Harris to sign.

I know little about Ecuador, all jokes about bananas aside.  Apparently its not as corrupt as we might believe.

Brazilian native groups don’t like being poor.

Somebody not named Castro is in charge of Cuba.

Not Mexico related but….you remember that lady they dragged out to bitch out Tipper Gore?  Conformity is totally metal.

 

Here’s a tune.  Have a great 420, man.

 

Edit.  Keep your powder dry, Minnie Soda Glibs

About The Author

mexican sharpshooter

mexican sharpshooter

WARNING: Glibertarians.com contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. https://youtu.be/qiAyX9q4GIQ?t=2m22s

332 Comments

  1. Surly Knott

    Happy 420 dude!

    • Rat on a train

      6 and counting

    • Tonio

      Dude! [coughs]

    • Rat on a train

      Tonight we mostly-peacefully protest at the dispensaries.

  2. Count Potato

    ” Something that probably should’ve been done a couple years ago. ”

    It never should have been necessary in the first place!

  3. Chipwooder

    “What are you people – on dope??”

      • Tonio

        Thank you for that.

    • Shpip

      +1 Learning about Cuba, having some food.

    • Rat on a train

      The good stuff: pseudoephedrine

  4. Count Potato

    “AMLO proposes a…tree for migrant program? It sounds stupid enough for President Harris to sign.”

    Article paywalled. Are they rape trees?

    • mexican sharpshooter

      No, its not paywalled. The CS Monitor link about Ecuador is paywalled but since I never read it I got it for free,

      • Chafed

        That’s how you shitlord.

      • Count Potato

        It is here.

      • Scruffy Nerfherder

        cryptic

      • mexican sharpshooter

        I refuse you enacting my labor. You’ll just have to deal with trees for migrants summary.

  5. Mojeaux

    It’s birthday eve.

    • Rat on a train

      You know who else? Wait, that would have been yesterday.

      • Mojeaux

        Yes, QEII cottoned onto my barfday.

    • Gender Traitor

      Ooh! We’ll drink a toast to you tomorrow! (Non-alcoholic, of course. But not ruling out caffeine.)

    • Bill Door

      Party! I’ll have some green jell-o with shredded carrots in honor of your day! (Did people really eat that? We always joked about it, but I have never been somewhere that it was actually prepared.)

      • Gender Traitor

        One of my sisters still makes it for holiday meals. ?

      • Bill Door

        Does it get eaten or is it the dish everyone politely refuses?

      • Gender Traitor

        I choke down a small helping because I love her. ?

      • leon

        Ahh the old “You will eat it and you will like it” routine.

      • Bill Door

        You’re a good sister. ?

      • Tonio

        I’m from the sixties. The things they did with Jello and Bundt cake molds would terrify today’s kids.

      • Bill Door

        Being raised in Utah, I always heard of these things, but never saw them, perhaps because my dad is a transplant from Texas and wouldn’t stand for that.

      • Stillhunter

        Green jello with carrots is good, but my favorite is green jello with mandarin oranges like my grandma used to make.

      • Mojeaux

        I don’t eat carrots so that’s a hard pass.

      • Count Potato

        Why don’t you like carrots?

      • nw

        Orange vegetable bad.

      • Mojeaux

        I just don’t.

      • db

        My Grandma and my Mom used to make that for picnics all the time. I loved the stuff. Their version also had cabbage sometimes, I think.

      • Tulip

        My family makes the kind with mandarin oranges. Actually two – one is lime Jello plus oranges, and one is mandarin oranges, cottage cheese, cool whip (no substitutes) and a box of orange Jello powder. I eat both.

    • zwak

      Hey, it’s the wife’s b-day eve also!

  6. Not Adahn

    “First he shames us with his terrorist actions on in DC,

    “YES! We are going to take it. We are going to take it as long as our masters feel like dishing it owowowowoowt!”

    • Scruffy Nerfherder

      I guess now we know what he wants to do with his life.

  7. Shpip

    After working in a United States-funded Sembrando Vida program in their country for three years, Central American participants would have the “automatic right” to a visa that would allow them to work in the U.S. for six months per year, López Obrador said.

    And when they overstay their visa after the first six months are up and keep working, and send for their families to join them?

    Oh… feature, not bug.

  8. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Well Dee Snider sure turned out to be a disappointment in his old age.

    • Not Adahn

      To be fair to him, only the first part is disgusting boot-licking. The part where he says “don’t rat on your friends” is actually good.

      • Scruffy Nerfherder

        Meh, seems to me that was an attempt to mitigate his first attack. He probably took some flak for it.

  9. Chafed

    What are the odds Biden signs the Marijuana banking bill? He seems to be an unrepentant drug warrior.

    • Rat on a train

      Well, he opposed the Fair Banking Rule.

    • Tonio

      Give him a pudding cup, or let him cup a little puddin’, and he’ll do anything.

      • pistoffnick

        How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

    • Not Adahn

      He’ll sign anything put in front of him. He’s a less-decent Col. Blake.

  10. Not Adahn

    Keep your powder dry, Minnie Soda Glibs

    I wonder if I can use “I need to get home and fortify the place” as an excuse to leave work early?

    • Tonio

      Needs more rooftop Koreans.

  11. Not Adahn

    The verdict will be read in open court between 3:30 p.m. and 4 p.m. local time.

    Hurry to get the best places in the looting lines!

    • Scruffy Nerfherder

      And they wonder why there’s a plywood shortage.

      • Sean

        $60/sheet for 1/2″

        Fucking ridiculous.

      • Rat on a train

        Loot Home Depot!

      • Scruffy Nerfherder

        After Home Depot came out with their woke shit recently, I think small business owners should start looting them for plywood.

      • Sean

        Lowes is the superior store (locally anyway).

      • Gustave Lytton

        I wish it were that way here. Lowe’s is the amateur store. Actually, they all suck. Just in different ways and degree.

      • Not Adahn

        The guy in charge of the club’s USPSA events is a home builder. His rants have been pretty epic.

    • Sean

      I hope all the brick shipments were made promptly today.

    • grrizzly

      Don’t forget to put on a mask!

    • juris imprudent

      The Bee summarizes the prosecution’s closing argument.

      In Closing Argument, Prosecutor Tearfully Addresses Each Juror By Name, Phone Number, And Street Address

      • juris imprudent

        And the imminent denouement.

        “Yeah, we reached a verdict pretty quickly, but most of our time deliberating was actually spent on LegalZoom getting our affairs in order,” said one nervous juror who was decked out in Kevlar and a fireproof hazmat suit. “We will be reading our wills aloud so there will be witnesses just in case the peaceful protestors murder us all.”

    • mexican sharpshooter

      But I really hate Target. It never has what I want and it smells funny.

  12. Stillhunter

    EvilSheldon on April 20, 2021 at 12:21 pm

    I would say that harassment violates the NAP when it involves force, or actionable threats of force, against me or my property.

    Mere speech doesn’t qualify. I’m unwilling to give moral cover to the idiotic and socially corrosive idea that, “Speech is Violence.”

    And yeah, any response needs to be proportional to the threat, but I think that is probably a different argument.”

    I agree wholeheartedly that speech isn’t violence. I wouldn’t give two shits about someone calling my mom a cocksucker (well is she?). I’m talking specifically about continuing harassment that is essentially unavoidable and affects your health or well-being. Bullies don’t give a shit about principles and some people only respond to force. In these cases I have no problem “breaking” the NAP.

    • Tonio

      [Edit Fairy flits by, checks referenced comment, fixes blockquote formatting, whines about having to work on holiday.]

      • Stillhunter

        Thanks Tonio. Though I didn’t attempt a block quote. I’m a Gen X boomer. Never learned to code.

      • Tonio

        That’s not coding, that’s a lame-ass scripting markup thingy. FORTRAN, now there’s a man’s programming language.

      • Endless Mike

        Yeah well, COBOL is strong enough for a man, but MADE by a woman.

      • UnCivilServant

        Sheesh all you yoots with structured languages.

        Talk to the chips directly and stop wasting system resources.

      • TARDis

        /FOR WTF

        I can’t believe we still use this as a base.

      • The Bearded Hobbit

        FORTRAN IV or GTFO

      • Stillhunter

        It’s all Greek to me.

  13. robc

    I dead posted on the Heinlein subthread, so moving it here:

    There is a spec script on the intertubes for Mistress. It was written by one of the main writers of Buffy. I hated the first third of it, thought it destroyed the story. The last 2/3rds however, were dead on. The first 3rd makes it more of a general rebellion than a libertarian rebellion.

    All in all, better than you could hope for.

    • LCDR_Fish

      Yeah, I’m too late for that discussion too. Big fan of the book, but never seen a good adaptation per se. I do like the CGI animated series for what it was doing at the time, but being kid-friendly hurt it a lot. Nice changes in scenery though.

      I’d heard about the anime adaptation a few years back but I don’t think it’s ever been released stateside. Thankfully we have fan subbers. (I recommend downloading though). Still need to watch 3 eps myself.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIZty-Eol4s&list=PLPYqMN5r-t3iChJW_vEG5dabNhJZ68Hmq

      • LCDR_Fish

        Starship Troopers that is. Wish Critical Drinker had at least referenced the book. Sargon did a better video a couple years ago IMO that compared multiple sources.

    • Tonio

      We can hope for a rewrite of that part. Fan pressure can mean a lot. And I know that paying for a script is a long way from greenlighting, etc.

      • robc

        Wyoming in blackface might be problematic, but at least the main character is a minority.

  14. Chipwooder

    Guessing that the fast verdict is a compromise of guilty on manslaughter and not guilty on murder.

    Riots are happening regardless of the verdict anyway.

    • Scruffy Nerfherder

      I’m not going to bet against you.

      But it might be that the jurors have all received death threats already too.

    • Count Potato

      “White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden wasn’t weighing in on the verdict but expressing concern about the Floyd family”

      Yeah, OK.

      • Not Adahn

        There was something today about Biden’s statments not being the official positions of the adminstration.

      • leon

        I mean, it’s the Biden-Harris Admin, so anything to be an official position has to be signed off by Harris.

      • Count Potato

        It not like he is in charge or anything.

      • Sean

        Pull the other one.

    • juris imprudent

      And risk the mob turning on him?-

    • Rat on a train

      The police acted stupidly.

    • Scruffy Nerfherder

      He should shut the fuck up.

      • Suthenboy

        You forgot to add ‘and go eat his pudding’.

    • leon

      Such a quick return almost assuredly means they have voted to convict him, and probably on all three counts.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        They’re all lesser included, aren’t they? If anything, a short turnaround means they haven’t even been talking about which one fits because they’re acquitting.

        *shrug* we shall see

      • kinnath

        Top charge; then go into hiding before the city burns in celebration.

      • leon

        *shrug*. Yeah i don’t know, i just see the Jury as leaning towards conviction to go in. To get to aquital, you’d have to at least have some more time to beat down the holdouts.

        But i could be wrong. It could also be that the convict holdouts are so week willed that they caved after only 9 hours.

      • Chipwooder

        That’s why I’m guessing they’re going to convict on manslaughter as a compromise

    • Not Adahn

      She was naked, handcuffed, bent over on the stairs with “free use” written on her ass.

    • Not Adahn

      A spokesperson for the school district blamed their ‘insurance carrier and the law firm appointed by the carrier’ for the wording of the court documents

      Fuck. Between school administrators, insurance carriers and lawyers, how am I supposed to know who is the biggest lying ho-bag?

    • Chafed

      It’s boilerplate language for an affirmative defense. It’s also incredibly tone deaf.

    • Suthenboy

      She shouldn’t have dressed like that?

      Sounds like someone needs a whoopin’ and I dont mean that lightly.

    • Sensei

      It’s the school’s insurance carrier that decided to go for contributory negligence.

      Name them. Name the attorneys.

      It’s more fun to attack the school, but they may or may not actually have much say.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        I can’t even imagine what the theory would be there. “She contributed to her own rape by walking down the hallway in the school, a known hangout for rapists”? Contributory negligence makes sense in a car accident, but rape tends to be pretty binary. Either the sex was consensual or it wasn’t.

      • Sensei

        Yup.

        Ridiculous.

  15. Dr. Fronkensteen

    Is it too much to hope that Díaz-Canel turns into another Gorbachev? A true believer that destroys the system trying to reform it.

    • mexican sharpshooter

      I thought about that, and probably.

  16. Count Potato

    “Singer Ted Nugent has revealed he has tested positive for COVID-19, just months after he called the virus a ‘leftist scam’ and ‘not a real pandemic’.

    The 72-year-old musician announced his diagnosis in a Facebook Live video Monday telling fans ‘I got the Chinese sh*t’ and ‘thought I was dying’.

    Nugent has repeatedly dismissed the virus that has so far killed more than 567,000 Americans, branding it a ‘leftist scam’ and ‘not a real pandemic’ while pushing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories online.”

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9491841/Ted-Nugent-tests-positive-COVID-19-previously-calling-virus-leftist-scam.html

    • Tonio

      He got the bat scratch fever?

      • mexican sharpshooter

        It caught him in a Stranglehold.

    • Suthenboy

      He’s not wrong but that doesnt mean the cooties are nothing. Everyone in my family has gotten it except me and I cant swear to that. I had an odd illness a year ago or I may have been a non symptomatic case. I cant say. The tests are worthless.

      576K my ass.

      • rhywun

        I’m not going to try to research it online because I don’t believe anything I read on this matter anymore but I seem to recall that the regular flu kills hundreds of thousands a year too.

      • Suthenboy

        They have been caught fudging the numbers so often that not believing anything you read online or anywhere else is the wise approach. They are liars and liars lie.

      • Count Potato

        Hundreds of thousands would be a record breaking year like 1968 or 1929.

        Nearly half the country go the flu in 1957, but it wasn’t that deadly.

  17. The Late P Brooks

    Ass backwards

    Growing wealth inequality has been exacerbated by the pandemic, as the global middle class shrinks and millions fall into poverty. One question has lingered: What can be done to address both the economic scars of the pandemic, and the inequality that’s grown alongside them?

    For some, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, wealth taxes are one answer, and the idea is more popular than it used to be. Even formerly moderate groups like the International Monetary Fund have called for one-off wealth taxes to help support an economic recovery.

    It’s a measure that could also be popular with voters. A new poll from Hill-HarrisX of 2,813 registered voters asked respondents, “Which comes closest to your view about the wealth tax proposed by Democrats for individuals with a net worth over $50 million?”

    Of those respondents, 56% found wealth inequality to be a “significant problem facing the country,” with billionaires paying a wealth tax part of the solution. Conversely, 44% of respondents considered it unfair to impose an additional tax on people who already pay income taxes because because that would become “a penalty for being rich.”

    We’re going about this all wrong. Let’s just kill all the poor people.

    • R C Dean

      Whatever we do, let’s not look at what might cause people to fall out of the middle class and into poverty.

      • rhywun

        It’s almost like they want more poor people. Nah, that would be crazy.

    • creech

      I know a retired guy who used to do polls for Gallup, for Clinton (in Ark. gov races), for corporations such as pharma, etc. He says there is not a poll taken that could not get a completely different result if the question was just worded differently or a consequence revealed along with the question.

  18. DEG

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, in an early-April interview with Politico, said he would try to advance legislation legalizing marijuana use for adults.

    If Schumer is behind marijuana legalization, I’m certain it will be a shit-show.

    Mexico is inching closer to becoming the world’s largest legal cannabis market as lawmakers prepare to debate a proposal to legalize recreational marijuana.

    Cheech and Chong approve.

    The transition means that the island will be governed by someone other than Fidel or Raúl Castro for the first time since the Cuban revolution in 1959.

    Mr Díaz-Canel is seen as loyal to the Castros and their economic model.

    Meet the new boss…. same as the old boss.

    Nice song.

    • Suthenboy

      *Sigh*

      The top of the totem pole is the lowest ranking entity. The bottom of the totem pole is the highest ranking.
      Another case of cultural misunderstanding.
      Another peat peave – begging the question does not mean a question begging to be asked, it is a logical phallacy wherein the conclusion is assumed to be true in the argument without evidence.

      Fuck Margaret Sanger, fuck planned parenthood, fuck eugenicists and fuck malthusians. They should all go lay their heads on railroad tracks and wait a while.

      • Suthenboy

        ‘Peeve’

        Fucking spell check.

      • grrizzly

        The expression “beg the question” is practically never used correctly in modern American English.

      • The Last American Hero

        Don’t get me started on learning curves.

  19. Stillhunter

    So not just stupid acronyms for legislative bills, but now passing bills on significant dates (including troop withdrawals). *head hits desk*

    • Not Adahn

      Bread and Circuses. Except gluten is evil and circuses are racist.

      • UnCivilServant

        “Circuses” originally meant chariot races.

        Where are the chariot races?

        And not those pansy ‘harness’ races. I want four wild equines doped to hell and back and strapped to a rickety wooden cart!

    • Rat on a train

      Don’t forget bill numbers: HR-51 DC Statehood

    • Tulip

      Apparently the legislature is made up of student government. They think this makes them cool and clever.

    • The Gunslinger

      Nope. Woah mama!

  20. Suthenboy

    What the hell Sharpie? You use a photo of a body painted beauty for the article but no body? Gah!

    Y’all can take it on good authority that Latin tree planters are some of the finest, hardest working people you will ever meet.

    • mexican sharpshooter

      Gah!

      Muwahahahahahaha

    • Tonio

      Family-friendly website, yo.

    • Stillhunter

      Absolutely true. I’ve worked with Mexican, Guatemalan, and Honduran crews. All have been very good. Though we did have one crew that tried stashing trees and even shot a grouse in June (not hunting season and no license). Of course, federal contracts, so they essentially had no repercussions.

  21. grrizzly

    Gov. DeSantis Says CCP Should Be Held Accountable for Abetting Pandemic

    During an interview with The Epoch Times on April 1, DeSantis accused the CCP of promoting its draconian lockdowns to other nations as an essential mitigation measure, leading nations like Italy to destroy their economies. DeSantis also faulted some of the top health officials in the United States, including Anthony Fauci, for blindly adopting the communist regime’s lockdown model.

    “I think the people like Fauci were relying on the Communist Party of China for some of this stuff. You can’t trust what comes out of the Communist Party of China,” DeSantis said. “I think it was a huge mistake to give them any validity in terms of what they were doing.”

    • Not Adahn

      Nice to know that politicians of all parties can be theatrically retarded.

      • Suthenboy

        Fauci has been stomping his feet about it for 40 years.

    • Brochettaward

      Wasn’t the lockdown idea conceived of by the Bush administration?

      • DEG

        Yes

      • grrizzly

        This is true. But the 2020 implementation was much more brutal. In the 2006 article that criticized non-pharmaceutical interventions (at the bottom of the link) didn’t even mention that “non-essential” businesses can be closed. Home quarantine was considered only for sick people or those who had substantial contact with infected people. The idea for staying at home for everyone was not even imagined. Similarly, the argument against school closures was that the kids would still congregate at the malls. How naïve! Yes, the framework for lockdowns and social distancing was laid during the Bush administration. But it was presented in much milder terms. In 2020 everything was dialed up to 11.

  22. UnCivilServant

    Woot.

    3 miles today. Another *ahem* milestone on the way back to 4 miles. A reliable 4 miles opens up additional routes and destinations.

    • Count Potato

      Running? Walking? Unicycle?

      • UnCivilServant

        I’m not carrying a unicycle for miles.

      • Dr. Fronkensteen

        You don’t ruck with a unicycle?

      • Count Potato

        It’s easier than having to carry home a bear.

      • Animal

        Leave me out of this.

    • Dr. Fronkensteen

      congrats. What form of locomotion are you using?

      • Dr. Fronkensteen

        Good, save your knees. It’s an underrated form of exercise.

      • slumbrew

        Not Kylie?

      • Animal

        Grand Funk Railroad did it better.

    • Gender Traitor

      ??

  23. trshmnstr the terrible

    Last day of paternity leave (part 1 of 2… Silly ridiculous company) is today. May not have accomplished everything I wanted to during the time off, but I go back to work a better man with a happier family. Hopefully the momentum carries over. I’m quite thankful for the time with family.

    I’m probably gonna be scarce around here for the indefinite future as I enjoy life and the outdoors and try not to lose this tan. But I’ll make an effort to poke in a couple times per week.

    • leon

      Family is what is important. Not all these Tulpas 😉 Stay Safe!

    • Hank

      “But I’ll make an effort to poke in a couple times per week.”

      …commence bad joke protocol…

      …override joke protocol, commence sympathy protocol…

      Best wishes for yourself and your family!

    • slumbrew

      Your regular presence will be missed – good luck with reentry and best to the fam.

    • DEG

      I go back to work a better man with a happier family.

      This is good.

      I’m probably gonna be scarce around here for the indefinite future as I enjoy life and the outdoors and try not to lose this tan. But I’ll make an effort to poke in a couple times per week.

      Do what you need to.

  24. The Hyperbole

    Prediction – If Chauvin’s convicted it’s because “they” got to the jurors and threatened them and their families. If he’s acquitted it’ll be because “they” want riots so they can double down on dividing the country/racism and gun control. The tin foil hat crowd is covered either way.

    • ruodberht

      I don’t see how either of those helps the tin foil hat crowd that thinks hwhite supremacy is the cause of everything but you do you.

    • leon

      Say what you will about the Tin Foil Hat folks, but they have been eerily on point the last year. 😉 Great Article earlier BTW.

      • The Hyperbole

        I guess I could have dispensed with he snark and just said that I predict no one will opine that the jurors weighed the evidence and came to an honestly deliberated verdict.

        Thanks about the article.

      • The Hyperbole

        Nobody but leon that is.

      • leon

        I like the snark. If that means anything.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        They may have honestly deliberated and decided that their lives were more important than coming to the truly correct verdict in this case. ?

        The fact is that we’ll likely never know. TMITE, politicians, and idiots on both sides have poisoned the well so badly that the water is green and smells of toxic waste.

    • DEG

      If Chauvin’s convicted it’s because “they” got to the jurors and threatened them and their families.

      We do have a handy, dandy guide to the jurors.

      • db

        Seems very responsible to report on things like that. I haven’t been paying attention, but since the trial seems to be covered live on video, are the juror’s faces visible? Or are they wearing masks? It’d be hard to believe that if they were visible, that someone out there hasn’t been doing face recognition on them…

      • leon

        No the jurors were always off screen, as far as i have seen

      • leon

        Following the closing arguments on Monday, April 19, Judge Peter Cahill dismissed two of the jurors as alternates. They were:

        Would you be annoyed or relieved at this? I mean on one hand, you don’t have to play a role in the outcome. On the other hand you just had 3 weeks wasted.

      • LCDR_Fish

        Never would have let that one on who said she “wanted” to be on the jury.

      • Suthenboy

        I don’t get it. I learned how to deal with bullies in middle school. What is wrong with these people?

        Once a girl that was a co-worker of my mother….a young attractive woman…called me to tell me the guy she was dating was bullying her and threatening her. Stalker, control freak kinda dude. I told her to come to my house. I had a guest bedroom with it’s own bathroom etc.
        An hour after she showed up with a suitcase the boyfriend called me and demanded to know if she was there and then threatened me.

        *deep southern drawl* “You know where I am. Come get you some, Cupcake”

        He hung up the phone. He never showed up. Imagine that.

  25. Rat on a train

    What’s the holdup? Is it taking time to get the kangaroos out?

  26. leon

    I won’t make a comment on what i think the Verdict should be, because i didn’t take the time to appraise myself of all the evidence (and why would i, i’m not on the Jury). But i’ll say that from what i’ve seen, both sides put up some good arguments. My gut says that the Prosecution had a very good case to start out with, so hats off to the defense for doing their level best.

    • Rat on a train

      In court isn’t the problem. It is all the stuff outside: politicians telling us what the correct verdict should be, vandalizing the former home of a defense witness, juror intimidation, …

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        Yeah, if its a conviction, there’s a good chance it gets overturned on appeal given all that shit.

        I would say “what a mess”, but I’m convinced that they intended it to be like this. It’s not available to rally the race warriors if it quietly goes to verdict.

    • Brochettaward

      The prosecution lied their asses off on a number of occasions.

      • DrOtto

        So, just like most other trials.

  27. UnCivilServant

    Question for all y’all.

    Ever go in for a prescription refill, see the pills didn’t look like the ones you had before, look up the pills in a reference, find that they’re the same dose of the same medicine from a different manufacturer, but still distrust the new pills?

    • kinnath

      Happens all the time with generics.

      Never worried about it.

    • Mojeaux

      Yes. Generic drugs have slightly different formulas depending on manufacturer. I was subbed another manufacturer for one drug and noticed the difference and raised holy hell with my rx plan.

      Turns out I was right to do that. That subbed rx got pulled off the market.

  28. Drake

    I saw Twisted Sister open for Dio in 1984. After the concert I thought Snyder was a “piece of shit” and “embarrassment to the metal community”. He got into a fight with somebody in the front row (couldn’t tell if it was real or staged) and had another guy kicked out for taking a picture of him.

  29. Lazer

    Guilty. WOW, really thoughtr it would be the third degree and or manslaughter.

    • Rat on a train

      How much do you value your life?

      • Lazer

        Yep. Will be in appeals for a years

    • Ed Wuncler

      And not a damn thing will be done about criminal justice reform. I thought at worst he’ll get manslaughter but he got the book thrown at him.

      • Lazer

        yep. I’ve been so pissed at BLM ever since this bull shit started. They had an actual case with emotional video and cold have pushed for actual reform, but then everything was just “RACIST POLICE !!!!!”

      • Semi-Spartan Dad

        Why would BLM care about police reform? They are a Marxist front.

      • Ed Wuncler

        Activism is a way of life for many of these people, so it’s not surprising that they’ll do whatever they can to never solve the problems that they are protesting against.

      • Hank

        With everything getting on video, many people (eg, me) got their eyes opened to police misconduct – the “other site” under Balko was really educational.

        I am an adherent to the “bad apple” theory – that is, a bad apple ruins the whole barrel (which an internet search confirms to be literally true with real apples).

        So, yes, reforms which fire and – when called for – imprison the bad apples would go far to addressing the problem.

        Of course, it would help to highlight the worst abuses, not the marginal cases – assuming this current movement is about justice.

        Not to mention that it would help to show some cases with white victims, indicating that it’s not just a white versus black issue. Assuming the current movement is about building a broad coalition.

        Though if the “justice” movement were about avoiding real solutions in favor of keeping people mad and voting for radical Democrats – well by coincidence that’s what they seem to be doing.

      • UnCivilServant

        assuming this current movement is about justice.

        I wouldn’t make such an assumption. Not based on their behaviour.

      • Rebel Scum

        If the problem was actually solved then the organizations reason for existing disappears along with those sweat donations. Ergo donations is why the organization exists.

      • Ed Wuncler

        Ding ding ding….we got a winner.

      • Rebel Scum

        *sweet, even.

        Must be because my house is so damned hot right for some reason. *turns up ac*

      • Rebel Scum

        right now**

        I’m not even drinking or anything…

    • kinnath

      what charge?

      • Chipwooder

        all three

      • Lazer

        ALL

    • Drake

      Nope. The jury not being sequestered while the news is showing witnesses they saw testify a day earlier getting their houses sprayed with pigs’ blood – that may as well have been the prosecution’s closing argument.

      • DEG

        The latest from the Star-Tribune says the jury was sequestered:

        Jurors convicted former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin on Tuesday of all the counts filed against him — second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter — in the death of George Floyd, who died after being pinned under his knee for more than nine minutes last May.

        Jurors, who were sequestered, reached their decision after hearing closing arguments from the prosecution and defense Monday. They started deliberations afterward. Jurors heard from 44 witnesses over 14 days of testimony. The trial began seven weeks ago on March 8 with jury selection, and it was livestreamed across the world by several media outlets on multiple platforms.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        As far as I know, they weren’t sequestered when Maxine was making a fool of herself. Maybe only sequestered during deliberations?

      • Brochettaward

        They were only sequestered for the deliberations.

      • DEG

        Ah. Thanks.

      • R C Dean

        I believe they were only sequestered recently – for deliberations and maybe closing arguments? Not for the whole trial.

      • db

        My understanding was they were only “sequestered” in the sense that the judge advised/ordered them “not to watch the news.” The defense of course objected that given the modern media situation, that was useless and would not have the intended effect of preventing undue outside influence on the jurors.

        Here’s what I’m referring to:

        No, this can only be understood as a chilling message for the jurors in the Chauvin case, who were not sequestered over the weekend, and thus fully exposed to the “push” news of social media.

        Nelson: I make my comments in context of new situation. I spent weekend preparing closing remarks, I can supplement record with news reports, story lines of TV shows, I’m making it to note the record at this point, and can certainly supplement.

        Cahill: I’m aware of media reports, that Waters was talking specifically about this trial, unacceptability of anything but guilty, otherwise more violence. Abhorrent. But don’t know it has prejudiced this jury. Been told not to watch news, trust they are following those instructions. Congresswoman’s opinion really doesn’t matter a whole lot.

        (those last two paragraphs are from Legal Insurrection’s liveblogging, and not direct quotes but summaries from that live blog.)

      • LCDR_Fish

        They were only sequestered upon deliberation, (ie. 1 day) – NOT for the whole trial as would have been common sense. So they saw the Brooklyn Center shooting, Mad Maxine, and everything else.

  30. Shpip

    Florida Man hilariously decries the locust effect.

    For those of you who are fortunate enough to not be aware of Florida politicians, Grady Judd is one of the most, er… colorful ones out there. And that’s saying something.

  31. rhywun

    Mexico is promising American citizenship to Central Americans for planting trees.

    Am I taking crazy pills or does this make no sense whatsoever?

    • UnCivilServant

      It makes no sense for us. Everyone else would be winning at our expense.

  32. DEG

    Shootings sometimes happen in New Hampshire

    A man suffered life-threatening injuries Monday night in a shooting outside the South Willow Street sports gambling parlor and casino associated with DraftKings, Manchester police said.

    According to a police statement, a confrontation took place between two males outside 1279 South Willow St., police said. Multiple shots were fired, and one of the two people was hit and taken to Elliot Hospital with life-threatening injuries, the statement reads. Police found a firearm and several spent shell casing in the area.

  33. Hank

    Now I hear the news people focused on the joy and other feelings of the protesters.

  34. DEG

    NH Secretary of State doesn’t like HR 1

    New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner on Tuesday condemned a congressional proposal to adopt national ballot access requirements as an “unjustified federal intrusion”
    “I am deeply troubled and concerned about the direction some in Congress would take the states in terms of the conduct of elections,” Gardner said in testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.
    “Unjustified federal intrusion into the election process of the individual states will damage voter confidence, diminish the importance of Election Day itself and ultimately result in lower voter turnout.”
    Gardner said a no-excuse absentee balloting provision in the federal bills (H.R.1 and S.R.1) would violate New Hampshire’s constitution. Meanwhile, online voter registration and dilution of state voter ID laws would not boost voting here, he said.
    “Just because you make voting easier does not raise the turnout automatically,” Gardner said.

    • rhywun

      There’s also the small matter of HR1 being federally unconstitutional.

      • Urthona

        Is it? What’s the reasoning?. I need it for my Arsenal.

      • rhywun

        I thought it specified that the states control elections.

      • LCDR_Fish

        Nope – it federalizes the state’s business. States have their own constitutional guidelines. HR 1 tries to make blanket regs for the entire country (among other things). Massive unconstitutional overreach (as usual).

      • LCDR_Fish

        A few summaries

        https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/03/h-r-1-is-a-partisan-assault-on-american-democracy/

        It would be an understatement to describe H.R. 1 as a radical assault on American democracy, federalism, and free speech. It is actually several radical left-wing wish lists stuffed into a single 791-page sausage casing. It would override hundreds of state laws governing the orderly conduct of elections, federalize control of voting and elections to a degree without precedent in American history, end two centuries of state power to draw congressional districts, turn the Federal Elections Commission into a partisan weapon, and massively burden political speech against the government while offering government handouts to congressional campaigns and campus activists. Merely to describe the bill is to damn it, and describing it is a Herculean task in itself.

        …..

        The first target is to wipe out state laws that allow voters to be checked against a preexisting list of registrations. H.R. 1 mandates that states provide same-day registration and allow people to change their name and address on the rolls at the polling place on Election Day, then forbids states from treating their votes as provisional ballots that can be checked later. It mandates online registration without adequate safeguards against hackers. It mandates automated registration of people who apply for unemployment, Medicaid, Obamacare, and college, or who are coming out of prison. The bill’s authors expect this to register noncitizens: They create a safe harbor against prosecution of noncitizens who report that they have been erroneously registered.

        ……

        State voter-ID laws are banned, replaced simply by a sworn voter statement. The dramatic expansion of mail-in voting during the COVID pandemic is enshrined permanently in federal law. States are banned from the most elementary security methods for mail-in ballots: They must provide a ballot to everyone without asking for identification and may not require notarization or a witness to signatures. States are compelled to permit ballot harvesting so long as the harvesters are not paid per ballot. Curbside voting, ballot drop boxes, and 15 days of early voting are mandated nationwide, and the bill micromanages the location and hours of polling stations, early voting locations, and drop boxes.

        ….

        Not content to remake the American voting system, H.R. 1 takes the drawing of congressional districts out of the hands of elected state legislatures — who have done the job since the Founding — and turns them over to “independent” commissions, while banning mid-decade readjustments of district lines. It also counts inmates as residents of their last address (even if serving a life sentence), a provision aimed at reducing the representation of rural areas where prisons are located.

        These are just the warm-ups. H.R. 1’s crackdowns on political speech are at least as extensive and biased as its changes to election law, and some of the provisions on coordination and foreign-related activity are so complex that even election-law experts warn that their impact is impossible to determine. For example, one provision could be read to bar corporations from political activity if they have even a single foreign shareholder. The new anti-speech laws would generate years of litigation, and many of them would likely be struck down by the Supreme Court.

        New disclosure rules would treat huge amounts of speech and advertising on matters of public concern as if they were campaign contributions, including any advertisement urging viewers to contact elected officials to support or oppose a program, policy, or law. This would require donors to, say, the AARP to be identified as supporters of any candidate if the AARP demands that the candidate keep a promise to protect Social Security. The cumulative effect is to further burden citizen rights to petition and further insulate the government from criticism.

        501(c)(4) nonprofits would be required to disclose their donors, another potentially unconstitutional burden on the freedom to speak and associate. New limits on corporate political activity are extensive, and similar restrictions are not placed on unions. Previous rules in place to enable free speech on the Internet and prevent political bias in IRS audits are repealed.

        What would an omnibus bill be without handouts to unworthy causes, starting with the people who wrote the bill? H.R. 1 includes extensive public-funding giveaways to candidates, including a six-to-one public match for some donations to congressional and presidential campaigns. It also establishes a pilot program that gives voters $25 apiece to make government-funded donations to campaigns.

        ….

        See also https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/03/pelosis-h-r-1-is-an-authoritarian-outrage/ etc.

      • DEG

        Article I, Section IV, Clause I

        The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but Congress may at any time make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Place of chusing Senators.

        My read is that the state legislature makes the rules, but Congress can override them as long as Congress doesn’t change the Senate polling places.

      • creech

        So Congress can’t allow your kitchen table or the U.S. Mail box on the corner to be the “chusing” place if the State law requires you to show up at an official ballot station to cast your vote?

      • DEG

        That’s my reading.

        I read Lt. Cmdr Fish’s comment above. I see something about moving redistricting out of the state legislatures. I see nothing in the Constitution that requires redistricting to be handled by the state legislatures. From the little poking around I did, it looks like having districts and state legislatures draw the districts is done by statute.

      • rhywun

        I forgot about the “Congress gets to change the rules” part.

        And what a strange exception.

      • R C Dean

        It dates back to when the states appointed Senators, which makes some sense, I guess.

      • UnCivilServant

        Justices 10-45 disagree.

      • Rat on a train

        They have time to pack the court before it makes it there.

      • Suthenboy

        Since when has that impeded anyone?

  35. Ed Wuncler

    I’m thinking that this case might go to appeals but for right now, Minneapolis won’t be burned down…again.

    • Rat on a train

      It isn’t dark yet.

    • Creosote Achilles

      Ahahahahaha. They are already calling to burn the fucker down.

      • db

        not to be a dick, but I’d think we might need a citation for that.

    • Urthona

      It will be burned but… in CELEBRATION… not anger.

      Hooray!

      • Rebel Scum

        ^

    • Urthona

      I don’t think he did it.

    • Brochettaward

      And we can all be certain that those deliberations were done in the most honest and ethical manner.

    • R C Dean

      I am not a criminal lawyer (in the sense that I represent criminals, OK, in the sense that I represent people who have been accused of crimes, alright one more try, in the sense that I represent people in criminal judicial proceedings), but I’m not understanding the guilty verdict on

      second-degree unintentional murdert
      hird-degree murder and
      second-degree manslaughter

      Shouldn’t they have to pick one?

      • Urthona

        That’s what I thought to. I thought those were conflicting theories.

      • Creosote Achilles

        Your white supremacy is showing, thinking a white man should have due process.

      • Urthona

        I think he’s just surprised — as I was — that a person can be guilty of both intentional and unintentional murder at the same time.

      • Brochettaward

        The prosecutions closing arguments were a jumbled mess of lies and shit that made no sense. Explaining how they proved two contradictory things was top among the litany of bullshit.

      • db

        I read something about MN law that stated that 3rd degree murder does not require intent in MN. It’s equivalent to what in most other states is called “manslaughter.”

      • kinnath

        Shouldn’t they have to pick one?

        This is my memory of every big case. They pick one of the charges and go with it.

        I don’t understand this. Perhaps it is a peculiarity of MN law.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        Yeah, it’s possible that scrubbing away lesser includeds is a separate process.

      • Broswater

        Okay, so it’s not just me that don’t get it. I though it was just some quirks of the US Laws vs Canada.

        When I was a juror for a murder trial, it was pretty well defined to us that it was one or the other, 1st or 2nd degree murder, or involuntary manslaughter. Pick one, not all of them.

        How can you have murdered someone you just killed accidently by manslaughter or vice-versa? Both these sounds pretty much exclusionary to me.

        That to me is the literal expression behind throwing the book. ”Sure, let’s convict him for everything. Everything? Yes, everything in there.”

      • db

        See below, in response to Broswater, under comment #44.

      • db

        Sorry, in response to SW.

    • Count Potato

      “Former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin has been convicted of murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd, the explosive case that triggered worldwide protests, violence and a furious reexamination of racism and policing in the U.S. ”

      IANAL, but how is it both if there is only one victim?

      • Urthona

        Yes. When I read the charges, I assumed they had to pick one. I literally lol’ed when I read they picked all of them.

      • Rat on a train

        Nobody wanted to risk voted no on any.

    • TARDis

      I don’t understand this crap. Why are there three charges? One person died in a single event.

      weighed charges of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter

      What is the purpose of this? To sentence for the most serious charge only? Or can you be sentenced for all three?

      • Creosote Achilles

        Usually the prosecution does this so that if they don’t meet the standard of the most stringent charge the jury can still be convicted of the less stringent. That they found him guilty of all 3 charges tells you this is a political trial, not a criminal one. And the charge is actually ‘Being a white cop in proximity to a dead black man’.

      • Rebel Scum

        That they found him guilty of all 3 charges tells you this is a political trial, not a criminal one.

        Yup. There is no way to come to this verdict otherwise. I did not see/listen to every minute of the trial but I heard enough of the prosecution emoting and the defense lawyer casting doubt. And, you know, there is a ton of video of the event that can be viewed by any honest person, even and especially the police body-cams. And forget the walking, labored-breathing pharmacy that was Fentanyl Floyd at the time.

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        It’s just the various jury members’ way of saying please don’t burn my house down.

      • leon

        My understanding is that they have (succesfully) argued that the crimes are different enough that Chauvain committe all three of them in the one incident.

      • db

        See my reply below–it’s supposedly a quirk of MN law. It was really “felony murder” in the sense that he was committing a felonious assault when Floyd died.

      • leon

        Ahh. Ok. That makes a lot more sense to me.

      • Broswater

        I think I get it : Chauvin his such a hateful white supremacist that he killed Floyd 3 different ways, at the same time.

        That’s like… shooting someone in the head while he’s hanging from a lamppost from inside a woodchipper. Makes sense.

  36. Chipwooder

    Chauvin, being an asshole cop, is definitely guilty of something, but murder? That seems crazy.

    Murder is that cop shooting an unarmed Walter Scott in the back as he’s running away. Murder is those two assholes that beat Kelly Thomas to death over the course of like 20 minutes.

    • Chipwooder

      Or to put in another way – in a world where Philip Brailsford coldly shoots to death a sobbing man on his knees and gets convicted of….nothing, I’m having a hard time seeing this verdict.

    • Stinky Wizzleteats

      Good rant…

      • TARDis

        Yes indeed. But calling him a cumbucket is an insult to cumbuckets everywhere. At least cumbuckets bring some semblance of fleeting joy to those in attendance. Or at least so I’ve heard. Better that he should be just called a shitstain.

      • Grosspatzer

        Pedant point: Coprophiliacs find shitstains stimulating. Or so I’ve heard…

      • TARDis

        *sigh*

        I guess I’ll skip desert tonight.

  37. Rebel Scum

    Well that seems to be a gross miscarriage of justice. Besides, how can you even be guilty of 3 instances of killing when there was only one “victim”*?

    *That was only a victim to his poor decisions…

    • Scruffy Nerfherder

      You can be guilty of all three because the jury said “Fuck it, let’s convict and get our asses out of the meat grinder. He’ll get his appeal.”

  38. Stinky Wizzleteats

    Manslaughter: Killing by accident; Murder: Killing on purpose
    How was he convicted of both? Lawyers, restart your engines.

    • db

      MN law peculiarity.

      It’s really just felony murder.

      As a reminder, Minnesota use of the term “murder” is much broader than is typical in most states, or how the legal concept of murder is taught in law school.

      Conceptually, a homicide (the killing of one person by another) can be unlawful and intentional—what is traditionally referred to as murder—or unlawful and unintentional—what is traditionally referred to as manslaughter or criminally reckless homicide—lawful and intentional—usually self-defense or defense of others—or lawful and unintentional—accident or misadventure.

      Most other states use the term “murder” to refer to only that first category of homicide—the unlawful and intentional killing. None of the killing charges brought against Chauvin fall into the unlawful and intentional category of homicide, and so would not in most other states be referred to as murder.

      In the context of the second-degree murder charge brought against Chauvin under Minnesota statute §609.19, that statute has two subsections. The first deals with intentional homicides, and drive-by shootings—Chauvin is not charged under that section. The second section deals with unintentional homicides, either in the course of the commission of an underlying felony, or under circumstances involving a court-issued order of protection.

      Chauvin was charged with “second degree murder” under that second section, §609.19(2)(1), based upon an unintentional killing in the course of the commission of an underlying felony—what is traditionally called “felony murder.”

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        Ah, OK, that makes sense then. Hell, I can even agree with the verdict or at least not think it’s nuts.

      • Stinky Wizzleteats

        Also, I’ve heard plenty of legal analysts talking about this and they should have been shouting this distinction from the rooftops. You just cleared up what should have been made clear from the get go and was certainly known by all of them if they were worth their salt with five short paragraphs.

      • Master JaimeRoberto (royal we/us)

        So what was the underlying felony?

      • Drake

        Being white.

      • R C Dean

        My question as well. The arrest itself was lawful. Did they argue the restraints were unlawful and thus felony assault? If I was a cop, I’d be very worried about that. Both restraints were “out of the book”, although arguably both were applied too long while they waited for the ambulance. After 5 minutes, were they just supposed to let him go?

        If he hadn’t died, there’s no way Chauvin would have been charged with a felony, so tagging him with felony murder seems odd to me.

      • R C Dean

        How can you convict him of felony murder, if he isn’t convicted of the underlying felony? As far as I can tell, he wasn’t.

      • R C Dean

        Now I’ve made me go to the statute

        Subd. 2.Unintentional murders.
        Whoever does either of the following is guilty of unintentional murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:

        (1) causes the death of a human being, without intent to effect the death of any person, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other than criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive-by shooting

        It is a prerequisite that you commit or attempt to commit a felony offense. It seems like they are missing an essential element of this crime. From a due process perspective, I don’t see how you can convict someone of a crime without proving every element. I don’t see how you can prove every element of felony murder without proving the underlying felony. It just seems really strange to me that the prosecution could prove a felony in court, without ever charging the defendant with it, and without the jury giving a verdict on it.

      • db

        There is a huge discussion of this at this link.

        It comes down to (in my opinion) that the jury didn’t understand/the defense wasn’t successful in casting doubt (significant enough to overcome the jury’s fear of what would happen if they returned a not guilty verdict) on the charge that Chauvin was unlawful in his restraint.

      • db

        Note that I’m not taking a position that Chauvin was justified or not, or that his actions were or were not causative in Floyd’s death, only that if that analysis at the above link is correct, then the jury likely failed to understand the law.

        The world has enough bad opinions on what happened that day, I’m not going to add mine–my opinion is only on the law as presented above. and I ANAL.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        Yeah, this is a headscratcher. It’s all rather weird and rushed. I would’ve expected the jury to have to determine which level of unlawful killing applied, certified that they felt each and every element was satisfied, etc.

        Thats why I thought it was an acquittal based on how fast they came back. The appeals court is gonna have a fun time with this case.

      • Rat on a train

        Why stick around to actually reason when your primary concern is avoiding the mob?

      • Grumbletarian

        Both restraints were “out of the book”, although arguably both were applied too long while they waited for the ambulance. After 5 minutes, were they just supposed to let him go?

        After Floyd stopped breathing, and especially after he stopped registering a pulse, what possible reason was there to keep knelling on him? Is it a common thing for suspects to be able to stop and restart their heart at will in order to fool the police that they’re incapacitated?

      • Fatty Bolger

        Third-degree assault.

      • trshmnstr the terrible

        I always thought that you couldn’t use assault/battery in a felony murder. That’s what manslaughter is for.

  39. Ed Wuncler

    I think the tragedy of the Floyd’s case and the events surrounding it this past year has effectively killed any appetite for actual criminal justice reform and started the balkanization of this country. There’s a lot of people who thought that Chauvin was a giant asshole and at best thought he probably should have been convicted of manslaughter but at the same time wanted a fair trial that didn’t involve any politics or the threat of rioting if they didn’t get their way.

    That didn’t happen at all. It was all political since the very beginning with Biden, Waters, and other politicians sticking their noses in the trial trying to sway the outcome.

    • creech

      “at best thought he probably should have been convicted of manslaughter ”
      No, I think that’s what most folks thought he minimally should be convicted of. Given the wording (as reported) of the Minnesota law, the third degree murder conviction wasn’t improbable. Second degree may have been a stretch…at least under the laws (as reported) in other states.

      • blackjack

        Nope. 2nd in Minnesota is just plain felony murder. Commit a felony and the guy dies, guilty. 3rd is depraved indifference, much harder to prove than 2nd. Manslaughter is plain negligence. Convicting on all three equals: PLEASE DON’T BURN OUR HOUSES DOWN!!

  40. robc

    I thought murder 1, but I guess the connection to the cops wife wasnt “provable”.

    • leon

      Heh

  41. DrOtto

    Apparently you can get around double jeopardy with triple jeopardy.

  42. Grosspatzer

    Heartfelt thanks for a fallen hero

    Damn. I had no idea that Floyd set out that day on a noble quest for justice. I should pay more attention.

    In other news, happy birthday to mein little brother. You know who else… Never mind.

    • Suthenboy

      Every time that cunt opens her mouth everyone in the country loses brain cells.

    • TARDis

      Jeezus Cripsmas, shouldn’t this pandering bullshit just infuriate black folks. She is a vile piece of maggot infested goat feces.

    • Chipwooder

      I honestly didn’t see THAT take coming. Christ

      • rhywun

        It is breathtaking.

    • Rebel Scum

      He did have a heroic amount of fentanyl and meth in his system.

    • Drake

      Every hero’s journey begins by Xeroxing a few 20 dollar bills.

    • Agent Cooper

      St. George is my favorite prog prop.

  43. Hyperion

    “I know little about Ecuador, all jokes about bananas aside. Apparently its not as corrupt as we might believe.”

    Less corruption? I wonder if we can get some of that here in Murika. And maybe fair elections?

  44. Hyperion

    “Brazilian native groups don’t like being poor.”

    It’s almost like the natives there are wanting capitalism. I wonder if Biden will declare war on Brazil now? Or at least them natives.

  45. robc

    Super Keague is dead. Long live the super league.

    • Urthona

      Everyone was in it and then suddenly they weren’t.

      • Rat on a train

        So they need players? How much do they pay?

    • rhywun

      the decision to be part of the Super League was driven by our desire to protect Arsenal, the club you love argle bargle herpity derpity doo

      LOL – culture shock. They wanted to install an American-style cartel and the fans weren’t having it.

      • Urthona

        An “American-style cartel”?

        I was personally liking the idea. I can follow a single league where the only actual good teams play. Very simple.

      • rhywun

        Well, for starters, yes. From the perspective of a continent where pro-rel has been a thing for more than a century. Any team has the chance to build itself into a powerhouse.

        2ndly, the top teams in each league ARE the best – because of pro-rel. There is no guarantee that Arsenal for example is going to be “good” enough to justify being in the “Super League” forever. Hell, they could slack off and still collect a paycheck because there is no threat of being busted down a tier.

        3rdly, I enjoy a 9th tier Sunday league match just as much as the “good” teams. Sometimes more.

      • Ted S.

        Any team has the chance to build itself into a powerhouse.

        See Leipzig.

        Although I like how the DFB’s ownership rules prevented the team from calling itself Red Bull, so they had to come up with the word Rasenballsport to get RB.

      • rhywun

        That was funny. I’m not as reflexively anti-kkkorporate as the average German but even I thought naming a team after a shitty “energy drink” was ridiculous. Or, is ridiculous since they have a whole stable of teams.

      • Agent Cooper

        Works for you, but consider the working-class Spurs fan who would have to watch his team play home games in Beijing.

        Also, Arsenal has a hard enough time finishing top-4 in the Prem, in the SL, they’d be the 11th-best team every year. Would fans like that?

  46. Rebel Scum

    I wonder how hard it was for Grandpa Gropey to resist sniffing Kopmala’s hair while giving these absurd and racially divisive remarks.

  47. straffinrun

    Worrying about how this trial and result will do damage to due process is like worrying about how the latest face lift will make Pelosi look weird.

    • trshmnstr the terrible

      This. This case is interesting to me only in that we appear to have narrowly escaped having our inner cities burn down again. Otherwise, it’s a guy 1000 miles away who supposedly killed another guy 1000 miles away. That shits none my bidness.

      • blackjack

        Just wait until he gets sentenced to 12 years, that’s when the burning and looting will happen.

      • db

        Can he appeal before sentencing? The appeal will be interesting.

      • blackjack

        Probably, but it’s very rare to get a stay of execution on his sentence. Our crooked assed sheriff got one, but eventually they got around to locking him up.

        Chauvin has many issues he can appeal for. Change of venue, not sequestering the jury, among others. Yeah, we’re gonna try you right here, where the whole city burned for 6 months because of the reporting of your crime and it’s certain to burn more if you get acquitted. Oh, and the jury is free to read about the pig’s blood splashed all over your witnesses houses and the crazy rantings and criminal threats of Maxipad Waters. Sounds fair to me.

  48. westernsloper

    What’s with word press indicating you are signed in to only reject the best comment you have ever written and telling you you have to be logged in to comment which squirrel files your great comment? I can’t come up with commenting greatness like that off the cuff twice in a row. THERE’S SOME EQUITY ISSUES GOING ON AROUND HERE. (I am trying to work equity into every conversation I have this week even if the word doesn’t belong in the conversation)

    • trshmnstr the terrible

      You get logged out sometime between refreshing and hitting “post comment”.

      I may be able to code up a hacky fix in Eyepiece. It’d essentially be a button to populate the reply box with whatever was in the reply box the last time the page refreshed. I’ll add it to the to do list.

      • westernsloper

        The “Howdy, westernsloper” didn’t depart the upper right corner that I noticed. Not a big deal it just gave me something to bitch about. I am sure your to do list is big enough.

    • db

      When I write a top notch comment, I always make sure to do ctrl-a, ctrl-c.

      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .

    • DenverJ

      Meh, port 80 sucks, has always sucked, and will suck until the heat death of the universe. I blame html, myself. Primitive gobbledygook that doesn’t even have more than a handful of words it don’t! (GF has been watching British television, how’s my accent? )

  49. westernsloper

    And another thing, I think a spider bit me either from living in my lounge fleece, or maybe when I carried in fire wood. I demand equity with nature.

    • Tulip

      Find a spider, and bite it. DIY equity.

      • westernsloper

        I demand government action on this.

      • Hank

        “Waiter, there’s a fly in my soup, and I distinctly ordered spiders!”

  50. DenverJ

    I wanted to tell a story last night, but missed everybody except Hyperion. So ima repost and tell me if I include all the other stuff would it be a good submission for a post? Last night copy pasta:
    I have a story that I would like to share: the Saturday before last, I went to help a friend. His mother’s estate had sold the house he was brought home from the hospital to, and he only had until Sunday to access the property, and he had begged me all week to come help him get some things from the crawlspace above the ceiling, because he apparently didn’t know anybody else who owned a screw driver. So, being the stand up guy that I am, drove across town to help. As we are stacking things up in the driveway in preparation to loading my GFs vehicle, I noticed a police car parked on the corner, with just the front showing- like the driver was trying to watch us without being seen. I commented on this to my friend- who immediately jumped the back fence and took off, literally leaving me holding a bag. Turns out his window to enter had ended Easter Sunday, plus he had warrants out. Long story short- I was arrested for Class 1 Felony Trespassing. On Saturday night. Felony means no bond before I see a judge on Monday. I get 3 calls and use them to give instructions to GF. Sunday she comes to get the keys to her car, which is still at the property but wont be come Monday morning. Of course, the jail can only release all of my property not just the keys. Because of covid, all new arrests are in solitary. This means everybody in the block gets one hour out by themselves in the common area where the phones are. Your hour may start at 10 am, or your hour may start at 3 am. The prisoners had a pretty good system of using their time to make calls for others, but still. Ok, GF has car and has called work to say I won’t be in. Monday morning at around 1030am I go to court. The DA drops it. Yay! I’m leaving jail, right? Oh no that’s not how it works. You have to be processed. So, I am returned to a cell the size of a closet, where I wait. And wait. And wait some more. I finally leave Jefferson County Jail at 815pm on Monday night, with (remember the car keys?) no phone, no money, no wallet, and no house keys- in the snow and on the opposite side of town. They didn’t even give me bus tokens.

    • Hyperion

      So, did you ever catch up with your long lost friend yet? CWAA!

      When I was thinking about this last night, I remembered that I once could have wound up in a very similar situation.

      That was about 16-17 years ago. The guy had went through a divorce. His wife had moved out and then he got really sick and was in the hospital. I felt really bad for him and had went to see him. I had driven by his house the day before and remembered they had this super nice above ground pool and me and my ex-GF at that time had been wanting one. Nothing I’d want now, but I was poor back then.

      Anyway, so we were talking and I said ‘So, you guys settle already, you going to sell the house or are you going to keep it?’. He says ‘I don’t really know, I need money really bad.’ So I said half joking ‘Well, if you want to sell that pool…’, and he says ‘Man, if you can get it out of there, I’ll sell it to you for$$’. And I said ‘But your wife…’. So he says ‘she didn’t want anything, it’s mine, she’s moved up to MN with her parents’. so I said ‘OK’. But if she gets mad, you sort it out.

      So I told my ex-GF and she’s all excited, cause that was about as nice an above ground pool as you could get. So I said ‘Well, let’s go start getting it’. So we loaded up my tools and went out there. So we’re out there with my tools and this truck is driving by realllllyyyy realllyyy slow and I’m thinking ‘WTF?’. And they went on, so I thought, well just some local busy body.

      So a little while after I had several parts off this pool, this guy comes walking over from next door and tells me his name and then he says ‘I knew that fucker was lying’. And I just looked at him and then he says ‘The guy that said he bought this place’. I just sort of froze and we were talking and then he went back to his place and I looked at my ex-GF and said ‘Let’s get the fuck out of here’.

      To cut to the chase, my ‘friend’ had already sold the place and then tried to sell me the pool of the guy who bought it. I called him and that’s the last time we ever spoke.

      • DenverJ

        Was his name Smith? Because that sounds like the same guy.

      • DenverJ

        Also, there was zero incentive for me, monetary or otherwise. I would have much rather been at home getting a buzz and watching movies. I inconvenienced myself to get arrested.

    • grrizzly

      Holy sheet! And it’s already a dead thread. Hours old.